Categories
Judiciary

What is the Judicial College ?

Judicial College

The Judicial College serves as the central pillar of professional training and development for the judiciary across England and Wales. By providing structured, high-quality education, it ensures that judges, magistrates, tribunal members, coroners and legal advisers maintain the highest standards of competence, impartiality and fairness.

Established on the 1st April 2011, the Judicial College replaced the earlier Judicial Studies Board and unified training arrangements under a single organisation. This move strengthened consistency and efficiency while fully respecting judicial independence.

Historical Background and Governance

The College traces its roots to the Judicial Studies Board, created in 1979. The 2011 reorganisation enabled all judicial office holders under the responsibility of the Lady Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals to receive training from one body. Coroners and their officers joined in 2013.

Governance rests on statutory foundations, including the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, and the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.

The College operates within the Judicial Office. Its Board, chaired by a Court of Appeal judge which is currently the Right Honourable Lady Justice Eleanor King DBE who sets strategic direction, agrees business plans, and monitors delivery.

Supporting committees address courts, tribunals, Wales (including Welsh language needs), and international training. The Judicial College Faculty, launched in 2016, focuses on educational best practice and curriculum innovation. A defining feature remains that training is led by the judiciary, for the judiciary.

Scale and Scope of Training

The College supports approximately 24,000 judicial office holders, including around 14,600 magistrates. It organises roughly 1,700 live training courses annually, alongside extensive digital resources such as e-learning modules, webinars, bench books, and guidance materials.

Key Training Areas

  • Criminal Jurisdiction: Practical courses featuring mock trials and hearings, together with updates on sentencing, evidence, and procedural developments.
  • Civil and Family Jurisdictions: Continuing education on procedure, substantive law, and sensitive issues involving children and vulnerable parties.
  • Tribunals and Magistrates: Specialised induction and continuation programmes.
  • Coroners: Dedicated courses on inquests and investigations.
  • Senior and Cross-Jurisdictional: Seminars for High Court and appellate judges, plus flexible deployment training.

International programmes allow judicial office holders to share expertise and support capacity-building overseas.

The 2026–2030 Judicial College Strategy

Published in early 2026, the Judicial College Strategy 2026–2030 sets an ambitious path to remain a world leader in judicial education. It identifies three core priorities:

  1. High-Quality Education in the Contemporary Judicial Role – covering substantive law, judgecraft, domestic abuse awareness, trauma-informed practice, leadership, and artificial intelligence.
  2. Strong Educational Practice and Support – focusing on accessibility, inclusion, and trainer development.
  3. External Engagement and Relationships – promoting transparency and international partnerships.

Recent Initiatives and Resources

The annual Judicial College Prospectus 2026–2027 details available courses and learning outcomes. A new public summary on judicial education in domestic abuse highlights training on coercion, control, and safe participation.

Other key publications include the Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases, the Equal Treatment Bench Book and the Crown Court Compendium.

Conclusion

Well-trained judicial office holders contribute to efficient case handling, fair outcomes, and public trust. In an era of increasing case volumes, technological change, and societal expectations, the College equips its participants to respond effectively while supporting diversity, inclusion, and wellbeing.

The Judicial College represents a vital investment in the quality and integrity of justice in England and Wales. Through comprehensive, judiciary-led training and a clear strategic vision, it ensures those who deliver justice are equipped for the demands of today and tomorrow.

Check out our articles on Rule of Law, Open Justice, R v Sussex Justices, Judges Salaries and Fees, Dodgy Judges, Do you Have to Bow to a Judge ?, Can you Email a Judge ?, Can you Criticise a Judge ? and the highly dubious Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

[post_title] was last updated on the 16th July 2026

By Dom Watts

Dom Watts founded the Ministry of Injustice in July 2021. Dom is an IT Professional with 30+ years experience in Tier 1 Banking, Government, Defence, Healthcare and Global Blue Chips. Dom has no legal training and is not a lawyer but has previously consulted for a Magic Circle Law Firm. You can find Dom on X or Google.

Dom Watts publishes the Ministry of Injustice as a citizen journalist. The journalism exemption is detailed in the Data protection and journalism code of practice published by the ICO and Section 124 of the Data Protection Act 2018.

Section 2 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of truth. Section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of honest opinion. Section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of public interest. Section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the single publication rule.

Section 4a of The Limitation Act 1980 defines the time limit for actions for defamation or malicious falsehood as one year from the date on which the cause of action accrued.

Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 gives the right to freedom of expression. "This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers."

"Free speech encompasses the right to offend, and indeed to abuse another." - Para 43 Scottow v CPS [2020] EWHC 3421 (Admin)

"Free speech is a fundamental common law right" - Para 21 R v Shayler [2002] UKHL 11 [2003] 1 AC 247 per Lord Bingham and Para 42 Phillips -v- Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs [2024] EWHC 32 (Admin)

Dom is a member of The Free Speech Union

“A key issue here is the need to distinguish between conduct which, however objectionable, does not justify invoking the criminal law and conduct which crosses the line and results in criminal liability" - Para 31 R v O’Neill [2016] EWCA Crim 92 [2016]

“Harassment is generally understood to involve improper oppressive and unreasonable conduct that is targeted at an individual and calculated to produce alarm and distress” - Para 38 R v O’Neill [2016] EWCA Crim 92 [2016]

"The behaviour said to amount to harassment must reach a level of seriousness passing beyond irritations, annoyances....The gravity of the misconduct must be of an order which would sustain criminal liability" - Paras [40-44] Hayden v Dickenson [2020] EWHC 3291 (QB)

"If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything"

In 2002 Dom Watts was an unlikely consumer champion. The dad of three from Croydon took on the power and might of Kodak – and won...Dom on BBC Working Lunch

Rule of Law - Open Justice - Policing By Consent