The Law Society which is officially known as The Law Society of England and Wales, serves as the professional association representing solicitors within England and Wales. Their vision is to promote, protect and support solicitors, the rule of law and justice in England and Wales.
The Law Society has nothing to do with barristers in England and Wales. The Bar Council of England and Wales is the representative body for barristers in England and Wales.
Here are some key points about this venerable institution:
Representation and Support: The Law Society acts as the voice of solicitors, advocating for their interests and providing essential support. Whether you’re a seasoned practitioner or a trainee solicitor, this organization has your back.
Law Reform: Ever wonder who discusses and shapes legal reforms? Look no further. The Law Society serves as a sounding board for law reform initiatives. When policymakers consider changes to legal frameworks, the society provides valuable insights and recommendations.
Services: Beyond advocacy, The Law Society offers a range of services to its members. These include professional development resources, access to legal publications, and networking opportunities. Whether you’re navigating complex legal issues or seeking career guidance, they’ve got you covered.
Regulation: The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is the independent regulatory arm of The Law Society. It oversees the conduct and professional standards of solicitors. So, while The Law Society represents solicitors, the SRA ensures compliance with ethical and professional norms.
Location: The Law Society’s headquarters reside at 113 Chancery Lane, London. If you ever find yourself strolling down that historic lane, you might just glimpse the legal minds at work.
Diversity and Inclusion: The legal profession is evolving, and The Law Society actively promotes diversity and inclusion. They recognize that a diverse legal community enriches the practice of law and contributes to a fairer society.
Campaigns: The society runs campaigns on various fronts. From advocating for legal aid funding to celebrating the contributions of solicitors with South Asian heritage, they’re committed to positive change.
Legal Heroes: Imagine solicitors making a significant impact—transforming lives, communities, and society. The Legal Heroes initiative recognizes these unsung champions. They’re like legal caped crusaders, minus the spandex.
Anti-Money Laundering: In an era of financial complexity, The Law Society provides guidance to solicitors on anti-money laundering measures. Because even superheroes need to keep their finances clean.
Junior Solicitors Network: For junior solicitors navigating the early stages of their careers, this network offers support, camaraderie, and a safe space to discuss pressing issues.
The Law Society does not provide legal advice.
The Law Society publishes the official database of 201,691 legal professionals on the Find a Solicitor page on its website
We recommend you should always seek formal legal advice if required, from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).
The Bar Council of England and Wales is the representative body for barristers in England and Wales. It is said to be the voice of the barrister profession in England and Wales. The General Council of the Bar, is also commonly known as just the Bar Council.
The Bar Council of England and Wales has nothing to do with solicitors in England and Wales. The Law Society of England and Wales, serves as the professional association representing solicitors within England and Wales.
The Bar Council of England and Wales, represent and support the Bar in the public interest, championing the rule of law and access to justice. There are almost 18,000 members who are either self-employed or employed barristers. Together they “make up a united Bar that is strong, inclusive, independent and influential.”
As the General Council of the Bar, we’re the approved regulator for all practising barristers in England and Wales. We delegate our regulatory functions to the operationally independent Bar Standards Board (BSB).
Purpose: It exists to promote, protect, and represent the interests of barristers, uphold the rule of law, and ensure the highest standards of practice within the profession.
Regulation: While the Bar Council has a role in setting standards and providing guidance, the regulatory functions for barristers are handled by the Bar Standards Board (BSB). The BSB is responsible for setting the academic, vocational, and professional training requirements for barristers, as well as overseeing their conduct and discipline.
Advocacy and Policy: The Bar Council advocates on behalf of the barristers on legal policy issues, law reform, and matters affecting the administration of justice. It engages with government, parliament, and other stakeholders to influence legal policy.
Support and Services: It offers various services to its members, including professional development, training, and support in career progression. It also provides resources and guidance on professional conduct and ethics.
Structure: The Bar Council is governed by a board elected by its members, which includes representatives from different sectors of the Bar, such as the employed Bar, self-employed Bar, and various practice areas.
Public Interest: Beyond the interests of barristers, the Bar Council also works to ensure that the public has access to justice, promoting pro bono work and initiatives that enhance legal services for those who might not otherwise afford them.
History: The Bar Council was established in 1894, reflecting the profession’s long-standing tradition and evolving role in the legal landscape of England and Wales.
The Bar makes a vital contribution to the efficient and effective operation of criminal and civil courts. It provides a pool of talent, from increasingly diverse backgrounds, from which a significant proportion of the judiciary is drawn, and on whose independence the rule of law and our democratic way of life depends.
Barristers are specialist legal advisers and court room advocates which are independent, objective and trained to advise clients on the strengths and weaknesses of their case.
The Bar Council plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity and standards of the legal profession, ensuring that barristers adhere to a code of conduct that upholds the principles of justice, independence, and professionalism.
We recommend you should always seek formal legal advice if required, from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).
Money laundering is an illegal activity that involves making large sums of money, which is often generated through criminal endeavours, appear as though they come from legitimate sources.
Imagine this process as a sophisticated form of financial camouflage: the “dirty” money obtained from illicit activities (such as drug trafficking, underground sex work, terrorism, corruption, embezzlement, or gambling) undergoes a transformation to make it seem “clean.”
Here’s how it works:
Illicit Origins: Criminals initially acquire funds through illegal means. These funds are considered “dirty” because their origin is tainted—think of them as the proceeds of crime.
Layering: The money launderer then engages in a series of complex transactions to obscure its origin. This step is called “layering.” During layering, the funds are moved through various accounts, financial institutions, and jurisdictions. The goal is to create confusion and make it difficult for authorities to trace the money back to its criminal source.
Integration: Finally, the laundered money is reintroduced into the financial system in a way that makes it appear legitimate. This step is known as “integration.” It might involve investing in property, purchasing luxury goods, or funding seemingly legitimate businesses. By the end of this process, the money looks like it came from legal activities.
Why Is Money Laundering a Problem?
Criminal Enablers: Money laundering enables criminals to enjoy the fruits of their illegal activities without raising suspicion.
Destabilizing Effects: It undermines the integrity of financial systems, weakens regulatory efforts, and can destabilize economies.
Funding Terrorism: Money laundering can also finance terrorist organizations, making it a matter of national security.
Legal and Regulatory Frameworks:
Many countries have specific laws and regulations to combat money laundering. These frameworks require financial institutions, businesses, and professionals (including solicitors) to implement preventive measures.
The United Kingdom defines money laundering as “the process by which the proceeds of crime are converted into assets which appear to have a legitimate origin, so that they can be retained permanently or recycled into further criminal enterprises..” It doesn’t necessarily involve only money; any economic good can be part of the laundering process.
This article delves into Anti-Money Laundering (AML) in the UK, focusing particularly on the responsibilities of solicitors, who are often at the forefront of transactions that could be exploited for laundering activities.
Legislative Framework
The United Kingdom is recognised as a high-risk country for money laundering and has implemented stringent regulations to combat financial crimes.
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) outlines the primary money laundering offenses, with severe penalties including up to 14 years imprisonment for individuals and unlimited fines for entities.
The Criminal Finances Act 2017 introduced further measures, including the corporate offense of failure to prevent tax evasion, though its enforcement has been criticised for being less rigorous.
Solicitors’ Responsibilities
Solicitors in the UK are not just legal advisors but also gatekeepers against financial misconduct. Here’s what they are expected to do:
Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Solicitors must verify the identity of clients, beneficial owners, and anyone acting on behalf of clients. This includes understanding the purpose of business relationships or transactions.
Ongoing Monitoring: They are required to monitor transactions for unusual patterns or activities that could indicate money laundering.
Risk Assessment: Firms must assess the risk of money laundering associated with their clients and services, implementing controls based on these assessments.
Training and Awareness: Continuous training for staff on AML laws and the firm’s policies is mandatory to ensure vigilance.
Record Keeping: Detailed records of client identities, transactions, and due diligence must be maintained for at least five years.
Solicitors have an ongoing duty to be vigilant and mindful of any suspicious activity throughout a transaction in relation to Money Laundering or Tax Avoidance.
What is Tax Evasion ?
Definition: Tax evasion is the illegal practice of not paying taxes that are due. This can involve under-reporting income, inflating deductions, hiding money in secret accounts, or failing to report all taxable income.
Purpose: The aim here is to reduce the amount of tax one has to pay, often by dishonest means.
Examples:
Not declaring cash income.
Not paying tax on a property sale
Deliberately understating profits or overstating expenses.
Using offshore accounts to hide income from tax authorities.
What is the Difference between Money Laundering and Tax Evasion ?
Money laundering is about legitimising illegally obtained funds. Tax evasion, on the other hand, is about avoiding payment of taxes on income or assets, whether legally or illegally obtained.
Legal Basis:
Money laundering often involves proceeds from other crimes, making it inherently linked to criminal activity.
Tax evasion can occur with legally earned income; the crime is in the act of evading taxes.
Regulatory Focus:
Money laundering laws are often aimed at combating organised crime, terrorism financing, and other serious offenses.
Tax evasion laws are focused on ensuring individuals and entities pay their fair share of taxes.
Detection and Enforcement:
Money laundering might be detected through suspicious transaction reports or financial intelligence.
Tax evasion might be uncovered through audits, discrepancies in financial records, or whistleblower information.
Money Laundering and Tax Evasion are both serious crimes and can result in significant penalties, including fines, imprisonment, or both.
We recommend you should always seek formal legal advice if required, from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).
Misconduct in public office is a common law offence in the United Kingdom that is defined as an individual who, being a public officer, acting in that capacity or under the pretence of such office, wilfully neglects to perform his duty and/or wilfully misconducts himself to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder.
This offence carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment and is considered to be one of the most serious offences that a public official can commit.
Where there is clear evidence of one or more statutory offences, they should usually form the basis of the case, with the ‘public office’ element being put forward as an aggravating factor for sentencing purposes.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) prosecutes criminal cases that have been investigated by the police and other investigative organisations in England and Wales.
What is a Public Officer ?
The prosecution must have evidence to show that the suspect is a ‘public officer’. There is no simple definition and each case must be assessed individually, taking into account the nature of the role, the duties carried out and the level of public trust involved.
The courts have been reluctant to provide a detailed definition of a public officer. The case law contains an element of circularity, in that the cases tend to define a public officer as a person who carries out a public duty or has an office of trust.
It is extremely difficult to extract from the cases any general identifying features of public officers in a contemporary context. A person may fall within the meaning of a ‘public officer’ where one or more of the following characteristics applies to a role or function that they exercise with respect to the public at large:
The following have been accepted as holding a public office by the courts over several centuries:
Coroner (1675) Parker 2 Lev 140
Constable (1703) Wyatt 1 Salk 380
Accountant in the office of the Paymaster General (1783) Bembridge 3 Doug
K.B. 32
Justice of the Peace (1791) Sainsbury 4 T.R 451
Executive or ministerial officer (1819) R v Friar 1 Chit.Rep (KB) 702
Gaoler (1827) Cope 6 A%E 226
Mayor or burgess (1828) Henly v Mayor of Lyme 5 Bing 91
Magistrates Pinney (1832) 110 ER 349
Overseer of the poor (1891) Hall 1 QB 747
Army officer (1914) Whitaker 10 Cr.App.R.245
County Court registrar (district judge) (1968) Llewellyn-Jones 1 Q.B.429
Police officer (1979) Dytham 69 Cr.App.R.387
Local authority employees (1995) Bowden 4 All E.R 505
DVLA employees Att Gen’s Ref (No 140 of 2004) [2004] EWCA Crim 3525
Police Community Support Officer Amar Iqbal [2008] EWCA Crim 2066
Immigration officers John-Ayo [2009] 1 Cr App R (S) 71
Those in charge of police computer systems Gallagher [2010] EWCA Crim 3201
Nurses working within a prison Cosford [2014] QB 81
Church of England clergy James (1850) 2 Den 1, 169 ER 393 though its authority was doubted in the unreported case of Ball (8 September 2015) in which Wilkie J ruled that a Church of England Bishop was a public office holder.
Local councillor (2004) R v Speechley [2004] EWCA Crim 3067
Member of the Independent Monitoring Board for prisons (2010) R v Belton [2010] EWCA Crim 2857
The offence of misconduct in public office was first recognized by the English courts in the 18th century.
The earliest known case is that of Lord Ferrers in 1760, where he was charged with and found guilty of the murder of his steward, whom he had dismissed. Lord Ferrers was executed for his offence, and his case set the precedent for the use of the offence of misconduct in public office in cases involving abuse of power by public officials.
Elements of Misconduct in Public Office
The offence of misconduct in public office is comprised of three key elements. Firstly, the defendant must be a public officer. This includes anyone who holds public office, regardless of whether they are elected, appointed, or employed by the state.
Secondly, the defendant must have acted in their capacity as a public officer or under the pretence of such office. The courts have held that this element is satisfied if the defendant’s misconduct is in some way connected to their public office, even if it does not involve the direct exercise of their official duties.
Thirdly, the defendant must have wilfully neglected to perform their duty and/or wilfully misconducted themselves to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder. The courts have held that wilfulness is an essential ingredient of this offence. This means that the defendant must have intended to neglect their duty or to act in a way that amounts to an abuse of the public’s trust.
Application of Misconduct in Public Office in Case Law
Misconduct in public office has been used in a variety of contexts, including cases involving police officers, politicians, and civil servants.
One high-profile case involving misconduct in public office is that of R v Dytham. In this case, a police officer who failed to intervene when he witnessed a murder was found guilty of this offence.
Another notable case is that of R v Chaytor, where a Member of Parliament who had claimed false expenses was found guilty of this offence.
Modern Significance of Misconduct in Public Office
The offence of misconduct in public office is still relevant in the modern legal system. In 2021, two Metropolitan Police officers were charged with misconduct in public office in connection with the investigation into the disappearance of Sarah Everard. The charges related to allegations that the officers had taken photographs of Ms. Everard’s body and shared them with others.
Conclusion
Misconduct in public office is a serious offence that is used in cases involving public officials who abuse their power. The offence has a long history in the UK legal system, and it remains relevant in modern times. The elements of the offence are well established, and it has been applied in a variety of contexts, including cases involving police officers, politicians, and civil servants. While the offence carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, the courts have been careful to ensure that it is only used in cases where the defendant’s conduct is truly egregious and amounts to a serious abuse of the public’s trust.
It is worth noting that the offence of misconduct in public office is not without controversy. Some commentators have argued that the offence is too vague and open-ended, and that it can be used to prosecute individuals for conduct that is not clearly criminal. There have also been concerns that the offence is disproportionately used against public officials, and that it is not used often enough in cases involving private sector individuals who engage in similar conduct.
Despite these criticisms, the offence of misconduct in public office remains an important tool for prosecutors in cases where public officials have abused their power. As with all criminal offences, it is important that the offence is applied in a fair and consistent manner, and that individuals are not prosecuted for conduct that does not clearly amount to an abuse of the public’s trust.
If you are facing allegations of misconduct in public office, it is important to seek legal advice as soon as possible. A qualified criminal defence lawyer can help you to understand the charges against you and develop a strategy for defending yourself in court.
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) is the regulatory body for barristers in England and Wales. It was established under the Legal Services Act 2007, which brought in sweeping changes to the way legal services were regulated in England and Wales.
The Bar Standards Board regulate the Bar in England & Wales in the public interest.
In this article, we will explore the establishment of the BSB and its role in regulating the legal profession, as well as how to make a complaint.
The Legal Services Act 2007 was a major piece of legislation that reformed the way legal services were regulated in England and Wales. Prior to the Act, the regulation of legal services was split between a number of different bodies, including the Law Society and the Bar Council. The Act established a single regulatory body for all legal services, known as the Legal Services Board (LSB). The LSB was given the power to oversee all legal regulators, including the BSB, and to set standards and enforce regulations.
Establishment of the Bar Standards Board
The Bar Standards Board was established under the Legal Services Act 2007 as an independent regulatory body for barristers in England and Wales. It became operational in January 2008, taking over the regulation of barristers from the Bar Council. The BSB’s main role is to regulate the education, training, and conduct of barristers, with the aim of maintaining the highest standards of professionalism and ethical behaviour in the profession.
The BSB is governed by a board of directors, who are responsible for setting the strategic direction of the organisation and ensuring that it fulfils its statutory obligations. The board is made up of 15 members, including barristers, lay members, and a representative of the Attorney General’s Office.
Role of the Bar Standards Board
The main role of the BSB is to regulate the education, training, and conduct of barristers in England and Wales. This includes setting standards for entry to the profession, regulating the training of barristers, and enforcing professional conduct rules.
The BSB is also responsible for ensuring that barristers are competent to practise, by setting and enforcing continuing professional development (CPD) requirements. Barristers are required to undertake a certain amount of CPD each year, in order to maintain their skills and knowledge.
The BSB also has the power to take disciplinary action against barristers who breach its rules and regulations. This can range from a simple reprimand to suspension or even disbarment. The BSB’s disciplinary process is set out in the BSB Handbook, which sets out the procedures that must be followed when making a complaint or referring a matter to the BSB.
How to report a concern to the Bar Standards Board
If you have a complaint about the conduct of a barrister, you can report a concern to the BSB. The BSB has a complaints procedure in place to ensure that complaints are dealt with fairly and efficiently.
The easiest way to report something to the Bar Standards Board is to use the Online Reporting Form.
After assessing the concern and the information provided, the action the BSB can take include:-
Giving the barrister informal advice in order to reduce the risk of the problem happening again.
Informing our Supervision Team of your concerns. They could then ask that a barrister, or an organisation, do something to improve the situation or to prevent the problem happening again.
Referring the concern to our Investigation and Enforcement Team where there is potential breach of our Handbook rules for a formal investigation to be carried out to decide if enforcement action should be taken. There are a number of possible outcomes of an investigation. See how we make enforcement decisions to find out more about enforcement decisions.
Deciding not to take any action. However, we will keep the information you have given us to inform our work in the future.
The BSB Handbook is a set of rules and regulations that govern the conduct of barristers. It sets out the standards of professionalism and ethical behaviour that barristers are expected to uphold, and the procedures that must be followed when making a complaint or referring a matter to the BSB.
BSB Handbook 4.8 sets out the rules and procedures for dealing with complaints about the conduct of barristers. It covers the requirements for making a complaint, the investigations process, and the sanctions that can be imposed if a barrister is found to have breached the BSB’s rules.
One important aspect of BSB Handbook 4.8 is the requirement for barristers to co-operate fully with any investigation into their conduct. This includes providing information and documents as requested, attending interviews, and responding to correspondence in a timely manner. Failure to co-operate fully with an investigation can result in additional sanctions being imposed.
Other points of presentation can lead to points being deducted, including swigging from water bottles, putting your hands in your pockets while addressing the judge or allowing a mobile phone to ring in the middle of a legal exercise – an offence that will cost three points.
Raza Husain KC told the Court of Appeal at the start of a four-day hearing that Rwanda was an authoritarian one-party state that did not tolerate opposition and claimed it imprisons, tortures and murders opponents.
The Bar Standards Board plays a vital role in regulating the legal profession in England and Wales and is essential for maintaining public confidence in the legal system.. It is responsible for maintaining the highest standards of professionalism and ethical behaviour among barristers, and for ensuring that they are competent to practise.
If you have a complaint about the conduct of a barrister, you can make a complaint to the BSB. The BSB has a complaints procedure in place to ensure that complaints are dealt with fairly and efficiently. The BSB Handbook 4.8 sets out the rules and procedures for making a complaint, and for dealing with investigations and sanctions.
We recommend you should always seek formal legal advice if required, from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).
The latest cases in the Crown Court and Court of Appeal are available on the Sky News Courts YouTube channel. These videos are an opportunity to see justice in action.
Section 41 of the Criminal Justice Act 1925 (CJA 1925) makes it an offence to take any photograph, make or attempt to make any portrait or sketch of a justice or a witness in, or a party to, any proceedings before the court, either in the courtroom or its precincts.
The Crimes and Courts Act 2013 allows the ban to be disapplied in certain circumstances by secondary legislation. For instance, the Court of Appeal and Competition Appeal Tribunal can broadcast proceedings. The Crown court can broadcast sentencing remarks. The Supreme Court is excluded from the two bans because cases heard by the UK’s highest court, which was established in 2009, would have previously been heard in the House of Lords where broadcasting was allowed.
High Court Judge Mr Justice Goss imposed life sentences with whole-life orders
Latest Court Proceedings Videos
Please be advised that videos may contain graphic descriptions of serious crimes, including murder and sexual offences.
Thug jailed for 14 years over fatal attack on pub-goer
A thug who launched a fatal attack on a father-of-two outside a pub was jailed for 14 years.
Steven Chappell, 29, kicked and punched pub-goer Daniel Bradley, 32, while he lay ...defenceless on the floor near The Brogden pub in Porthcawl, south Wales.
Mr Bradley suffered a chest infection, a brain injury due to oxygen deprivation and a chest infection that led to sepsis. He died in hospital two weeks after the attack in September 2023.
The killer claimed he had given Mr Bradley £50 for cocaine and wanted the money back.
But Mr Bradley said it was a case of mistaken identity and he did not have the money.
Chappell was cleared of murder but convicted of manslaughter following a trial at Cardiff Crown Court. During a sentencing hearing at Newport Crown Court, he was jailed for 14 years.
Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke, the Recorder of Cardiff, said it had been a "vicious attack" which had caused "terrible grief and immeasurable pain".
She imposed an extended sentence after finding Chappell posed a danger to the public, meaning he will serve two-thirds of his sentence in custody before he can be considered for parole and will also be subject to an extended two-year licence period.
Thug jailed for 14 years over fatal attack on pub-goer
A thug who launched a fatal attack on a father-of-two outside a pub ...
A thug who launched a fatal attack on a father-of-two outside a pub was jailed for 14 years.
Steven Chappell, 29, kicked and punched pub-goer Daniel Bradley, 32, while he lay ...defenceless on the floor near The Brogden pub in Porthcawl, south Wales.
Mr Bradley suffered a chest infection, a brain injury due to oxygen deprivation and a chest infection that led to sepsis. He died in hospital two weeks after the attack in September 2023.
The killer claimed he had given Mr Bradley £50 for cocaine and wanted the money back.
But Mr Bradley said it was a case of mistaken identity and he did not have the money.
Chappell was cleared of murder but convicted of manslaughter following a trial at Cardiff Crown Court. During a sentencing hearing at Newport Crown Court, he was jailed for 14 years.
Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke, the Recorder of Cardiff, said it had been a "vicious attack" which had caused "terrible grief and immeasurable pain".
She imposed an extended sentence after finding Chappell posed a danger to the public, meaning he will serve two-thirds of his sentence in custody before he can be considered for parole and will also be subject to an extended two-year licence period.
Blackpool disorder: Ringleader jailed for 30 months
A man who led a mob through Blackpool during rioting in the town was ...
A man who led a mob through Blackpool during rioting in the town was jailed for 30 months.
Roger Haywood, 41, encouraged a group to follow him to various locations around ...the seaside resort town, including the Cenotaph and the Tower, on August 3.
Haywood repeatedly verbally abused officers while the area was busy with families, before assaulting two police officers as they arrested him.
He was part of a group which confronted police in a shopping area during the unrest and his involvement included attempting to pull the shutters up of a store and assaulting a member of security staff.
He was jailed at Preston Crown Court after previously pleading guilty to two counts of assaulting an emergency worker and violent disorder.
The Recorder of Preston, Judge Robert Altham, told him: "You repeatedly approached the police line, jabbing a finger at them and ignoring their many requests to move away.
"Next you were seen leading a large group down the promenade, some had flags and some had their faces covered.
"You were at the front with your hands above your head to beckon them on. You were clearly in the lead."
Leeds disorder: Paedophile hunter jailed over racist abuse at protest
A self-styled paedophile hunter was jailed after admitting racially ...
A self-styled paedophile hunter was jailed after admitting racially abusing pro-Palestinian demonstrators in Leeds.
Phil Hoban, 48, was a prominent figure in an anti-immigration protest in the centre of Leeds on ...3 August, where he could be seen shouting and chanting.
He was jailed for eight months, having previously pleaded guilty to causing racially aggravated harassment, alarm or distress.
Hoban founded the online Predator Exposure group and claims to have snared 440 "online predators" using his social media channels, which he described as "child protection" work.
He said he had stepped down from the group following his conviction.
Hoban was sentenced at Leeds Crown Court alongside James Gettings, 35, who was also jailed for eight months.
CCTV footage captured the pair making racist taunts, including remarks referencing Allah, and imitating the way in which Muslim worshippers pray, the court was told.
Sentencing, the Recorder of Leeds, Judge Guy Kearl KC, said the "conduct and that of your group was designed to stir up hatred".
Rotherham disorder: Two jailed over unrest at migrant hotel
Two men were jailed for a total of five years over their parts in ...
Two men were jailed for a total of five years over their parts in unrest at a hotel used to house asylum seekers.
Elliott Wragg, 23, and Stuart Bolton, 38, were ...part of a mob that congregated outside the Holiday Inn Express in the Manvers area of Rotherham on August 4.
Wragg was among a group of between 70 and 100 rioters who launched missiles at police, while Bolton screamed abuse and goaded officers who were trying to protect the hotel.
The pair were sentenced together during a hearing at Sheffield Crown Court.
Wragg, from Barnsley, admitted violent disorder and was jailed for two years and four months.
Bolton, who had travelled 50 miles from his home in North Lincolnshire to join the demonstration, also admitted violent disorder and was jailed for two years and eight months.
He further admitted driving while disqualified and with no insurance and was banned from driving for three years, while the court also ordered confiscation of his Mercedes car.
The judge, the Recorder of Sheffield, Judge Jeremy Richardson KC, told the pair: "You each participated in violent incidents which have cast a very ugly stain on this country."
Leeds disorder: Man jailed for racist taunts at protest
A man was jailed for eight months for making racist taunts at an ...
A man was jailed for eight months for making racist taunts at an anti-racism protestor during a demonstration in Leeds.
Jordan Plain, 30, made monkey noises and other racist gestures towards ...student Sarata Sawo.
Plain, who has numerous previous convictions, including for racially or religiously aggravated criminal damage, had been in attendance at an English Defence League protest.
In a victim impact statement, Ms Sawo told the court: "Many people have defended Jordan for what he did to me and said it was right. It was not right.
"I was born in Leeds and I have lived here my whole life. It's such a beautiful, diverse city.
"I don't even feel welcome in my own home. I don't even feel safe in my own house or area."
Plain pleaded guilty to using threatening or abusive words or behaviour with intent to cause alarm or distress and was sentenced at Leeds Crown Court.
The Recorder of Leeds, Judge Guy Kearl KC, told him: "Given the context in which this incident occurred and the sustained nature of your conduct, which was designed to stir up racial hatred at a time of heightened social tension, an immediate custodial sentence cannot be avoided."
IN FULL: Armchair rioter jailed over Facebook posts encouraging violence at migrant hotel
An armchair rioter was jailed for 20 months for encouraging people on ...
An armchair rioter was jailed for 20 months for encouraging people on social media to attack a hotel in Leeds housing more than 200 migrants.
Jordan Parlour, 28, made Facebook posts ...on August 4 with the intention of sparking tensions while anti-immigration demonstrations were taking place nationwide.
Parlour pleaded guilty to using threatening, abusive or insulting words in the posts before magistrates in Leeds and was sentenced at the city's Crown Court.
Parlour is believed to be the first person to face prosecution for posting allegedly criminal messages linked to the violence.
He posted a Facebook status which suggested that "every man and his dog" should target the Britannia Hotel in Seacroft.
He also claimed in a comment on Facebook that migrants were given "the Life of Riley off the tax us hard-working people earn when it could be put to better use".
At the time of Parlour's posts, the Britannia Hotel was housing 210 migrants and over the weekend staff there reported that damage had been caused to the bedroom windows.
The hotel was later locked down to protect those living there.
Sentencing Parlour, the Recorder of Leeds, Judge Guy Kearl KC, told him: "Your intention was to incite violence.
"You were encouraging others to attack a hotel which you know was occupied by refugees and asylum seekers."
Judge Kearl said the offence was aggravated by "the timing of your posts, at a time of social unrest and particular sensitivity across the country".
A custodial sentence was therefore "unavoidable", he added.
This video has been edited to remove extreme language.
The Law Society which is officially known as The Law Society of England and Wales, serves as the professional association representing solicitors… Read more: Law Society of England and Wales
Money laundering is an illegal activity that involves making large sums of money, which is often generated through criminal endeavours, appear… Read more: What is Anti Money Laundering (AML)
The BBC describes so-called “two-tier policing” as where right-wing protests are considered to be dealt with more harshly than left-wing ones by the police. This explanation is simply not true.
The most simplistic and accurate explanation of two tier policing is that there’s one rule for one person and another rule for another. The publicly shown bias and discrimination by the Police is manifesting itself irrespective of politics, sexuality, race or colour.
The police should and must operate independently under the law without fear or favour. The Rule of Law applies to everyone regardless of who they are. Policing in this country and around the world is by consent. There should no bias by the police or by anyone in the justice system.
The debate over two-tiered policing has significant implications for public trust in law enforcement. If the perception of biased policing persists, it can erode confidence in the police and exacerbate social divisions. On the other hand, dismissing legitimate concerns about unequal treatment can also harm community relations and hinder efforts to address systemic issues within law enforcement.
Two-tiered policing remains a contentious issue, with strong arguments on both sides. While some see it as a reflection of systemic biases within law enforcement, others view it as a necessary differentiation based on the nature of the protests or other lawlessness.
Regardless of where one stands on the issue, it is crucial to continue scrutinising police practices to ensure fairness and accountability in all aspects of law enforcement.
Met Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley demonstrates violent thuggery and Two Tiered Policing without Fear or Favour.
West Midlands Police discuss disorder that kicked off after misinformation spread online. The Sky News crew covering the unrest in Birmingham were followed by a man holding a knife and wearing a balaclava after broadcasting live. https://t.co/IRxFEabbZ6pic.twitter.com/uiYkVX1TS5
Policing by consent is a fundamental principle that underpins modern democratic societies. It is a concept rooted in the belief that the authority of the police derives from the consent and cooperation of the public they serve, as opposed to the power of the state.
It does not mean the consent of an individual. No individual can chose to withdraw their consent from the police, or from a law.
British policing is based on consent, meaning the ability of the police to carry out their functions rests on ‘public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour’
The nine principles of policing by consent, often referred to as the Peelian principles, were articulated by Sir Robert Peel.
There is no evidence that these principles were devised by Sir Robert Peel and it more than likely that they were devised by the first Commissioners of Police of the Metropolis (Sir Charles Rowan and Sir Richard Mayne).
What are the Peelian Principles ?
To prevent crime and disorder, as an alternative to their repression by military force and severity of legal punishment.
To recognise always that the power of the police to fulfil their functions and duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.
To recognise always that to secure and maintain the respect and approval of the public means also the securing of the willing co-operation of the public in the task of securing observance of laws.
To recognise always that the extent to which the co-operation of the public can be secured diminishes proportionately the necessity of the use of physical force and compulsion for achieving police objectives.
To seek and preserve public favour, not by pandering to public opinion; but by constantly demonstrating absolutely impartial service to law, in complete independence of policy, and without regard to the justice or injustice of the substance of individual laws, by ready offering of individual service and friendship to all members of the public without regard to their wealth or social standing, by ready exercise of courtesy and friendly good humour; and by ready offering of individual sacrifice in protecting and preserving life.
To use physical force only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient to obtain public co-operation to an extent necessary to secure observance of law or to restore order, and to use only the minimum degree of physical force which is necessary on any particular occasion for achieving a police objective.
To maintain at all times a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and that the public are the police, the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
To recognise always the need for strict adherence to police-executive functions, and to refrain from even seeming to usurp the powers of the judiciary of avenging individuals or the State, and of authoritatively judging guilt and punishing the guilty.
To recognise always that the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, and not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them.
Since 1829 these ‘General Instructions’ have been issued to every new police officer.
History of Policing by Consent
The origins of policing by consent can be traced back to the early 19th century in England. Prior to this period, law enforcement was often characterised by a lack of professionalism, corruption, and arbitrary use of power.
In 1829, Sir Robert Peel introduced the Metropolitan Police Act, which established the Metropolitan Police in London. This act marked a significant shift in policing philosophy, emphasising the idea of police as a civilian force serving the community rather than a military presence.
To implement his vision, Sir Robert Peel appointed Sir Charles Rowan and Sir Richard Mayne as the first Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police. Rowan and Mayne were instrumental in establishing a professional police force based on Peel’s principles. They implemented rigorous recruitment standards, emphasised training and discipline, and ensured that the police operated under public scrutiny and consent.
Under the leadership of Rowan and Mayne, the Metropolitan Police successfully transformed the concept of policing in London. Their commitment to upholding the principles of policing by consent set a precedent that would influence police forces worldwide.
Sir Robert Peel
Sir Robert Peel (1788-1850) was a British statesman and is widely regarded as the founder of modern policing. Born in Bury, Lancashire, England, Peel had a distinguished political career and served as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom twice, from 1834 to 1835 and from 1841 to 1846.
Peel is most renowned for his significant contributions to law enforcement and criminal justice reforms.
Peel’s reforms also included the establishment of the first detective force, the improvement of police training and professionalism, and the standardisation of police uniforms and equipment. His contributions to policing set the stage for the development of professional law enforcement agencies that focus on crime prevention, community engagement, and the protection of individual rights.
Beyond his work in law enforcement, Peel made other significant contributions to British politics. He was instrumental in the repeal of the Corn Laws, which were tariffs on imported grain that had protected British agriculture but contributed to high food prices for consumers. The repeal of these laws had a profound impact on British trade and economic development.
Sir Robert Peel’s legacy as a statesman and reformer, particularly in the field of policing, remains influential to this day. His principles continue to shape the foundations of modern law enforcement, emphasising the importance of community consent, accountability, and professionalism in the maintenance of public safety and order.
Sir Charles Rowan and Sir Richard Mayne
Sir Charles Rowan and Sir Richard Mayne were two key figures who played significant roles in the establishment and development of the Metropolitan Police in London, working closely with Sir Robert Peel. They were the first Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police, serving under Peel’s leadership and implementing his vision of professional policing.
Sir Charles Rowan (1782-1852) was a British soldier and police administrator. He was appointed as one of the two Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police when it was first established in 1829. Rowan brought his military experience and organisational skills to the role, contributing to the professionalisation and efficiency of the police force. He worked closely with Peel to implement reforms and ensure that the principles of policing by consent were upheld. Rowan’s emphasis on discipline, training, and strategic deployment of police resources helped shape the early foundations of the Metropolitan Police.
Sir Richard Mayne (1796-1868) was a British lawyer and civil servant. He also served as one of the original Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police alongside Rowan. Mayne, known for his administrative abilities, played a crucial role in developing the infrastructure and operations of the police force. He focused on establishing clear guidelines, procedures, and protocols for police officers, ensuring that they operated within the framework of the law and maintained public trust. Mayne’s contributions helped to solidify the principles of accountability, impartiality, and transparency within the Metropolitan Police.
Rowan and Mayne worked collaboratively to shape the structure and functioning of the Metropolitan Police. They were responsible for recruiting and training officers, establishing a hierarchical command structure, and implementing policies that aligned with Peel’s principles.
Their efforts were instrumental in the successful establishment of a professional and civilian police force in London, setting a standard for policing practices that influenced law enforcement agencies both in the United Kingdom and internationally.
Policing by Consent around the World
Here are some examples of how the Peelian principles of policing by consent have influenced policing globally:-
The principles of policing by consent have had a profound influence on law enforcement practices in the United States. Many police departments strive to build positive relationships with the communities they serve, engaging in community-oriented policing initiatives, implementing transparency measures, and emphasising de-escalation techniques. The principles have also informed the development of professional standards and training programs for officers.
Australian police forces have embraced the Peelian principles as a foundation for their operations. Community engagement, collaboration, and accountability are emphasised in Australian policing, with efforts made to build trust and partnerships with the diverse communities across the country. The principles have guided the development of community policing programs and the adoption of ethical standards.
Policing in Canada is influenced by the Peelian principles, particularly in terms of community engagement and accountability. Canadian police agencies have adopted community policing strategies, emphasising the importance of building relationships, problem-solving, and preventative measures. The principles also guide the training and professional conduct of Canadian police officers.
The Peelian principles have shaped the philosophy of policing in New Zealand. The New Zealand Police explicitly incorporate the principles into their values and code of conduct. The focus on community engagement, proactive policing, and respect for human rights aligns with the Peelian principles. New Zealand Police have also emphasised the importance of building trust and legitimacy through transparency and accountability.
Policing in various European countries has been influenced by the Peelian principles. Concepts such as community policing, the protection of individual rights, and the need for police legitimacy are prevalent across European police forces. Efforts are made to establish partnerships with communities, promote equality and impartiality, and maintain transparency in police operations.
It’s important to note that while the Peelian principles have had a broad impact on policing worldwide, the specific application and implementation may vary across different countries, taking into account local laws and cultures.
Nonetheless, the principles continue to shape the ongoing development of modern policing, emphasising the importance of maintaining public trust and collaboration with the communities they serve.
We recommend you should always seek formal legal advice if required, from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).
Christophobia, or Christianophobia, refers to an irrational fear, hatred, discrimination, or prejudice against Christians, Christianity, or its practices. Here’s a deeper look based on various perspectives and historical contexts:
Definition and Usage: The term combines “Christo-” (referring to Christ or Christianity) with “-phobia” (from the Greek word for fear). While the suffix might suggest an irrational fear, in broader usage, it encompasses hatred, bias, and discrimination as well. This term has been used in discussions around the world, including in academic, religious, and political contexts, to describe various forms of anti-Christian sentiment.
Historical Context:
Ancient Persecution: Early Christians faced persecution in the Roman Empire, where refusal to worship Roman gods led to their marginalization and often violent suppression.
Modern Instances: Throughout history, from the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror to the Soviet Union’s state atheism, there have been notable periods where Christianity was actively suppressed or persecuted.
Contemporary Manifestations:
Western World: Here, Christophobia might manifest more subtly through cultural disdain, legal challenges to religious freedoms, or media portrayals that marginalize Christian beliefs. There’s an observed trend where Christian values or symbols are removed from public spaces or discourse, often under the guise of secularism or neutrality.
Other Regions: In some parts of the world, especially where other religious or ideological groups hold power, Christians might face overt persecution, including violence, forced conversions, or severe legal restrictions.
Public Discourse and Recognition:
International Bodies: Terms like “Christianophobia” have been recognized in some UN documents alongside other forms of religious discrimination like Islamophobia and anti-Semitism, indicating a global acknowledgment of the phenomenon.
Debate Over Terminology: There’s debate over using “-phobia” due to its implication of irrational fear rather than just hatred or discrimination. Critics argue this might oversimplify complex socio-political dynamics or be used to stifle criticism of Christianity.
Cultural and Social Implications:
In Media and Academia: There’s an observed trend where Christianity might be portrayed negatively or critically in media or academic settings, sometimes leading to a broader cultural disdain or dismissal of Christian beliefs.
Legal and Political: This can translate into policies or legal decisions that limit Christian expression or practice, often framed within discussions of secularism, human rights, or equality.
Christian Perspective: From a Christian viewpoint, as reflected in some theological discussions, Christophobia might be seen as part of a broader spiritual battle, where opposition to Christian values or practices is expected due to the inherent conflict between worldly values and Christian teachings.
Public Sentiment on X: On platforms like X, discussions around Christophobia often highlight personal experiences of discrimination, cultural shifts against Christian norms, or compare the treatment of Christianity with other religions in terms of public discourse and legal protections.
In summary, Christophobia describes a spectrum of negative attitudes and actions against Christians and Christianity, ranging from subtle cultural biases to overt persecution. The term, while debated for its accuracy or appropriateness, captures a recognised phenomenon of anti-Christian sentiment globally.
A Christian is an adherent of Christianity, which is a monotheistic religion based on the life, teachings, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, as described in the New Testament of the Bible. Here’s a more detailed breakdown:
Core Beliefs:
Jesus Christ: Christians believe that Jesus is the Messiah (or Christ) prophesied in the Old Testament, the Son of God, and part of the Holy Trinity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit). Jesus is central to Christian faith, seen as both fully divine and fully human.
Salvation: Many Christians believe in salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. This often involves the concept that Jesus died to atone for humanity’s sins, offering forgiveness and eternal life to those who believe in him.
The Bible: Christians generally accept the Bible as the authoritative word of God, comprising the Old Testament (shared with Judaism) and the New Testament, which includes the Gospels (accounts of Jesus’s life), Acts of the Apostles, epistles (letters from early Christian leaders), and the Book of Revelation.
Resurrection: The belief in Jesus’s resurrection from the dead is fundamental, symbolising victory over sin and death.
Practices:
Worship: This can include attending church services, prayer, reading the Bible, and participating in sacraments or ordinances like baptism and the Eucharist (or Communion).
Community: Christianity often emphasizes community life, fellowship, and acts of charity and service, reflecting Jesus’s teachings on love, forgiveness, and helping others.
Moral and Ethical Living: Christians are encouraged to live according to the moral and ethical teachings of Jesus, which include loving one’s neighbor as oneself, forgiveness, humility, and honesty.
Diversity in Christianity:
Denominations: Christianity has numerous denominations (e.g., Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox), each with variations in doctrine, practice, and governance. These differences can affect how the faith is practiced and interpreted.
Cultural Expressions: Christianity has adapted to various cultures worldwide, leading to a rich diversity in worship styles, theological emphases, and social practices.
Historical Context:
Origins: Christianity began in the 1st century in Judea, spreading rapidly throughout the Roman Empire and beyond, influenced by the missionary work of the Apostles and early followers.
Development: Over centuries, Christianity has evolved, split, and reformed, influenced by theological debates, cultural integration, and historical events like the Reformation in the 16th century.
Modern Christianity:
Global Presence: Christianity is one of the world’s largest religions, with followers on every continent. It plays significant roles in global politics, culture, and social issues.
Contemporary Issues: Modern Christians engage with various issues like human rights, environmental stewardship, social justice, and the relationship between church and state, often reflecting diverse interpretations of Christian teachings.
Identity:
Personal Faith: Being a Christian can be as much about personal faith, a relationship with God through Jesus, as it is about communal practice or doctrinal adherence.
Lifestyle: For many, Christian identity influences lifestyle choices, moral decisions, and worldview, aiming to emulate the life and teachings of Jesus.
In essence, a Christian is someone who follows Jesus Christ, embracing his teachings and often seeking to live by his example, though the specifics of belief and practice can vary widely across the global Christian community.
What is a Phobia ?
A phobia is an extreme or irrational fear of an object, place, situation, feeling, or animal. Here’s a more detailed look:
Definition:
Medical Definition: In clinical psychology, a phobia is classified as an anxiety disorder where the fear experienced is significantly disproportionate to the actual danger posed by the object or situation. This fear often leads to avoidance behaviors, which can interfere with daily life.
Characteristics:
Excessive Fear: The fear is out of proportion to the actual threat. For example, while it’s normal to feel cautious around heights, someone with acrophobia might experience debilitating fear even on a low ladder.
Avoidance: People with phobias often go to great lengths to avoid the source of their fear. This avoidance can limit their activities and restrict their lives.
Anxiety Response: Encountering or even thinking about the phobic stimulus can trigger an immediate anxiety response, which might include symptoms like sweating, rapid heartbeat, trembling, shortness of breath, or a full-blown panic attack.
Recognition of Irrationality: Typically, individuals with phobias acknowledge that their fear is excessive or unreasonable, yet they feel powerless to control it.
Types of Phobias:
Specific Phobias: These are fears centered around a particular object or situation, like arachnophobia (fear of spiders) or claustrophobia (fear of confined spaces).
Social Phobia (Social Anxiety Disorder): This involves an intense fear of social situations, particularly of being judged or scrutinized by others, leading to avoidance of social interactions.
Agoraphobia: Often misunderstood as a fear of open spaces, it’s more about fear of environments where escape or help might not be immediately available, like public transportation, open spaces, or being outside the home alone.
Treatment:
Exposure Therapy: Gradually and repeatedly exposing the person to their fear in a controlled way helps reduce the fear response over time.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): This helps individuals change the way they think (cognitive patterns) and act (behavior) towards the feared object or situation.
Medication: While not a cure, medications like beta-blockers or antidepressants can help manage symptoms, particularly in conjunction with therapy.
Virtual Reality Therapy: Increasingly used for exposure therapy, especially for phobias like fear of flying or heights.
Cultural Context:
Phobias can also be culturally influenced. What might be considered a phobia in one culture might be a normal fear or even a revered trait in another. For example, in some cultures, a fear of spirits or the supernatural might be more widespread and accepted.
Understanding phobias involves recognising them not just as irrational fears but as complex psychological conditions that can significantly impact an individual’s quality of life. Treatment often focuses on helping individuals manage and eventually overcome these fears, allowing them to live more freely.
“Using threatening, abusive or insulting language to rile up racism online is unacceptable and is breaking the law……It is not an offence to have strong or differing political views, but it is an offence to incite racial hatred”
Islamophobia refers to an irrational fear, hostility, or prejudice against Islam, Muslims or those perceived to be Muslim. Here’s a breakdown based on various perspectives and definitions:
General Definition: At its core, Islamophobia is described as an aversion, hostility, or fear of Islam or Muslims. This can manifest in various forms, including discrimination, negative stereotyping, and bias-motivated violence or harassment.
Historical Context: The term has roots tracing back to the early 20th century, but it gained significant traction in the late 1990s. Historically, tensions between Islamic empires and European Christian entities during the Middle Ages laid some groundwork for what evolved into modern Islamophobia. This was exacerbated by colonial narratives, the post-9/11 “War on Terror,” and media portrayals linking Islam with terrorism.
As Racism: Some scholars and activists argue that Islamophobia should be considered a form of racism, especially since it often targets cultural and ethnic markers associated with Muslim identity, not just religious beliefs. This perspective sees Islamophobia as a form of cultural racism, where discrimination is based on perceived cultural or religious differences.
Criticism and Controversy: There’s debate around the term itself. Critics argue that labelling criticism of Islamic practices or doctrines as “Islamophobia” can sometimes be used to stifle legitimate critique or discussion. Some view the term as a tool to engineer guilt or silence dissent, suggesting that not all fear or criticism of Islam is irrational or phobic, but might be based on specific actions or interpretations of Islamic teachings.
Impact: Islamophobia has real-world impacts, leading to policies of surveillance, discrimination in employment, housing, and education, hate crimes, and social exclusion. It’s not just about individual prejudice but also about systemic discrimination and institutional practices that marginalize Muslims.
Public Sentiment: From posts on X, there’s a spectrum of views. Some see Islamophobia as a justified response to perceived threats, while others view it as a form of racism or a tool for political manipulation. There’s also a narrative where understanding Islamophobia is equated with understanding its historical and political context, including how it’s been weaponized in discourse.
UN Perspective: The United Nations has recognized Islamophobia, designating March 15 as the International Day to Combat Islamophobia, aiming to promote tolerance and peace based on respect for human rights and religious diversity.
‘What about Hindu, Sikh phobia?’: India calls out U.N resolution on Islamophobia
A phobia is an extreme or irrational fear of an object, place, situation, feeling, or animal. Here’s a more detailed look:
Definition:
Medical Definition: In clinical psychology, a phobia is classified as an anxiety disorder where the fear experienced is significantly disproportionate to the actual danger posed by the object or situation. This fear often leads to avoidance behaviors, which can interfere with daily life.
Characteristics:
Excessive Fear: The fear is out of proportion to the actual threat. For example, while it’s normal to feel cautious around heights, someone with acrophobia might experience debilitating fear even on a low ladder.
Avoidance: People with phobias often go to great lengths to avoid the source of their fear. This avoidance can limit their activities and restrict their lives.
Anxiety Response: Encountering or even thinking about the phobic stimulus can trigger an immediate anxiety response, which might include symptoms like sweating, rapid heartbeat, trembling, shortness of breath, or a full-blown panic attack.
Recognition of Irrationality: Typically, individuals with phobias acknowledge that their fear is excessive or unreasonable, yet they feel powerless to control it.
Types of Phobias:
Specific Phobias: These are fears centered around a particular object or situation, like arachnophobia (fear of spiders) or claustrophobia (fear of confined spaces).
Social Phobia (Social Anxiety Disorder): This involves an intense fear of social situations, particularly of being judged or scrutinized by others, leading to avoidance of social interactions.
Agoraphobia: Often misunderstood as a fear of open spaces, it’s more about fear of environments where escape or help might not be immediately available, like public transportation, open spaces, or being outside the home alone.
Treatment:
Exposure Therapy: Gradually and repeatedly exposing the person to their fear in a controlled way helps reduce the fear response over time.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): This helps individuals change the way they think (cognitive patterns) and act (behavior) towards the feared object or situation.
Medication: While not a cure, medications like beta-blockers or antidepressants can help manage symptoms, particularly in conjunction with therapy.
Virtual Reality Therapy: Increasingly used for exposure therapy, especially for phobias like fear of flying or heights.
Cultural Context:
Phobias can also be culturally influenced. What might be considered a phobia in one culture might be a normal fear or even a revered trait in another. For example, in some cultures, a fear of spirits or the supernatural might be more widespread and accepted.
Understanding phobias involves recognising them not just as irrational fears but as complex psychological conditions that can significantly impact an individual’s quality of life. Treatment often focuses on helping individuals manage and eventually overcome these fears, allowing them to live more freely.
Official UK Government Definition of Islamophobia September 2024
Unbelievable
The Labour Party keep saying they are going to root out Islamophobia.
Today I asked the Secretary of State for their official definition of Islamophobia.
Deputy Prime Minister The Rt Hon Angela Rayner MP asked for the Government Definition of Islamophobia on the 2nd September 2024
What is the difference between Islam and a Muslim
The distinction between Islam and a Muslim is fundamental to understanding both the religion and its followers:
Definition: Islam is a monotheistic religion that originated in the 7th century in what is now Saudi Arabia. The word “Islam” itself means “submission” or “surrender” in Arabic, referring to submission to the will of God (Allah).
Core Beliefs:
Tawhid: The oneness of God. Muslims believe in one God, Allah, who is indivisible and incomparable.
Prophethood: Muslims believe that Muhammad is the last in a line of prophets that includes Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus, among others.
Revelation: The Quran is considered the verbatim word of God, revealed to Muhammad through the angel Gabriel.
Angels: Belief in angels as messengers of God.
Day of Judgment: Belief in the afterlife, where deeds in this life will be judged.
Divine Decree: Everything good or bad is believed to be according to the will of God.
Practices: Known as the Five Pillars of Islam:
Shahada: Declaration of faith.
Salah: Prayer five times a day.
Zakat: Almsgiving, or giving to charity.
Sawm: Fasting during Ramadan.
Hajj: Pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in a lifetime if financially and physically able.
Definition: A Muslim is an adherent of Islam. The term “Muslim” means “one who submits to God.”
Identity: Being a Muslim involves both belief in the tenets of Islam and the practice of its rituals. However, the practice can vary widely due to cultural differences, personal interpretations, and levels of observance.
Diversity: Muslims are incredibly diverse, spanning different ethnicities, cultures, languages, and interpretations of Islamic teachings. This diversity means that what it means to be a Muslim can differ significantly from one individual or community to another.
Community: Muslims form a global community known as the Ummah, which transcends national boundaries, emphasizing a shared identity through faith.
Key Differences:
Concept vs. Practitioner: Islam is the religion, the set of beliefs, practices, and laws. A Muslim is someone who follows this religion. This is akin to Christianity and a Christian, or Judaism and a Jew.
Static vs. Dynamic: Islam, as a religion, can be seen as static in its foundational texts (Quran and Hadith), though interpretations evolve. Muslims, however, are dynamic, living entities whose practices, interpretations, and experiences of Islam can vary widely.
Universal vs. Individual: Islam provides a universal framework for belief and practice. However, how Muslims engage with this framework can be deeply personal or communal, influenced by culture, education, personal experiences, and regional practices.
Adherence: Not all who are culturally or ethnically identified as Muslim might practice Islam in the same way or at all. Conversely, someone who converts to Islam becomes a Muslim, regardless of their previous cultural or ethnic background.
Understanding this distinction helps in appreciating the complexity of religious identity and practice, where Islam provides the theological and practical framework, while Muslims are the diverse followers who interpret and live out this framework in myriad ways.
Can you be racist against a religion ?
The concept of being “racist against a religion” often arises from a misunderstanding or conflation of terms, but it touches on several nuanced points:
Cultural Racism: While religion itself isn’t a race, religious practices are often deeply intertwined with cultural identity. For instance, Islamophobia might not target race directly but can manifest in racialised forms where people of certain ethnic backgrounds associated with Islam (like Middle Eastern or South Asian) face discrimination, even if they’re not Muslim. This is where cultural racism comes into play, where cultural markers (including religious ones) are used as proxies for racial discrimination.
Stereotyping and Prejudice: Prejudice against followers of a religion can sometimes be expressed in ways that resemble racial prejudice. For example, assuming all Muslims are terrorists or all Jews are greedy are stereotypes that, while not inherently racial, function similarly by generalizing characteristics to a group based on their religious identity.
Intersectionality: Religion often intersects with ethnicity or nationality. Discriminating against someone for being, say, a “Muslim” in a Western context, might actually be discrimination against their perceived ethnicity or cultural background, which is where the line between religious and racial discrimination blurs.
Islamophobia as a Case Study: Islamophobia is often cited in discussions about racism against religion. While Islam is a religion, not a race, the term “Islamophobia” has been used to describe a range of negative attitudes and actions towards Muslims, which can include racial elements due to the association of Islam with certain racial or ethnic groups. Critics argue that labeling criticism of religious practices or doctrines as “racism” can sometimes be a misnomer, but it highlights how religious discrimination can take on racial overtones.
Legal and Social Perspectives: From a legal standpoint, like in the U.S., discrimination based on religion is distinct from racial discrimination but can be equally unlawful under civil rights laws. However, societal perceptions might not always make this distinction clear, leading to behaviors that might be labeled as racist even if they’re primarily motivated by religious bias.
Public Discourse and Media: Media portrayal and public discourse often fail to differentiate between cultural, religious, and racial identities, leading to a conflation where criticism or discrimination against religious practices might be perceived or presented as racial prejudice.
Theological vs. Racial Criticism: There’s a valid distinction between criticizing religious doctrines or practices (theological critique) and making derogatory generalizations about people based on their religion in a way that mirrors racial slurs or stereotypes (which could be seen as akin to racism due to its broad, unfair generalization).
In essence, while religion and race are different, the discrimination or prejudice against someone based on their religion can sometimes mimic racism in its effects, especially when religious identity is closely tied to cultural or ethnic identity. This doesn’t make religion a race, but it shows how discrimination can operate across these lines, leading to debates about what constitutes “racism” when religious groups are targeted. The term “racism” might be misapplied in these contexts, but it underscores the complexity of identity where religion, culture, and ethnicity intersect.
“Using threatening, abusive or insulting language to rile up racism online is unacceptable and is breaking the law……It is not an offence to have strong or differing political views, but it is an offence to incite racial hatred”
The Law Society which is officially known as The Law Society of England and Wales, serves as… Read more: Law Society of England and Wales
Jo Shiner was formally announced as Chief Constable of Sussex Police on the the 30th… Read more: Chief Constable Jo Shiner Sussex Police Retire, Rejoin and a Samosa
The Bar Council of England and Wales is the representative body for barristers in England… Read more: Bar Council of England and Wales
Money laundering is an illegal activity that involves making large sums of money, which is often… Read more: What is Anti Money Laundering (AML)
