Categories
Law

Open Justice

open justice

What is Open Justice ?

Open justice is a fundamental principle of the United Kingdom’s legal system.

It means that Justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done. This principle ensures that the public can have confidence in the fairness and transparency of the legal system.

It requires that court proceedings are held in public, and that the media and the public are allowed to attend trials and access court documents. This transparency is vital to ensuring that the justice system is accountable, and that the public can trust that it is being conducted fairly.

The principle of open justice is enshrined in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right to a fair trial.

The UK government has also enacted legislation, such as the Contempt of Court Act 1981, to ensure that the principle of open justice is upheld.

Open justice serves several important purposes

Firstly, it ensures that justice is seen to be done. This is important because the public must have confidence in the justice system. If court proceedings were held behind closed doors, it would be difficult for the public to know whether justice was being served. The transparency of open justice allows the public to see that the court is conducting proceedings fairly, and that justice is being done.

Secondly, open justice promotes accountability. The media and the public can attend court proceedings, and they can report on what happens in court. This means that the legal system is subject to public scrutiny, and that any problems or injustices are likely to be exposed. This is important because it helps to prevent abuses of power, and ensures that the justice system is accountable to the public.

Open justice helps to promote the rule of law. When the legal system is transparent and accountable, people are more likely to obey the law. This is because they have confidence that the legal system is fair, and that justice will be served if they are accused of a crime. This also helps to ensure that society is orderly and peaceful.

Notable Cases

There have been several notable cases in which the principle of open justice has been violated. One such case is that of the Birmingham Six. In 1974, six men were wrongly convicted of carrying out bombings in Birmingham, England. They were only released in 1991, after it was revealed that the police had fabricated evidence against them.

The case was a major miscarriage of justice, and it highlighted the importance of open justice.

Another notable case where justice was not open was the trial of the Guildford Four, who were wrongly convicted of bombings in Guildford, Surrey, in 1974. The trial of the Guildford Four was held in camera, and the defendants were not allowed to have legal representation.

The trial was held in secret because the judge was concerned that the defendants might be targeted by terrorists if their identities were made public.

However, the decision to hold the trial in secret was widely criticised, and the Guildford Four were eventually cleared of all charges in 1989.

The importance of open justice was also highlighted in the Hillsborough disaster, where 96 football fans were killed in a crush at the Hillsborough stadium in Sheffield in 1989.

The initial inquest into the disaster was heavily criticised for its lack of transparency and accountability. The families of the victims were denied access to evidence and were not allowed to question witnesses.

The inquest was widely seen as a cover-up, and it was eventually quashed in 2016, paving the way for a new inquest that was held in a much more open and transparent manner.

Secret trials

In recent years, there have been concerns that the principle of open justice is being undermined. One issue is the increasing use of secret trials. These trials are held behind closed doors, and the evidence is not made public.

Secret trials are used in cases where national security is at stake, but critics argue that they are being used too frequently, and that they undermine the principle of open justice.

Reporting Restrictions

Another issue is the use of reporting restrictions, which prevent the media from reporting on certain aspects of a trial. Critics argue that these restrictions can be used to protect the powerful, and that they limit the public’s right to know.

Open Justice Conclusion

In conclusion, open justice is a fundamental principle of the UK’s legal system. It ensures that justice is seen to be done, promotes accountability, and helps to promote the rule of law.

It is important to ensure that the principle of open justice is upheld, and that the legal system remains transparent and accountable. This requires a commitment from the government, the judiciary, and the legal profession to ensure that court proceedings are held in public, that the media and the public are allowed to attend trials, and that court documents are accessible. It also requires a commitment to addressing any violations of the principle of open justice, such as the use of secret trials and reporting restrictions.

In recent years, there have been concerns that the principle of open justice is being undermined, and that the legal system is becoming less transparent and accountable. It is important to address these concerns, and to ensure that the principle of open justice remains a cornerstone of the UK’s legal system. This will help to ensure that justice is served fairly and transparently, and that the public has confidence in the legal system.

Open Justice around the world

Open justice is not just a UK principle, but a principle that is upheld in many countries around the world. It is a fundamental aspect of a democratic society, and one that is essential to upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights of citizens.

Check out our related articles on Rule of Law, Innocent until Proven Guilty, Open Justice, R v Sussex Justices, HHJ Farquhar, HHJ Bedford and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

We recommend you should always seek formal legal advice if required, from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

We have a number of links to Free Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on our Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Read the reviews of Junior Sussex Barrister Gavin Howe and Legal 500 Junior Barrister Eleanor Battie

“He is awful, underhanded and should not be practising law!”

“She is a one-woman legal A Team”

Latest Articles

All articles can be found in the Sitemap or Legal Blog pages.

Open Justice was last updated on the 6th October 2024

By Dom Watts

Dom Watts founded the Ministry of Injustice in July 2021. Dom is an IT Professional with 30+ years experience in Tier 1 Banking, Government, Defence, Healthcare and Global Blue Chips. Dom has no legal training and is not a lawyer but has previously consulted for a Magic Circle Law Firm. You can find Dom on X or Google.

Dom Watts publishes the Ministry of Injustice as a citizen journalist. The journalism exemption is detailed in the Data protection and journalism code of practice published by the ICO and Section 124 of the Data Protection Act 2018.

Section 2 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of truth. Section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of honest opinion. Section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the single publication rule.

Section 4a of The Limitation Act 1980 defines the time limit for actions for defamation or malicious falsehood as one year from the date on which the cause of action accrued.

Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 gives the right to freedom of expression.

In 2002 Dom Watts was an unlikely consumer champion. The dad of three from Croydon took on the power and might of Kodak – and won………

Dom on BBC Working Lunch

Equal Justice Under Law
Access To Justice Is A Right Not A Privilege
Rule of Law - Open Justice - Policing By Consent