Lying refers to the act of deliberately telling or conveying something that is not true, with the intent to deceive or mislead someone. People, companies and institutions may lie for various reasons, such as shame, panic, or the desire to cover for someone else.
Here are some key aspects of lying :-
- Intent: The person knows the truth but chooses to say something false.
- Purpose: It often aims to manipulate the perception or actions of others.
- Examples: Saying you didn’t do something you actually did, or claiming knowledge of something you don’t know.
Dishonesty, while encompassing lying, is broader and can include various forms of untruthfulness or withholding the truth.
Here’s what dishonesty entails :-
- Scope: It includes not only lying but also actions like:
- Misleading: Providing information in a way that leads to a false conclusion without directly lying.
- Omission: Leaving out important information that would change the understanding of the situation.
- Exaggeration: Stretching the truth to an extent that it misrepresents reality.
- Deception: Using any method (including lies, but not limited to) to make someone believe something that isn’t true.
- Intent: While lying always involves intent to deceive, dishonesty can sometimes be less deliberate, such as when someone might inadvertently mislead by not clarifying a misunderstanding.
- Examples:
- Not correcting someone’s false assumption (omission).
- Overstating one’s qualifications in a resume (exaggeration).
- Crafting a story in a way that manipulates the truth without directly lying (misleading).
Key Differences:
- Directness: Lying is direct falsification of truth, while dishonesty can be indirect or through omission.
- Intent: Lying always requires intent to deceive; dishonesty might not always involve deliberate deceit.
- Behaviour: Lying is a specific behaviour within the broader spectrum of dishonesty.
A Lucas Direction, stemming from the case of R v Lucas (Ruth) [1981] EWCA Crim J0519-8, is a legal principle used in criminal trials to guide the jury on how to consider the evidence of lies told by a defendant. The case of Regina v Lucas (Ruth) is a landmark decision that established the criteria under which a lie can be considered as evidence of guilt.
In essence, all lies are dishonest, but not all dishonesty involves lying. Dishonesty can be more passive or indirectly manipulative, whereas lying is an active, deliberate fabrication of the truth.






The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.
Most Popular ↓




What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?
Latest Articles ↓
- His Honour Andrew Menary KCHis Honour Judge Andrew Gwyn Menary is a Circuit Judge and the Recorder of Liverpool. He is the most senior judge at Liverpool Crown Court.… Read more: His Honour Andrew Menary KC
- Firearms AmnestyIn an unprecedented move to tackle the rising threat of converted firearms within the UK, a national amnesty has been initiated for specific types of… Read more: Firearms Amnesty
- Mr Justice GooseMr Justice Goose is a British High Court judge in the King’s Bench Division. Sir Julian Nicholas Goose is known as The Honourable Mr Justice Goose and should… Read more: Mr Justice Goose
- Open JusticeThe Open Justice Principle refers to the idea that justice should be administered openly, transparently and in a manner that is accessible to the public.… Read more: Open Justice
All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.
You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).
‘Justice delayed is justice denied’
William Ewart Gladstone
There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.
Lying vs Dishonesty ? was last updated on the 17th February 2025