Categories
Legal Analysis

What is a Judgment ?

Judgment

A judgment, also known as a judicial decision or court ruling, is the final decision made by a court of law in a legal case or dispute. It represents the court’s official decision on the matters brought before it and typically resolves the legal issues in question.

It is the culmination of legal proceedings, where a judge evaluates evidence, arguments and applicable laws to arrive at a verdict. Whether it’s a criminal case, family dispute, civil dispute or administrative matter, a judgment carries significant consequences for the parties involved.

A judgment may include various elements such as:

  1. Findings of Fact: The court’s determination of what events or circumstances occurred in the case.
  2. Conclusions of Law: The legal principles applied by the court to the facts of the case to reach a decision.
  3. Decision or Disposition: The specific outcome or ruling of the case, which could include a verdict of guilty or not guilty (in a criminal case), or a judgment for the plaintiff or defendant (in a civil case).
  4. Orders: Any specific actions or remedies ordered by the court as part of the judgment, such as monetary damages, injunctions, or other relief.

A court judgment is typically written and issued by a judge or a panel of judges. It is a formal and legally binding document that concludes the legal proceedings in the case, although it may be subject to appeal or modification under certain circumstances.

Sometimes, judgment is reserved, which means withholding a final opinion until more information is available. It acknowledges the complexity of issues and avoids premature conclusions.

These are the latest judgments published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary of England and Wales.

  • R -v- Gordon Huntley Baptiste Mills-Smith Quailey-Dashper Ginova
    At Cardiff Crown Court 24th June 2026 The Kingv(1) Joshua Gordon (2) Renaldo Baptiste (3) Marcus Huntley(4) Jordan Mills-Smith(5) Melissa Quailey-Dashper(6) Kristina Ginova Sentencing Remarks of Mr Justice Fordham The post R -v- Gordon Huntley Baptiste Mills-Smith Quailey-Dashper Ginova appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary.
  • Barclays and others -v- Financial Ombudsman Service Limited
    Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1555 (Admin) Case numbers: AC-2024-LON-003318 AC-2024-LON-003499AC-2024-LON-003464AC2024-LON-003282 Date: 24 June 2026 In the High Court of JusticeKing’s Bench DivisionAdministrative Court Before: Mr Justice Dexter Dias Between : (1) Barclays Bank UK PLC(2) National Westminster Bank PLC(3) Vanquis Bank Limited(4) Santander UK PLC -v- Financial Ombudsman Service Limited (FOS) The post Barclays and others -v- Financial Ombudsman […]
  • Peter Barclay -v- Secretary for State for Transport and others
    Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWHC 1556 (Admin) Case numbers: (1) AC-2025-LON-003791 (2) AC-2025-LON-003839 Date: 23 June 2026 In the High Court of JusticeKing’s Bench DivisionPlanning Court Before :Mr Justice Mould Between : (1) Peter Barclay(2) Communities against Gatwick noise emissions – v – (1) Secretary of State for Transport (2) Gatwick Airport Limited The post Peter Barclay -v- Secretary for […]
  • Mullalley & Co. Limited -v- STO Limited and others
    Case No: HT-2024-000427 In the High Court of JusticeBusiness and Property Courts of England and WalesTechnology and Construction Court Date: 22 June 2026 Before : The Honourable Mr Justice Pepperall Between : Mullalley & Co. Limited – v – STO LimitedSTO SE & Co. KGaA The post Mullalley & Co. Limited -v- STO Limited and others appeared first on Courts […]
  • R -v- Mohammed Azim
    In the Crown Court at Wolverhampton 22 June 2026 R v Mohammed Azim Sentencing Remarks of Mr Justice Murray The post R -v- Mohammed Azim appeared first on Courts and Tribunals Judiciary.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

[post_title] was last updated on the 23rd June 2026

By Dom Watts

Dom Watts founded the Ministry of Injustice in July 2021. Dom is an IT Professional with 30+ years experience in Tier 1 Banking, Government, Defence, Healthcare and Global Blue Chips. Dom has no legal training and is not a lawyer but has previously consulted for a Magic Circle Law Firm. You can find Dom on X or Google.

Dom Watts publishes the Ministry of Injustice as a citizen journalist. The journalism exemption is detailed in the Data protection and journalism code of practice published by the ICO and Section 124 of the Data Protection Act 2018.

Section 2 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of truth. Section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of honest opinion. Section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of public interest. Section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the single publication rule.

Section 4a of The Limitation Act 1980 defines the time limit for actions for defamation or malicious falsehood as one year from the date on which the cause of action accrued.

Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 gives the right to freedom of expression. "This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers."

"Free speech encompasses the right to offend, and indeed to abuse another." - Para 43 Scottow v CPS [2020] EWHC 3421 (Admin)

"Free speech is a fundamental common law right" - Para 21 R v Shayler [2002] UKHL 11 [2003] 1 AC 247 per Lord Bingham and Para 42 Phillips -v- Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs [2024] EWHC 32 (Admin)

Dom is a member of The Free Speech Union

“A key issue here is the need to distinguish between conduct which, however objectionable, does not justify invoking the criminal law and conduct which crosses the line and results in criminal liability" - Para 31 R v O’Neill [2016] EWCA Crim 92 [2016]

“Harassment is generally understood to involve improper oppressive and unreasonable conduct that is targeted at an individual and calculated to produce alarm and distress” - Para 38 R v O’Neill [2016] EWCA Crim 92 [2016]

"The behaviour said to amount to harassment must reach a level of seriousness passing beyond irritations, annoyances....The gravity of the misconduct must be of an order which would sustain criminal liability" - Paras [40-44] Hayden v Dickenson [2020] EWHC 3291 (QB)

"If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything"

In 2002 Dom Watts was an unlikely consumer champion. The dad of three from Croydon took on the power and might of Kodak – and won...Dom on BBC Working Lunch

Rule of Law - Open Justice - Policing By Consent