Categories
Law

What is a Crown Servant ?

crown servant

A Crown Servant, in the United Kingdom, is an individual who is employed by the Crown or works within the civil service of the government.

The term “Crown servant” is not used in Scotland, where the equivalent term is “public servant”.

Crown Servants encompass a diverse range of professionals. They work across different government departments and agencies, contributing their expertise and skills to the functioning of the state.

Here are some examples of crown servants :-

  • Civil servants: Civil servants are employed by the government to carry out a variety of tasks, such as running government departments, providing public services, and advising ministers.
  • Police officers: Police officers are employed by the government to uphold the law and protect the public.
  • Members of the armed forces: Members of the armed forces are employed by the government to defend the country from attack.
  • Judges: Judges are employed by the government to preside over court cases.
  • Crown prosecutors: Crown prosecutors are employed by the government to prosecute criminal cases.
  • Diplomats: Diplomats are crown servants, and they represent the UK on the international stage. They negotiate treaties, build relationships with other countries, and promote UK interests abroad.

It’s important to note that although judges are employed by the government, they are separate from the executive branch of government, which includes the Prime Minister, Cabinet, and other government officials. This separation of powers helps to safeguard the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

One of the fundamental principles guiding the work of Crown Servants is their commitment to impartiality.

They are expected to perform their duties without bias or favouritism, treating all individuals and groups fairly and equitably. This principle of impartiality ensures that government decisions are made in the best interest of the public rather than personal or political interests.

Integrity is another core value upheld by Crown Servants.

They are expected to act ethically, demonstrating honesty, transparency, and accountability in their work. Maintaining the public’s trust is of utmost importance, and Crown Servants must adhere to high standards of conduct and behaviour.

Crown Servants serve at the pleasure of the Crown.

This means their employment can be terminated at the discretion of the Crown or its representatives. This authority provides flexibility in the management of the civil service, allowing the government to ensure that Crown Servants remain aligned with the goals and objectives of the administration.

The principle of Crown servants serving at the pleasure of the Crown is based on the idea that the Crown is the ultimate source of authority in the UK. This principle dates back to the days of absolute monarchy, when the King or Queen had absolute power over their subjects.

Although the UK is now a constitutional monarchy, the principle of Crown servants serving “at the pleasure of the Crown” has been retained.

Some people argue that serving at the pleasure of the Crown is an outdated and undemocratic principle that gives the government too much power. Others argue that it is an essential principle that helps to ensure the stability of the government and the country.

Crown Servants are expected to be politically neutral in their roles.

This ensures that their decisions and actions are not influenced by personal political beliefs. It is important to note that Crown Servants are distinct from political appointees or ministers who are chosen by the government

The role of Crown Servants in the United Kingdom is crucial in maintaining stability, efficiency, and continuity in the governance of the country.

Crown servants work tirelessly behind the scenes, implementing legislation, managing public services, providing legal advice, conducting diplomacy, and upholding law and order.

Crown servants provide impartial advice and support to government ministers, so that they can deliver public services in a fair and impartial way.

The UK has a long and proud tradition of public service, and Crown servants play a vital role in upholding this tradition.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

[post_title] was last updated on the 2nd June 2026

By Dom Watts

Dom Watts founded the Ministry of Injustice in July 2021. Dom is an IT Professional with 30+ years experience in Tier 1 Banking, Government, Defence, Healthcare and Global Blue Chips. Dom has no legal training and is not a lawyer but has previously consulted for a Magic Circle Law Firm. You can find Dom on X or Google.

Dom Watts publishes the Ministry of Injustice as a citizen journalist. The journalism exemption is detailed in the Data protection and journalism code of practice published by the ICO and Section 124 of the Data Protection Act 2018.

Section 2 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of truth. Section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of honest opinion. Section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of public interest. Section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the single publication rule.

Section 4a of The Limitation Act 1980 defines the time limit for actions for defamation or malicious falsehood as one year from the date on which the cause of action accrued.

Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 gives the right to freedom of expression. "This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers."

"Free speech encompasses the right to offend, and indeed to abuse another." - Para 43 Scottow v CPS [2020] EWHC 3421 (Admin)

"Free speech is a fundamental common law right" - Para 21 R v Shayler [2002] UKHL 11 [2003] 1 AC 247 per Lord Bingham and Para 42 Phillips -v- Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs [2024] EWHC 32 (Admin)

Dom is a member of The Free Speech Union

“A key issue here is the need to distinguish between conduct which, however objectionable, does not justify invoking the criminal law and conduct which crosses the line and results in criminal liability" - Para 31 R v O’Neill [2016] EWCA Crim 92 [2016]

“Harassment is generally understood to involve improper oppressive and unreasonable conduct that is targeted at an individual and calculated to produce alarm and distress” - Para 38 R v O’Neill [2016] EWCA Crim 92 [2016]

"The behaviour said to amount to harassment must reach a level of seriousness passing beyond irritations, annoyances....The gravity of the misconduct must be of an order which would sustain criminal liability" - Paras [40-44] Hayden v Dickenson [2020] EWHC 3291 (QB)

"If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything"

In 2002 Dom Watts was an unlikely consumer champion. The dad of three from Croydon took on the power and might of Kodak – and won...Dom on BBC Working Lunch

Rule of Law - Open Justice - Policing By Consent