Categories
Law

Constitutional Reform Act 2005

Ministry of Injustice - Law and Justice

The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 is a significant piece of legislation that introduced major changes to the constitutional framework of the United Kingdom.

A House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution produced a report with evidence in relation to the Constitutional Reform Act 2005

Explanatory notes to accompany the legislation were also published. The Act received Royal Assent on 24th March 2005.

The Act was intended to modernise and streamline the UK’s constitutional arrangements and strengthen the independence of the judiciary.

This article will examine the key changes introduced by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, why it is important, and other legislation it superseded. It will also focus on the creation of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), the establishment of the Supreme Court and the appointment of the heads of Criminal and Family justice.

Creation of the Judicial Appointments Commission

The creation of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) was one of the most significant changes introduced by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. The JAC is responsible for appointing judges to the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal, and other senior judicial positions. It was established to ensure that appointments were made on the basis of merit and not political considerations.

Before the creation of the JAC, judicial appointments were made by the Lord Chancellor. However, this process was criticized for being opaque and potentially open to political interference.

The creation of the JAC addressed these concerns by establishing an independent body to oversee the appointment of judges. The JAC has been praised for increasing the diversity of the judiciary, with more women and ethnic minorities appointed to senior judicial positions since its creation.

The JAC is made up of 15 Commissioners, including the Chairman, including the Lord Chief Justice, the President of the Supreme Court, and seven non-lawyers appointed by the Lord Chancellor. The Commission is responsible for advertising vacancies, shortlisting candidates, and making recommendations to the Lord Chancellor for appointment.

The Lord Chancellor is required to follow the Commission’s recommendations, except in exceptional circumstances.

The creation of the JAC has had a significant impact on the UK’s constitutional order.

It has helped to ensure that appointments to the judiciary are made on the basis of merit and not political considerations, which has helped to strengthen the independence of the judiciary.

Establishment of the Supreme Court

Another significant change introduced by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 was the establishment of the Supreme Court. Prior to the Act, the highest court in the UK was the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords.

This arrangement was criticized for blurring the lines between the judiciary and the legislature, as the House of Lords was also a legislative body.

The establishment of the Supreme Court was intended to address these concerns by creating a separate and independent court to hear the most important cases.

The Supreme Court is now the final court of appeal in the UK for civil cases, and for criminal cases in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

The Supreme Court is made up of 12 judges, who are appointed by an independent selection commission. The establishment of the Supreme Court has helped to strengthen the independence of the judiciary by creating a separate and distinct court to hear the most important cases. It has also helped to clarify the separation of powers between the judiciary and the legislature.

Appointment of the Heads of Criminal and Family Justice

The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 also introduced changes to the appointment of the heads of criminal and family justice.

Before the Act, the Lord Chancellor had the responsibility of appointing judges to the Court of Appeal and the High Court. The Lord Chancellor also had the authority to make appointments to the heads of the criminal and family justice systems.

However, the Act removed these powers from the Lord Chancellor and transferred them to the Lord Chief Justice.

The Lord Chief Justice became responsible for appointing the heads of the criminal and family justice systems, including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, the Master of the Rolls, the President of the King’s Bench Division, the President of the Family Division, and the Chancellor of the High Court.

This change was intended to strengthen the independence of the judiciary and remove any potential political influence from the appointment process.

The appointment of the heads of criminal and family justice is now made by a selection panel, which is chaired by the Lord Chief Justice and includes other senior members of the judiciary, as well as lay members. The panel makes recommendations to the Lord Chancellor, who must follow their advice unless there are exceptional circumstances.

The transfer of these powers from the Lord Chancellor to the Lord Chief Justice was a significant change that helped to further separate the judiciary from the executive. It ensured that appointments to the heads of the criminal and family justice systems were made on the basis of merit and not political considerations.

Superseded Legislation

The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 superseded several pieces of legislation, including the Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2004, the Supreme Court Act 1981, and the Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876.

The Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2004 was repealed and replaced by the provisions of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 that established the JAC.

The Supreme Court Act 1981 was also repealed, and the Supreme Court was established as a separate court under the new Act.

Finally, the Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876 was repealed, and the judicial functions of the House of Lords were transferred to the Supreme Court.

A number of existing legislations were also affected, such as the Habeas Corpus Act 1679 and the Ecclesiastical Licences Act 1533.

The Oath of the Lord Chancellor

Finally, the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 Part 2 Section 17 introduced changes to the oath taken by the Lord Chancellor.

“I,     , do swear that in the office of Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain I will respect the rule of law, defend the independence of the judiciary and discharge my duty to ensure the provision of resources for the efficient and effective support of the courts for which I am responsible. So help me God.”

Oath of the Lord Chancellor

Before the Act, the Lord Chancellor was required to swear an oath of allegiance to the King and to promise to uphold the judiciary’s independence. However, the Lord Chancellor was also a member of the executive and had political responsibilities.

The Act introduced a new oath for the Lord Chancellor, which removed any reference to political responsibilities.

The new oath requires the Lord Chancellor to swear to respect the rule of law, defend the independence of the judiciary, and ensure that justice is accessible to all. This change was intended to clarify the Lord Chancellor’s role as a guardian of the judiciary’s independence and to remove any potential conflicts of interest.

The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 was a significant piece of legislation that introduced major changes to the constitutional framework of the UK.

These changes have helped to strengthen the independence of the judiciary and clarify the separation of powers between the judiciary and the executive.

Constitutional Reform Act 2005 PDFDownload

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law

Burden and Standard of Proof

burden and standard

Burden and standard of proof are key concepts in the UK legal system that relate to the level of evidence required to prove a case.

The burden of proof refers to the responsibility of the party making an assertion to provide evidence to support it, while the standard of proof is the degree of certainty needed to prove that assertion.

In this article, we will examine the history and examples of burden and standard of proof in UK law.

History

The origins of the burden and standard of proof can be traced back to the Roman law principle of ‘onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat,’ which translates to ‘the burden of proof is on the one who asserts, not on the one who denies.’

This principle was adopted into English law in the 17th century, where it became a fundamental part of the common law system.

In the 18th century, the standard of proof was established as ‘proof beyond a reasonable doubt’ in criminal cases, which required the prosecution to prove their case to a high level of certainty.

In civil cases, the standard of proof was set as ‘balance of probabilities‘ which required the plaintiff to prove their case on the balance of probabilities, i.e., that it was more likely than not that their version of events was correct.

Burden and standard of proof are important in both criminal and civil cases in the UK legal system.

Criminal Cases

In criminal cases, the prosecution must prove their case ‘beyond a reasonable doubt,’ which means that the evidence must be so strong that there is no other logical explanation for the defendant’s guilt.

This is often referred to as the 99% test.

This high standard of proof is necessary because the consequences of a criminal conviction can be severe, including imprisonment or even the death penalty.

One example of the burden and standard of proof in criminal cases is R v Woolmington (1935), where the defendant was charged with the murder of his wife.

The prosecution had the burden of proving that the defendant had killed his wife intentionally or recklessly, and they had to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant claimed that he had accidentally shot his wife while cleaning his gun, and the jury ultimately found him not guilty because the prosecution had failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Civil Cases including Family

In civil cases, the burden and standard of proof are different. The plaintiff has the burden of proving their case on the balance of probabilities, i.e., that it is more likely than not that their version of events is correct.

This is often referred to as the 51% test.

This lower standard of proof is necessary because the consequences of a civil case are less severe than a criminal case, usually involving monetary damages or injunctions.

An example of the burden and standard of proof in civil cases is the case of Re H and Others (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) (1996).

The case concerned allegations of sexual abuse against children in care, and the question was whether the standard of proof in such cases should be ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ or the lower standard of ‘balance of probabilities.’

The court held that in cases involving serious allegations such as sexual abuse, the standard of proof should be ‘balance of probabilities,’ but the evidence must be ‘clear, cogent and convincing’ to establish liability.

In conclusion, the burden and standard of proof are essential concepts in the UK legal system that ensure that justice is served.

The burden of proof is on the party making an assertion, and the standard of proof depends on the type of case, with ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ required in criminal cases and ‘balance of probabilities’ required in civil cases.

These principles have evolved over centuries of legal practice and are a critical part of ensuring fairness in the administration of justice.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law Legal Professionals

HMCTS

Ministry of Injustice - Law and Justice

His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) is an executive agency of the UK government, operating under the Ministry of Justice.

The Lord Chancellor, The Rt Hon Shabana Mahmood MP, heads the Ministry of Justice as the Secretary of State for Justice.

HMCTS Complaints Procedure

You might want to make a complaint to HMCTS. The HMCTS complaint process looks at how your case was handled by their staff.

HMCTS are not able to change the decision in your case or investigate how a judge or magistrate acted towards you.

HMCTS uses the Opinions, Praise, Treatment, Incident and Complaints system (OPTIC) which is the HMCTS feedback database/system used to record all customer feedback.

To complain about the HMCTS:

  • complete the online complaints form
  • speak to a member of staff in their buildings who will record your feedback
  • contact the courts or tribunals by email, phone or in writing

If you remain unsatisfied at the end of the complaints process, you can also ask your member of Parliament to refer your case to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman.

HMCTS ignore complaints

I raised an online complaint with HMCTS about the shambolic Brighton Family Court and Sussex Family Team on the 16th January 2023 some 55 working days ago (correct as 31st March 2023).

Confirmation email of complaint from HMCTS OPTIC 19th January 2023

I have previously attempted to raise a complaint with Sussex Family Court (in person, by phone, by email) but no one wants to communicate or accept any responsibility.

Sussex Family Court and its staff fail to communicate, list hearings, process applications, deal with complaints and struggle with basic administration. A senior judge told me they are short staffed and are “doing their best”.

This court and its staff are clearly “interfering with the smooth administration of justice” and are not fit for purpose.

HMCTS are in effect in contempt of court by their actions/inactions.

HMCTS claim to respond within 10 working days.

There has been absolutely no response despite having chased them 3 times with emails to [email protected]. Either my complaint is lost, I am being deliberately being ignored or they are still busy coming up with excuses ?

There are no published phone numbers for HMCTS and the only email addresses listed are [email protected] or [email protected].

There is no way I can see of contacting HMCTS.

On the 22nd March 2023 in utter desperation I sent the following to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) Data protection Officer (DPO).

Dear MoJ DPO

https://complain-about-a-court-or-tribunal.form.service.justice.gov.uk/privacy

Do you have any contact details for the Complaints or “HMCTS optic” team ? I cannot find an email address or telephone number for the complaints team.

I am concerned that they are either deliberately ignoring me or my personal data has fallen into a “worm hole”.

I would therefore also like to make a SAR. I assume this can be done by email to you instead of by post to Disclosure Team which seems an antiquated approach.

Your help would be much appreciated.

Email to MoJ DPO [email protected] / [email protected]

HMCTS OPTIC Privacy Policy

The HMCTS OPTIC Privacy Policy clearly states that the data protection officer can be contacted at [email protected]

HMCTS OPTIC Privacy Policy 22nd March 2023

This is incorrect as emails to that address are undelivered. That email address does not exist.

Undelivered email to [email protected]

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) entry for Z5679958 lists the DPO as [email protected].

Ministry of Justice ICO Registration reference:  Z5679958 24th March 2023

Is this an innocent mistake or further evidence of institutional incompetence ?

To be really “petty”, Petty should have a capital P as well. Hopefully they will update their website.

The MoJ’s DPO has a duty under GDPR to publish accurate information.

The requirement to send a Subject Access Request (SAR) to a postal address is also dubious and unnecessary as an email should suffice.

HMCTS OPTIC Privacy Policy SAR by Post 22nd March 2023

Update 24th March 2023 : The MoJ Data Access Team [email protected] have responded acknowledging the SAR. It seems, as suspected, you can apply by email and save a stamp.

However, they haven’t updated their email template and still refer to Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service and Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service.

What an insult to his majesty the King. I have asked them to update this.

Dear Mr Watts

SUBJECT: Subject Access Request

Thank you for your email below in which you asked for information from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).

Your request has been handled in line with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Data Protection Act (DPA) 2018 as a Subject Access Request (SAR) for your personal information.

In order for us to process your request we require acceptable proof of your identity.

  • Verifying Identity

Copies of two types of proof of identity. These can be a copy of a recent utility bill (dated within the last three months) and a copy of the photograph page of your passport or driving licence.

  • Search Location/Clarification

The MoJ is a large department with many functions and it will greatly assist us in providing you with the exact information you require if you are able to:

  1. Specify the information or processing activities your request relates to
  2. Provide more details that will help us locate the requested information; such as the context in which your information may have been processed and the likely dates when processing occurred

For your information, in the context of SARs, the MoJ consists of:-

  • Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service
  • Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service
  • The Office of the Public Guardian,
  • The Legal Aid Agency, and
  • A large MoJ “HQ”

On receipt of acceptable proof of I.D. we will continue to process your request.

Yours sincerely

Disclosure Team

Disclosure & Library Team,
Information Services Division
Security and Information Group

MoJ Disclosure Team 24th March 2023

I still await a response from the MoJ to resolve my complaint along with a detailed explanation for the inexcusable HMCTS tardiness.

In the meantime check out our article on the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

Who are HMCTS ?

His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) is an executive agency of the UK government, operating under the Ministry of Justice. It is responsible for administering the court system in England and Wales, providing support to the courts, tribunals, and other judicial bodies to ensure their effective and efficient operation.

The history of HMCTS reflects a drive to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the justice system, through the merger of the Court Service and the Tribunals Service in 2011. This created a more streamlined and efficient system that is better equipped to meet the needs of the public, under the oversight of the Ministry of Justice.

The annual budget of HMCTS is significant, reflecting the importance of the services it provides to the public. In 2021/22, the agency’s budget was £1.8 billion, which was a decrease from the previous year’s budget of £1.9 billion. The reduction in funding was due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which forced the agency to scale back some of its activities.

HMCTS is one of the largest employers in the UK justice system, with a workforce of around 28,000 staff. The agency employs a diverse range of people, including court staff, judges, legal advisers, and administrative staff, overseen by the Ministry of Justice.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law Police

Crime Statistics By Area

crime stats

What is a Crime ?

In the UK, a crime is defined as any act or omission that is prohibited by law and is punishable by the state through fines, imprisonment, or other penalties.. Crimes can range from minor offences, such as motoring/traffic offences or petty theft, to serious crimes, such as assault, murder, or drug trafficking.

What is a Criminal ?

Under UK law, a criminal is defined as a person who has committed a criminal offence. The specific offenses that are considered criminal under UK law are defined by various statutes, including the Theft Act 1968, the Fraud Act 2006, and the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, among others.

What are Crime Statistics ?

Crime statistics in the UK refer to the collection and analysis of data on crime rates, patterns, and trends across the country. These statistics are usually compiled by government agencies, such as the Office for National Statistics (ONS), and are used to inform policies and strategies for reducing crime and ensuring public safety.

The ONS are the UK’s largest independent producer of official statistics and its recognised national statistical institute. They e are responsible for collecting and publishing statistics related to the economy, population and society at national, regional and local levels. They also conduct the census in England and Wales every 10 years.

Some commonly reported crime statistics in the UK include the overall number of crimes recorded, the number of specific types of crimes (such as violent crime or burglary), and the crime rate per capita.

These statistics may also include information on the demographics of offenders and victims, as well as the locations and times of reported crimes.

Where can I find Crime Stats online ?

There are multiple crime stat resources available and these are a selection of the most popular :-

You can check crime in your area at Police.uk

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) also publish crime data

Crime in England and Wales: year ending March 2024 is the latest report

Crime in England and Wales: Police Force Area data tables are published in excel format

“The number of police recorded crimes, percentage change from previous year and rate per 1,000 population by offence group, firearms, knife and sharp instrument, fraud and anti-social behaviour offences by Police Force Area.”

ukcrimestats who say they are the leading crime and postcode data research and analysis platform, also publish crime data that can be searched in a variety of ways :-

By Postcode Area

By Neighbourhood

The Metropolitan Police (Met Police) publish Stats and Data on their website.

Sussex Police publish Sussex Crime Stats which is searchable by neighbourhood.

ADT security provide an interactive crime map

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law

Pro bono

pro bon

Pro bono, a Latin phrase meaning “for the public good,” refers to the provision of legal services on a voluntary, free-of-charge basis to individuals and organisations who cannot afford to pay for legal assistance.

In short, if you cannot afford a lawyer and do not qualify for legal aid, then you may be able to find a pro bono lawyer (solicitor / barrister) or law firm.

The National Pro Bono Centre was established in 2010 with the aim of bringing together charities dedicated to the provision of pro bono legal services and access to justice.

LawWorks is a charity working in England and Wales to connect volunteer lawyers with people in need of legal advice, who are not eligible for legal aid and cannot afford to pay and with the not-for-profit organisations that support them.

In the UK, pro bono work is an essential part of the legal profession, with lawyers, solicitors, barristers, and law firms providing their services to those in need.

The concept of pro bono dates back to ancient Rome, where lawyers were expected to offer their services for free to the poor.

The practice was formalized in the US in the early 1900s when lawyers began offering their services to immigrants and the working class.

In the UK, pro bono work has been a part of the legal profession for many years, and its importance has grown significantly in recent years.

There are several types of pro bono work in the UK, including:

  1. Legal advice clinics: These are typically run by law firms and provide free legal advice to individuals on a wide range of legal issues, including family, housing, employment, and immigration.
  2. Pro bono cases: Lawyers and barristers may take on pro bono cases, representing clients who cannot afford to pay for legal services. These cases can range from civil litigation, including family law, to criminal defence work.
  3. Public interest litigation: This involves bringing legal action on behalf of groups or individuals who cannot afford to pay for legal services. Public interest litigation can cover a range of issues, including human rights, environmental law, and social justice.
  4. Law school clinics: Many law schools in the UK run pro bono clinics, where law students provide legal assistance to individuals and organisations.
  5. Pro bono work for charities: Lawyers and law firms may provide pro bono services to charities and non-profit organisations, helping them with legal issues such as employment law, contract law, and governance.

Pro bono work is essential in the UK, where legal aid is becoming increasingly restricted.

As the cost of legal services continues to rise, many individuals and organisations cannot afford to pay for legal assistance, leaving them at a disadvantage when it comes to accessing justice. Pro bono work helps to bridge this gap, ensuring that everyone has access to legal services, regardless of their financial situation.

In conclusion, pro bono work is a vital part of the legal profession in the UK, providing free legal services to individuals and organisations who cannot afford to pay for legal assistance.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Police

Met Police

Baroness Casey of Blackstock DBE CB has completed and published today (31st March 2023) her report The Baroness Casey Review into the standards of behaviour and internal culture of the Metropolitan Police Service (Met Police).

You can read the reports into the Metropolitan Police Service here :-

Baroness Casey Review Final Report: March 2023 (PDF, 2642KB)

Baroness Casey’s Report on Misconduct: October 2022 (PDF, 596KB)

Metropolitan PEEL Assessment 2023–2025

The Metropolitan Police remains along with two other forces also in special measures. Devon and Cornwall Police and Nottinghamshire Police.

For the latest Met Police news please see out Police News pages.

Call 999 if:

  • a serious offence is in progress or has just been committed
  • someone is in immediate danger or harm
  • property is in danger of being damaged
  • a serious disruption to the public is likely

Call 101 for non-emergency enquiries. You can also Report a Crime Online

Racism, Misogyny and Homophobia with ‘Rot’ at its Heart

In 1829 Sir Robert Peel established the Metropolitan Police in London, the first professional centrally organised police force.

194 years later the Met Police reputation is in ruins. The Metropolitan Police can only be described as an utter disgrace, embarrassment to the world and totally unfit for purpose.

Policing by consent indicates that the legitimacy of policing in the eyes of the public is based upon a consensus of support that follows from transparency about their powers, their integrity in exercising those powers and their accountability for doing so

The Casey report states that the Met Police ranks are riven with racism, misogyny and homophobia with ‘rot’ at its heart.

  • Alleged rapists went free after fridges broke down, destroying all the evidence inside meaning all the cases had to be dropped. Some fridges were so full it took three officers to shut them and one was also being used to store lunch alongside forensic samples;
  • A Muslim officer had bacon put in his shoes by a colleague, a Sikh officer had his beard trimmed and another officer had his turban put into a shoe box because officers ‘thought it was funny’. In one instance a black guard was referred to as a ‘gate monkey’ by colleagues;
  • Female officers were targeted by men for sex. Some felt pressure to sleep with colleagues to be popular. One officer was even allegedly sexually assaulted in a shower. One woman said a senior officer masturbated in front of her in the communal changing room.
  • ‘Pranks’ included bags of urine being thrown at cars, sex toys slipped into coffee mugs, male officers flicking each other’s genitals and an animal being trapped in an officer’s locker. There is widespread bullying at the Yard, with a fifth of staff being victimised;
  • Homophobia is rife. One gay officer said colleague spread false rumours that he had slept with senior officers to get ahead and made up claims he was taking drugs. Colleagues were accused of making malicious complaints about gay people and even considering using stop and search to target them. One said: ‘I am scared of the police. I don’t trust my own organisation’;
  • The parliamentary and diplomatic protection unit where Couzens and Carrick worked is described as a ‘dark corner’ of the Met known as ‘overtime command’. Officers often join to pay for weddings and top up their pensions.  he review found that officers ‘game the system’ to cash in on overtime and other bonuses, wasting public money on unnecessary overseas training trips and hotel rooms.
  • In the ‘boys’ club’, senior armed officers have competitions to see if they can make female colleagues cry and put up posters in common areas showing female firearms officers carrying mops, irons and kettles instead of weapons. One officer said: ‘It’s the most toxic, racist, sexist place I’ve ever worked – it’s just an unbelievable place.’ 
Daily Mail 21st March 2023

Met Police officer ‘repeatedly raped’ by colleague and staff urinated on: Key findings of Baroness Casey’s damning review into force

Sky News 21st March 2023

Met chief admits force has racism problem but rejects it’s institutional

BBC News 21st March 2023

Officers in Met’s armed police units ‘game the system’ to cash in on overtime and expenses

The Telegraph 21st March 2023
Suella Braverman Home Secretary
Sir Mark Rowley Metropolitan Police
baroness-casey-review-march-2023Download
baroness-casey-review-interim-report-on-misconductDownload

Check out our articles on Sussex Police, Policing by Consent, Police Impartiality, Police Public Confidence and Engagement, Police Professional Standards Department, IOPC, Crime Reporting, What is a Police and Crime Commissioner ?, Policing, Police News, Two Tiered Policing, Thought Police, Police Digital Service, Knowledge Hub – Police Digital Service, Wasting Police Time, Police Community Support Officers (PCSO), Met Police, Chief Constable Jo Shiner, R v Sussex Justices and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law

Reasonable Person Test

reasonable person

What is a Reasonable Person ?

The reasonable person test is a legal concept used in UK law, which seeks to establish a standard of conduct that a hypothetical reasonable person would exhibit in a given situation. It is also known as the objective standard test or the reasonable man/woman test.

What is the Reasonable Person Test ?

The Reasonable Person test is used to determine whether a defendant has breached their duty of care in a particular situation, for example, in negligence cases. The court asks what a reasonable person would have done in the same circumstances, taking into account the defendant’s knowledge and experience at the time of the incident.

The test was developed in response to the need for a standard to measure the conduct of individuals in society. It was seen as a way to ensure that people acted reasonably in their interactions with others and did not cause harm through their actions.

History of the Reasonable Person Test

The history of the reasonable person test began in the old English law and was first used in a civil lawsuit Vaughn v. Menlove in 1837.

The defendant had stacked hay on his rental property in a manner prone to spontaneous ignition. This was despite being repeatedly warned about the danger over the course of five weeks.

This determined that a reasonable person would not have stacked hay in a dangerous manner next to a neighbours’ structure (as the defendant in that case did) because of the risk of fire.

The Man on the Clapham Omnibus is a hypothetical ordinary and reasonable person used by the courts in English law where it is necessary to decide whether a party has acted as a reasonable person would.

The phrase was reportedly first put to legal use in a judgment by Sir Richard Henn Collins MR in the 1903 English Court of Appeal libel case, McQuire v. Western Morning News

Refinement

Over time, the reasonable person test has been refined and adapted to suit different legal contexts.

In the UK, the test is now a fundamental principle of negligence law and is used extensively in other areas of law, such as criminal law, family law and contract law.

In practice, the test is used by judges and juries to evaluate the conduct of defendants and to determine whether they have acted in a reasonable manner.

The test is a flexible one, which takes into account the particular circumstances of each case. This means that the standard of conduct required of the reasonable person may vary depending on the situation.

Overall, the reasonable person test is an important legal concept that helps to ensure that people act reasonably and with due care in their interactions with others. It is a key component of UK law and is used extensively in legal proceedings.

Check out our related articles on Rule of Law, Open Justice, What is Law, Is the Law Black and White ?, Abuse of Process, What Does Lady Justice Symbolise ?, McKenzie Friend, Can a Judge Direct a Jury to Find a Defendant Not Guilty ?, Law Society, Law Commission, McKenzie Friend Right of Audience, Solicitors, Solicitors Regulation Authority, Barristers, Bar Council of England and Wales, Bar Standards Board, Contra Mundum, R v Sussex Justices, Police Impartiality and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law

Is your website legal ?

legal

In the United Kingdom, websites must comply with several legal requirements to operate legally.

The three main pieces of legislation governing websites in the UK are the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the Data Protection Act 2018, and the Companies Act 2006.

In addition, public bodies and the government have specific requirements regarding the information they must publish on their websites.

In this article, we will explore what information must be included on a website to comply with UK law and the specific requirements for public bodies and government websites.

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Data Protection Act 2018

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a regulation of the European Union that became effective on May 25, 2018. The GDPR governs the collection, processing, and storage of personal data by companies operating within the EU. The GDPR applies to all companies that handle personal data, regardless of their size or location.

The Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA) is the UK’s implementation of the GDPR. It provides further detail on how the GDPR is applied in the UK and sets out specific requirements for companies operating within the country. The DPA replaced the Data Protection Act 1998 and was designed to modernize data protection laws in the UK.

To comply with the GDPR and DPA, websites must include several pieces of information.

First, websites must provide a privacy policy that details how personal data is collected, processed, and stored. The privacy policy must include information on the legal basis for processing personal data, the categories of personal data collected, and how long personal data will be stored.

Second, websites must obtain consent from users before collecting, processing, or storing personal data. Consent must be explicit and freely given, and users must have the right to withdraw their consent at any time.

Third, websites must provide users with access to their personal data upon request. Users have the right to view their personal data, request corrections to their personal data, and request the deletion of their personal data.

Companies Act 2006

The Companies Act 2006 is a UK law that governs the operation of companies within the country. The act sets out specific requirements for companies’ websites, including information that must be displayed on the site.

All companies must include the following information on their website:

  • Company name, registration number, and registered office address
  • Contact information, including email address and telephone number
  • The names of the company’s directors
  • Information on the company’s share capital, including the number of shares and the rights attached to each class of share
  • Information on any charges or mortgages held over the company’s property or assets

In addition to this basic information, public companies must also include the following information:

  • Details of the company’s auditor, including their name and address
  • Information on any political donations made by the company
  • Information on the company’s remuneration policy

Public Bodies and Government Websites

Public bodies and the government have specific requirements regarding the information they must publish on their websites. These requirements are set out in the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Transparency Code 2015.

The Freedom of Information Act 2000 requires public bodies to provide information upon request, and many public bodies choose to publish information proactively on their websites.

The Transparency Code 2015 sets out specific requirements for the publication of information by local authorities.

Public bodies and government websites must include the following information:

  • Contact information, including email address and telephone number
  • Information on the organisation’s structure and governance
  • Budgets and spending information, including details of contracts and tenders
  • Details of any regulatory or inspection reports
  • Policies and procedures, including those relating to data protection and freedom of information
  • Details of any consultations or public engagements

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law

Cookie Law

cookies

In the digital age, privacy has become a growing and valid concern for individuals and organisations alike.

One aspect of online privacy that has gained particular attention is the use of cookies on websites.

The European Union (EU) established regulations to protect user privacy, known as the EU Cookie Policy.

This article will provide an overview of the EU Cookie Policy, including its applicability in the UK, what cookies are, who must get cookie consent, and the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (PECR).

What is the EU Cookie Policy?

The EU Cookie Policy, also known as the EU Cookie Law or the Cookie Directive, is a regulation implemented by the European Union to protect the privacy of website users. The regulation requires website operators to obtain explicit consent from users before storing or retrieving any information from their device using cookies. The regulation applies to all websites that are accessible to users in the EU, regardless of whether the website operator is based in the EU.

The EU Cookie Policy was introduced in May 2011 as an amendment to the EU’s Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive (2002/58/EC). The purpose of the amendment was to provide more specific guidelines regarding the use of cookies and other similar technologies.

Does the EU Cookie Policy still apply in the UK?

The EU Cookie Policy continues to apply in the UK, despite the UK’s departure from the EU. This is because the EU Cookie Policy was implemented into UK law through the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (PECR).

The PECR is a UK law that regulates the use of cookies and similar technologies. The PECR has been amended to reflect changes to the EU Cookie Policy, and it continues to apply in the UK post-Brexit.

What are cookies?

Cookies are small text files that are stored on a user’s device when they browse a website. Cookies are used to remember a user’s preferences or actions, such as login credentials or shopping cart items. They can also be used to track a user’s browsing behaviour, such as the pages they visit or the links they click on.

There are two types of cookie: session cookies and persistent cookies. Session cookies are temporary cookies that are deleted when a user closes their browser. Persistent cookies are cookies that remain on a user’s device until they expire or are deleted.

Who must get cookie consent?

Under the EU Cookie Policy, website operators must obtain explicit consent from users before storing or retrieving any information from their device using cookies. This means that website operators must inform users about the use of cookies on their website and obtain their consent before using cookies.

The PECR applies to all UK organizations that use cookies and similar technologies. This includes businesses, charities, and public sector organizations. Website operators must ensure that their use of cookies complies with the PECR, regardless of their size or sector.

What is the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR)?

The Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) is a UK law that regulates the use of cookies and similar technologies. The PECR was introduced in 2003 as a UK implementation of the EU’s Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive (2002/58/EC).

The PECR sets out specific requirements for website operators regarding the use of cookies. Website operators must:

  • Inform users about the use of cookies on their website;
  • Obtain explicit consent from users before using cookies; and
  • Provide clear and comprehensive information about the purpose of the cookies.

The PECR also includes provisions relating to electronic marketing, including email marketing and SMS marketing. The PECR requires organizations to obtain prior consent continue from users before sending them electronic marketing messages, and it provides guidelines for obtaining consent and providing opt-out mechanisms.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is responsible for enforcing the PECR in the UK. The ICO is an independent authority that promotes and enforces data protection and privacy laws in the UK. The ICO provides guidance to organizations on how to comply with the PECR and investigates complaints of non-compliance.

Organizations that fail to comply with the PECR may face enforcement action from the ICO, including fines and other penalties. The ICO has the power to issue fines of up to £500,000 for serious breaches of the PECR.

The Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) sit alongside the Data Protection Act 2018 and the UK GDPR.

The EU Cookie Policy is an important regulation that aims to protect the privacy of website users. The regulation requires website operators to obtain explicit consent from users before using cookies or similar technologies to store or retrieve information from their device.

The Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) is a UK law that implements the EU Cookie Policy in the UK. The PECR sets out specific requirements for website operators regarding the use of cookies and provides guidelines for electronic marketing.

All organisations that use cookies or similar technologies must ensure that their use complies with the PECR. This includes informing users about the use of cookies, obtaining explicit consent, and providing clear and comprehensive information about the purpose of the cookies. Failure to comply with the PECR may result in enforcement action from the ICO, including fines and other penalties.

As technology continues to evolve, it is important for organizations to stay up-to-date with the latest privacy regulations and guidelines. By complying with the EU Cookie Policy and the PECR, organizations can protect the privacy of their users and avoid the risk of non-compliance.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law

Could AI replace Lawyers ?

artificial intelligence (ai)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been making waves in the legal industry over the past few years. Many experts believe that AI technology could eventually replace lawyers, solicitors, and barristers.

In a previous article we considered Could AI replace judges ?

In this article, we will explore the potential benefits and disadvantages of AI replacing lawyers, as well as discuss the role of solicitors and barristers in the legal industry.

Before we dive into the benefits and disadvantages of AI replacing lawyers, it’s important to understand the difference between solicitors and barristers. In the UK legal system, solicitors are lawyers who provide legal advice and services to clients, while barristers are lawyers who specialize in representing clients in court. While both solicitors and barristers are lawyers, they perform different roles within the legal system.

Benefits of AI Replacing Lawyers

One of the most significant benefits of AI replacing lawyers is the potential cost savings for clients. AI can perform many of the tasks that lawyers typically handle, such as document review and contract analysis, at a much lower cost. This could make legal services more affordable for clients who may not have been able to afford them before.

Another benefit of AI replacing lawyers is increased efficiency. AI can perform tasks much faster than humans, which could help speed up the legal process. This could be especially beneficial in cases where time is of the essence, such as in criminal cases or high-stakes litigation.

AI also has the potential to be more accurate than humans. Lawyers are prone to errors, but AI can be programmed to perform tasks with a high degree of accuracy. This could help prevent mistakes that could lead to costly legal disputes.

Finally, AI can analyse vast amounts of data much more quickly than humans. This could be beneficial in cases where large amounts of data need to be analysed, such as in complex litigation or regulatory investigations.

Disadvantages of AI Replacing Lawyers

One of the main disadvantages of AI replacing lawyers is the potential loss of jobs. If AI technology becomes advanced enough to perform many of the tasks that lawyers typically handle, it could lead to a significant reduction in the number of lawyers, solicitors, and barristers needed in the legal industry. This could lead to job losses and could make it more difficult for individuals to pursue a career in law.

Another disadvantage of AI replacing lawyers is the potential for bias. AI systems are only as unbiased as the data they are trained on. If the data used to train an AI system is biased, the system itself will be biased. This could lead to unfair outcomes in legal cases, which could be detrimental to individuals who are seeking justice.

AI also lacks empathy and emotional intelligence, which are essential qualities for lawyers, solicitors, and barristers. These professionals must be able to connect with their clients on a personal level and understand their emotions and motivations. AI cannot do this, which could make it difficult for AI systems to fully replace lawyers.

Finally, AI systems can be hacked or manipulated. If an AI system is compromised, it could lead to serious legal consequences. This could be especially problematic in cases where sensitive data is being analysed, such as in criminal investigations.

What is intelligence and why is it different to artificial intelligence ?

Intelligence is a term used to describe the ability to acquire, understand, and apply knowledge and skills to solve problems, reason, and learn from experience. It encompasses a range of cognitive abilities, including memory, perception, attention, reasoning, and problem-solving.

Artificial intelligence (AI), on the other hand, is a branch of computer science that focuses on creating machines that can perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as learning, reasoning, and problem-solving. AI systems use algorithms and statistical models to analyse data, recognize patterns, and make decisions based on that data.

While both intelligence and AI involve the ability to solve problems and learn from experience, there are some key differences between the two. One of the most significant differences is that human intelligence is often characterized by flexibility and adaptability. Humans are able to learn from a wide range of experiences, apply that knowledge to new situations, and adjust their behaviour accordingly. AI systems, on the other hand, are designed to perform specific tasks and are less adaptable to new situations.

Another difference between intelligence and AI is that human intelligence is often characterized by creativity and originality. Humans are capable of generating new ideas and thinking outside the box, which is something that AI systems have not yet been able to replicate.

Finally, human intelligence is also characterized by emotions and social skills. Humans are able to understand and navigate complex social situations, which is something that AI systems have not yet been able to replicate.

In summary, while both intelligence and AI involve the ability to solve problems and learn from experience, there are key differences between the two. Human intelligence is characterized by flexibility, creativity, and social skills, while AI is focused on performing specific tasks using algorithms and statistical models.

Role of Solicitors and Barristers

While AI has the potential to replace lawyers in some areas, it’s unlikely that it will fully replace solicitors and barristers anytime soon.

These professionals bring unique skills and expertise to the legal industry that AI cannot replicate.

Solicitors provide legal advice and services to clients. They help clients navigate the legal system and ensure that their rights are protected. Solicitors also prepare legal documents, such as contracts and wills, and represent clients in legal negotiations.

Barristers, on the other hand, specialize in representing clients in court. They are experts in advocacy and have a deep understanding of the legal system.

Barristers work closely with solicitors to provide clients with the best possible legal representation.

Check out the related articles on the Judicial Guidance on Artificial Intelligence, Could AI Replace Judges ?, Judiciary, Government Legal Department (GLD), Attorney General, Solicitor General, Lady Chief Justice, Lord Chancellor, Justice Secretary, Rule of Law, Open Justice, Law, Is the Law Black and White ?, Government Legal Department, Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), Abuse of Process, What Does Lady Justice Symbolise ?, McKenzie Friend, Law Society, Law Commission, McKenzie Friend Right of Audience, Solicitors, Solicitors Regulation Authority, Barristers, Bar Council of England and Wales, Bar Standards Board, R v Sussex Justices, Police Impartiality and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Rule of Law - Open Justice - Policing By Consent