Categories
Family Law

What is the Family Justice Board ?

Family Justice Board

The Family Justice Board in England and Wales plays a crucial role in shaping the family justice system and ensuring positive outcomes for children. Here are the key points:

  1. Purpose and Role:
    • The Family Justice Board aims to improve the performance of the family justice system.
    • It ensures the best possible outcomes for children who interact with the system.
    • The Board takes a cross-system approach and is jointly chaired by Ministers from the Ministry of Justice and the Department for Education.
  2. Membership:
  3. Sub-Groups:
    • The Board has sub-groups:
      • Family Justice Council: Provides independent expert advice.
      • FJYPB: Represents young people’s perspectives.
      • Performance Improvement Sub-Group: Analyzes performance data and recommends improvements.
  4. Open Letters:
  5. Monitoring and Direction:

For more details, you can refer to the official GOV.UK page.

Relationship with the Family Justice Council

The Family Justice Council operates independently of the Family Justice Board. As a critical friend to the Family Justice Board it provide it with expert advice, from an inter-disciplinary perspective, on the operation and reform of the family justice system in England and Wales.

Members

The Family Justice Board in England and Wales comprises senior stakeholders from across the family justice system. Here are some of the current members as of 28th June 2024:

  1. Lord Bellamy KC (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Ministry of Justice) – Co-Chair
  2. David Johnston MP (Minister for Children and Families) – Co-Chair
  3. Nigel Brown (Chief Executive, Cafcass Cymru)
  4. Nick Goodwin (Chief Executive, HMCTS)
  5. Albert Heaney (Director, Social Services, Welsh Government)
  6. Sally Jenkins (Head of Children’s Services, Association of Directors of Social Services Cymru)
  7. Sophie Langdale and Fram Oram (Director, Children’s Social Care – Practice and Workforce, DfE)
  8. Ed Lidington (Director, Court Recovery, Criminal and Family Justice, MOJ)
  9. Helen Lincoln (Executive Director for Children, Families & Education, Essex County Council)
  10. Yvette Stanley (National Director, Social Care, Ofsted)
  11. Jacky Tiotto (Chief Executive, Cafcass)
  12. Isabelle Trowler (Chief Social Worker for Children and Families)
  13. Sir Andrew McFarlane (President of the Family Division) – Observer
  14. A representative from the Family Justice Young People’s Board also participates.

Please note that this list includes key members, and there may be additional stakeholders involved.

Local Family Justice Boards (LFJB)

There are several Local Family Justice Boards (LFJB) including the Sussex Family Justice Board which is the largest. A highly dubious family justice cartel that operates in Sussex.

Local Family Justice Boards (LFJB) were established to support the work of the Family Justice Board by bringing together the key local agencies, including decision makers and front-line staff, to achieve significant improvement in the performance of the family justice system in their local areas.

To contact an LFJB or for more information, please email LFJB Enquiries.

Family Justice Board

Minutes of the Family Justice Board

Check out our related articles on Rule of Law, Open Justice, Is the Law Black and White ?, Civil Justice Council, Youth Justice Board, Abuse of Process, What Does Lady Justice Symbolise ?, McKenzie Friend, Wasted Costs Order, Can a Judge Direct a Jury to Find a Defendant Not Guilty ?, Law Society, Law Commission, McKenzie Friend Right of Audience, Solicitors, Solicitors Regulation Authority, Barristers, Bar Council of England and Wales, Bar Standards Board, Contra Mundum, R v Sussex Justices, Police Impartiality and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

[post_title] was last updated on the 23rd June 2026

By Dom Watts

Dom Watts founded the Ministry of Injustice in July 2021. Dom is an IT Professional with 30+ years experience in Tier 1 Banking, Government, Defence, Healthcare and Global Blue Chips. Dom has no legal training and is not a lawyer but has previously consulted for a Magic Circle Law Firm. You can find Dom on X or Google.

Dom Watts publishes the Ministry of Injustice as a citizen journalist. The journalism exemption is detailed in the Data protection and journalism code of practice published by the ICO and Section 124 of the Data Protection Act 2018.

Section 2 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of truth. Section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of honest opinion. Section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the defence of public interest. Section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013 sets out the single publication rule.

Section 4a of The Limitation Act 1980 defines the time limit for actions for defamation or malicious falsehood as one year from the date on which the cause of action accrued.

Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 gives the right to freedom of expression. "This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers."

"Free speech encompasses the right to offend, and indeed to abuse another." - Para 43 Scottow v CPS [2020] EWHC 3421 (Admin)

"Free speech is a fundamental common law right" - Para 21 R v Shayler [2002] UKHL 11 [2003] 1 AC 247 per Lord Bingham and Para 42 Phillips -v- Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs [2024] EWHC 32 (Admin)

Dom is a member of The Free Speech Union

“A key issue here is the need to distinguish between conduct which, however objectionable, does not justify invoking the criminal law and conduct which crosses the line and results in criminal liability" - Para 31 R v O’Neill [2016] EWCA Crim 92 [2016]

“Harassment is generally understood to involve improper oppressive and unreasonable conduct that is targeted at an individual and calculated to produce alarm and distress” - Para 38 R v O’Neill [2016] EWCA Crim 92 [2016]

"The behaviour said to amount to harassment must reach a level of seriousness passing beyond irritations, annoyances....The gravity of the misconduct must be of an order which would sustain criminal liability" - Paras [40-44] Hayden v Dickenson [2020] EWHC 3291 (QB)

"If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything"

In 2002 Dom Watts was an unlikely consumer champion. The dad of three from Croydon took on the power and might of Kodak – and won...Dom on BBC Working Lunch

Rule of Law - Open Justice - Policing By Consent