Adverse inference is a legal principle that plays a significant role in various areas of law, including criminal, civil, and family law. It arises when a party remains silent or withholds evidence, leading the court to draw a negative inference.
The CPS publish important guidance on the law and practice surrounding adverse inferences from a Defendant’s silence in certain circumstances. To avoid the drawing of an adverse inference, some Defendants will read out a pre-prepared statement and then refuse to answer any further questions.
Section 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act (CJPOA) 1994
Section 34 of theCriminal Justice and Public Order Act (CJPOA) 1994 allows an inference to be drawn if a suspect remains silent when questioned under caution before being charged and subsequently relies on a relevant fact in court.
If a suspect declines to answer questions during questioning, this alone does not trigger an adverse inference. However, when the suspect later seeks to provide an account or explanation, the adverse inference provision comes into play.
The term “fact” in Section 34 has a broad meaning, covering any alleged fact that is in issue and put forward as part of the defence case. Even if the defendant does not give or call evidence, a specific case presented by the defence advocate to a prosecution witness can be considered a relevant fact.
Sections 35 to 37 of the CJPOA 1994
Section 35: Deals with the effect of a defendant’s silence at trial. It allows the court to draw an adverse inference if the defendant remains silent during the trial.
Section 36: Addresses the effect of a defendant’s refusal or failure to account for objects, substances, or marks.
Section 37: Covers the effect of a defendant’s refusal or failure to account for their presence at a particular place.
Section 38 of the CJPOA 1994 – Interpretation and Savings
Definitions:
Legal Representative: Refers to a person authorized under the Legal Services Act 2007 for activities related to the exercise of a right of audience or the conduct of litigation.
Place: Encompasses buildings, vehicles, vessels, aircraft, and any other location.
Offences Charged:
References to an “offence charged” include any other offense for which the accused could lawfully be convicted based on the same charge.
Inferences and Proceedings:
Proceedings Against the Accused: An adverse inference cannot solely lead to transferring proceedings to the Crown Court, finding a case to answer, or convicting the accused.
Refusal to Grant Applications: A judge cannot refuse applications solely based on an inference drawn from the accused’s failure to answer questions (as mentioned in sections 34, 36, or 37).
Preserving Other Legal Provisions:
Admissibility of Evidence: Sections 34, 35, 36, or 37 do not affect provisions that render certain answers or evidence inadmissible against the accused or others.
Court’s Discretion: Courts retain the power to exclude evidence at their discretion, regardless of whether it involves furnishing information, making discoveries, producing documents, or other forms of evidence.
Section 38 ensures that adverse inferences are drawn judiciously, respecting legal rights and maintaining fairness in criminal proceedings.
Preconditions for Drawing an Adverse Inference
Before an adverse inference can be drawn, the following conditions must be met:
Certainly! Let’s explore the six necessary conditions that must be satisfied before an adverse inference can be drawn in circumstances where there has been a failure to mention a relevant fact when questioned. These conditions are crucial in legal proceedings, particularly when considering a defendant’s silence. Here they are:
Pre-interview Disclosure:
The defendant must have been informed of the allegations against them before any questioning.
This ensures that the defendant is aware of the specific charges they are facing.
Legal Advice to Be Silent:
The defendant must have received legal advice regarding their right to remain silent.
Legal professionals must ensure that the defendant understands their options and the potential consequences of remaining silent.
The Defendant Waiving Legal Privilege:
If the defendant voluntarily waives their legal privilege (i.e., chooses to speak), their silence during questioning can be used against them.
This condition ensures that the defendant’s silence is a deliberate choice rather than a lack of understanding.
Prepared and Self-Serving Statements:
The court considers whether the defendant’s statements were prepared or self-serving.
If the defendant selectively chooses to mention certain facts while remaining silent about others, this can impact the inference drawn.
Failure to Mention a Relevant Fact:
The alleged failure must relate to not mentioning a fact that is relevant to the case.
The defendant’s silence regarding a crucial detail can be significant in assessing their credibility.
Reasonable Expectation to Mention When Questioned:
The defendant’s silence should pertain to a fact that, under the circumstances, they could reasonably have been expected to mention when questioned.
If the omission is material and relevant, an adverse inference may be drawn.
These conditions help ensure fairness and balance in legal proceedings, allowing courts to consider a defendant’s silence in a well-defined context.
Case Law Examples
In Webber [2004] 1 All ER 770, the House of Lords held that the word “fact” as given in Section 34 should be given a broad meaning. It covered any alleged fact which was in issue and put forward as part of the defence case. Therefore, a specific case put by a Defendants advocate to a prosecution witness can be a fact relied on, even if the Defendant does not give or call evidence.
In M [2012] 1 Cr App R 26, it was held that the judge had incorrectly allowed the jury to draw an adverse inference from a failure by the appellant to mention relevant facts in interview when there was no basis for drawing one. There, the officers who interviewed the appellant mistakenly asked him about the alleged rape on the wrong date. The appellant subsequently relied on facts relevant to the date that the alleged rape was said to have occurred. The Court found that it was difficult to see how in those circumstances the appellant could have reasonably been expected to say more.
In Lee [2015] EWCA Crim 420, it was held that the judge had correctly allowed the jury to draw adverse inferences from the Defendants silence in interview following his arrest for an assault on his partner. Although the police did not have the specific details of the allegations at that stage, the questions were clearly directed to trying to discover whether or by whom the partner had been assaulted.
Civil Law
Evidence Withheld: In civil proceedings, parties may withhold evidence within their possession or control.
Negative Inference: If a party fails to produce relevant evidence, the court may infer that the evidence would have been unfavourable to that party’s position.
Example: If a claimant fails to provide crucial documents related to their claim, the court may infer that those documents would not support their case.
Family Law
Child Custody Cases: In family law, adverse inference can arise in child custody disputes.
Parental Behaviour: If a parent refuses to provide relevant information about their parenting abilities or fails to disclose relevant facts, the court may infer negatively.
Example: If a parent avoids discussing their history of substance abuse during custody proceedings, the court may draw an adverse inference.
Adverse inference ensures that parties are transparent and forthcoming in legal proceedings. Whether in criminal, civil, or family law, the principle encourages honesty and accountability. Legal professionals must navigate these provisions carefully to uphold justice and fairness.
A Lucas Direction, stemming from the case of R v Lucas (Ruth) [1981] EWCA Crim J0519-8, is a legal principle used in criminal trials to guide the jury on how to consider the evidence of lies told by a defendant. The case of Regina v Lucas (Ruth) is a landmark decision that established the criteria under which a lie can be considered as evidence of guilt.
The case involved Iyabode Ruth Lucas, who was convicted at Reading Crown Court on two counts of being knowingly concerned in the fraudulent evasion of the prohibition of the importation into the UK of a controlled drug, namely cannabis, contrary to the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. The conviction was based on her arrival from Nigeria at Gatwick and Heathrow airports with significant quantities of cannabis. The appeal focused on whether the trial judge gave a correct direction on the question of corroboration of the evidence provided by an accomplice.
The Court of Appeal, led by Lord Lane LCJ, held that the mere fact that a defendant has lied is not in itself evidence of guilt. People may lie for various reasons, such as shame, panic, or the desire to cover for someone else. Therefore, a Lucas Direction instructs the jury that they can only consider a lie as evidence supporting guilt if certain conditions are met:
The lie must be deliberate. The lie must relate to a material issue. The lie must be told after the crime. The lie must be told before there is a strong suspicion of guilt. The jury must be satisfied that the lie was told to conceal guilt, and even then, it is not conclusive proof of guilt but merely an additional piece of evidence to be weighed with all other evidence in the case.
Lucas Direction Conditions
The Lucas Direction is significant because it protects defendants from being unjustly convicted based solely on their lies. It ensures that the jury understands that not all lies are indicative of guilt and that they must carefully consider the context and reasons for the lie before drawing any inferences.
The principles from Regina v Lucas (Ruth) have been cited in numerous subsequent cases and have become an integral part of jury instructions in criminal trials. It reflects the careful balance that must be struck in the justice system between the prosecution’s need to prove guilt and the protection of the rights of the accused.
In summary, the Lucas Direction serves as a safeguard against wrongful convictions and underscores the importance of a fair trial. It is a reminder that while the truth is paramount in the pursuit of justice, the reasons behind a person’s actions, including their lies, must be thoroughly examined and understood. The legacy of Regina v Lucas (Ruth) continues to influence the administration of justice, ensuring that juries are properly directed on how to approach evidence of lies in the context of a criminal trial.
The Inns of Court are professional associations for barristers in England and Wales. They are responsible for the training and qualification of barristers, who are the specialised courtroom advocates in the British legal system. Every barrister must belong to one of these Inns.
London’s Four Inns of Court are renowned for their rich history, prestigious legal education and significant role in shaping the British legal system.
During the 12th and early 13th centuries, law was primarily taught by the clergy in the City of London. However, a papal bull in 1218 prohibited the clergy from practicing in secular courts. Laymen gradually took over legal practice and teaching. Guilds of law, modelled on trade guilds, eventually evolved into the Inns of Court.
The Four Inns of Court
Lincoln’s Inn
History: Established in the 14th century, The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn is one of the oldest Inns of Court. It takes its name from the area of London where it is located. The Inn’s origins can be traced back to the legal lectures and apprenticeships that took place here in the medieval period. Over time, Lincoln’s Inn became a hub for legal education and practice, attracting aspiring lawyers from across England.
Notable Features: Lincoln’s Inn boasts impressive architectural heritage, with its stunning Great Hall dating back to the 15th century. The Chapel, Library, and Gardens further enhance its historic appeal.
Key Figures: Many distinguished legal minds have been associated with Lincoln’s Inn, including Thomas More, Lord Mansfield, and Lord Denning.
History: The Honourable Society of Gray’s Inn, situated near Holborn, has origins dating back to at least the 14th century. Like other Inns, Gray’s Inn served as a place of legal study and networking for aspiring lawyers. Its members played significant roles in the legal and political spheres throughout history.
Notable Features: The Gray’s Inn Hall, built in 1560, is a highlight of this institution. The Walks, a serene garden area, provide a tranquil retreat in the heart of bustling London.
Key Figures: Francis Bacon, one of England’s most famous philosophers and statesmen, was associated with Gray’s Inn.
Inner Temple
History: The Honourable Society of Inner Temple, located in the Temple area of London, traces its roots to the Knights Templar, who originally owned the land. By the 14th century, it had become a significant legal centre. The Inns of Court played essential roles in legal education and fostering professional standards.
Notable Features: The Inner Temple Hall, completed in 1572, is an architectural gem with historical significance. The tranquil Inner Temple Gardens offer a serene escape amidst London’s bustling streets.
Key Figures: Sir Edward Coke, a renowned jurist and parliamentarian, was associated with Inner Temple.
Middle Temple
History: The Honourable Society of Middle Temple, adjacent to Inner Temple, also has medieval origins and was associated with the Knights Templar. It became a distinct legal institution by the late 14th century. Middle Temple has played a crucial role in legal education and professional development.
Notable Features: Middle Temple Hall, completed in 1573, is renowned for its grandeur and historic significance. The buildings and gardens of Middle Temple offer a captivating glimpse into London’s legal and architectural heritage.
Key Figures: Notable members include Sir Walter Raleigh and Lord Eldon.
In the late 20th century, many barristers’ chambers moved outside the Inns’ precincts due to growth in the legal profession and a desire for more modern accommodations. However, the Inns of Court continue to play a vital role in legal education and professional development.
In summary, the Inns of Court are not merely historical relics; they remain essential institutions for barristers, shaping legal practice and tradition to this day.
A Notary is a qualified lawyer and a member of the oldest branch of the legal profession in the United Kingdom. In this article we explore the role, qualifications and historical context of notaries.
Role of a Notary
Authentication and Certification:
Notaries specialise in authenticating and certifying signatures, authority, and capacity related to documents for use abroad.
They ensure the validity and reliability of legal documents in international transactions.
General Legal Practice:
Notaries are authorised to conduct general legal practice, excluding court proceedings.
Their work spans various areas, including conveyancing (property transactions) and probate (handling wills and estates).
Commissioner for Oaths:
Notaries can exercise the powers of a Commissioner for Oaths.
They administer oaths and affirmations for legal purposes.
The Guide to Judicial Conduct – Revised July 2023, published by the judiciary, is intended to assist judges, tribunal members, coroners and magistrates, in relation to their conduct.
The Guide to Judicial Conduct, amongst other things, states that judicial office holders are expected to display diligence and care in the discharge of judicial duties.
The Guidance is based on the principle that responsibility for deciding whether or not a particular activity or course of conduct is appropriate rests with each individual judicial office holder.
The Guide is therefore not a code, nor does it contain rules other than where clearly stated. It contains a set of core principles which will help judicial office holders reach their own decisions.
Every court should have a Code of Judicial Conduct that sets out the standards of ethical conduct to be expected of the Court. Such a Code serves a number of purposes. It provides guidance to the members of the Court. It informs those who use the Court of the standards that they can reasonably expect of its judges. It explains to members of the public how judges behave and should help to secure their respect and support for the judiciary.
The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) is responsible for investigating complaints about the personal conduct of judges, as well as their professional conduct. It has the power to investigate complaints made by members of the public, legal professionals, and other judges.
The JCIO’s investigations are carried out by a team of investigators who are independent of the judiciary.
You can check if a a judge has had any disciplinary action against them as Disciplinary statements are published on the JCIO website and are sorted by year.
The JCIO publication policy states that a statement will normally be published when a disciplinary sanction has been issued to a judicial office-holder for misconduct.
The Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor may decide jointly to:
issue a statement in any case;
decline to issue a statement in any case;
delete a statement prior to the expiration of the relevant publication period.
Misconduct by Senior Judiciary
These people are expected to be addressed as “Your Honour”! In a real business they would have been fired ! Can you Criticise a Judge ?
“The Lady Chief Justice, with the Lord Chancellor’s agreement, has issued Recorder Simon Myerson with formal advice for misconduct after he posted inappropriately on Twitter (now known as X).”
“The Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor agreed with the nominated judge that HHJ Gerald’s actions fell short of the standards expected of a judge and that his actions amounted to judicial misconduct.”
The President of the King’s Bench Division (KBD) is responsible for the deployment and organisation of the work of the largest of the three High Court Divisions. At its full complement the King’s Bench Division has 71 High Court Judges and has the most varied jurisdiction. By the nature of the office the President is a judge of the Court of Appeal.
Dame Victoria succeeded Sir Brian Leveson and is the first woman to hold the position of President of the Queen’s Bench Division and subsequently is the first woman to hold the position of President of the King’s Bench Division.
History of the King’s Bench Division
The King’s Bench Division has a long and intricate history, tracing back to the time of William the Conqueror.
As established by the Magna Carta, the Royal Court (known as coram rege) had jurisdiction over cases heard before the king. These cases could be held anywhere the king was located, whether around the country or at Westminster. Over time, the King’s Bench became a central institution for legal proceedings, handling various matters.
The selection panel comprises the Lady Chief Justice as Chair, a nominee of the Lady Chief Justice, the Chair of the JAC, a lay member of the JAC and a nominee of the JAC Chair agreed with the Lady Chief Justice.
The panel reports to the Lord Chancellor, who can then accept the selection, reject it, or require the panel to reconsider. If practical the panel must consult the current holder of the office for which a selection is being made.
A solicitor is a qualified legal professional who plays a crucial role in the legal system of England and Wales. Let’s explore what solicitors do, their qualifications and the essential skills.
Role of a Solicitor
Legal Advice and Representation:
Solicitors provide specialist legal advice across various areas of law.
They represent and defend clients’ legal interests.
Clients can be individuals, groups, public sector organizations, or private companies.
Client Liaison:
As a solicitor, you work closely with clients and are often their first point of contact.
You take instructions from clients and advise them on necessary legal actions.
Diverse Areas of Practice:
Solicitors handle a wide range of issues:
Personal matters: Wills, divorces, and family law.
Commercial work: Mergers, acquisitions, and business transactions.
Work Settings:
Once qualified, solicitors can work in various settings:
Private practice: Running their own law firms.
In-house: Advising commercial or industrial organizations.
Government: Local or central government roles.
Court service: Participating in legal proceedings.
Qualifications for Becoming a Solicitor
Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE):
Introduced in September 2021, the SQE is the new centralized assessment for solicitor qualification.
It replaces the traditional Legal Practice Course (LPC) route.
The SQE consists of four stages:
Degree: Obtain a degree (or equivalent) in any subject.
SQE1 and SQE2 assessments: Pass these assessments.
Qualifying Work Experience (QWE): Complete a minimum of two years of relevant work experience.
Character and suitability: Demonstrate satisfactory character.
Non-Law Graduates:
Non-law graduates acquire foundational legal knowledge through conversion courses:
Postgraduate Diploma in Law (PGDL).
Master of Arts in Law (MA Law Conversion).
Master of Arts in Law (MA Law SQE1).
SQE Law Essentials Online.
Essential Skills for Solicitors
Professionalism:
Approach work with integrity and respect for confidentiality.
Problem-Solving:
Analyse complex legal issues and find practical solutions.
Research and Analysis:
Conduct thorough legal research to support cases.
Communication:
Excellent written and oral communication skills are vital.
In summary, solicitors are legal professionals who combine legal expertise with client-focused service, ensuring justice and legal protection for individuals and organizations alike
The King’s Counsel (KC) is a prestigious title awarded to senior barristers and advocates who have rights of audience in the higher courts of England and Wales who have also demonstrated the competencies in the Competency Framework to a standard of excellence.
King’s Counsel are appointed from amongst practising advocates – both barristers and solicitors.
The selection process for KC’s is rigorous and selective, and candidates must meet specific criteria to be eligible for consideration.
In this article, we will examine the history, qualifications, and benefits of being appointed as a King’s Counsel in the UK, as well as the process of recommendation and appointment.
History of King’s Counsel
The title of King’s Counsel (KC) has a long and rich history in the legal profession in the UK. It was first introduced in the 16th century during the reign of King Elizabeth I. At that time, the title was conferred upon lawyers who were appointed by the monarch to act as legal advisors and advocates in court.
In the 19th century, the title of King’s Counsel became more closely associated with the legal profession. It was recognized as a mark of excellence in the field, and those who were appointed to the position were seen as being among the most skilled and experienced lawyers in the country.
Qualifications for King’s Counsel
To be considered for appointment as a King’s Counsel, a lawyer must meet a strict set of criteria.
First and foremost, they must have a minimum of ten years’ experience practicing law, and they must have demonstrated exceptional skill and expertise in their field.
They must also have a strong record of advocacy and be able to demonstrate that they have achieved outstanding results for their clients.
In addition to these qualifications, a lawyer must also be nominated for the position by the Lord Chancellor.
The Lord Chancellor invites nominations from a range of sources, including judges, other senior lawyers, and professional bodies such as the Bar Council and Law Society.
Once a nomination has been made, the candidate must submit an application that includes detailed information about their legal career and achievements.
This will typically include information on their education, professional experience, notable cases, and any other relevant information that demonstrates their skill and expertise in the field of law.
Benefits of being a King’s Counsel
Being appointed as a King’s Counsel is a significant achievement in the legal profession. It is a mark of excellence that is recognized both within the legal profession and outside of it. It is also a title that comes with a number of benefits.
One of the main benefits of being a King’s Counsel is that it provides lawyers with increased opportunities to work on high-profile and complex cases. As one of the most respected titles in the legal profession, those who hold the position of King’s Counsel are often sought out by clients who are looking for the best possible representation.
Another benefit of being a King’s Counsel is that it can lead to increased earnings. Lawyers who hold this title are often able to command higher fees for their services, as clients are willing to pay a premium for the expertise and experience that comes with the position.
In addition to these benefits, being a King’s Counsel is also an opportunity to give back to the legal profession. Those who hold this title are often involved in mentoring and training younger lawyers, helping to ensure that the next generation of legal professionals is well-prepared to take on the challenges of the profession.
Recommendation and Appointment Process
The process of appointing a KC in the UK is overseen by the King’s Counsel Appointments (KCA) committee. The KCA is an independent body that is responsible for recommending candidates for appointment as KCs to the Lord Chancellor.
The process typically begins with nominations made by judges, other senior lawyers, and professional bodies such as the Bar Council and Law Society. The Lord Chancellor may also invite nominations from other sources, including members of the public.
Once a nomination has been made, the candidate must submit an application that includes detailed information about their legal career and achievements. The KCA committee will then review the application and consider a range of factors when making their recommendation, including the candidate’s skill, experience, and professional conduct.
The KCA also considers diversity and inclusion when making their recommendations. They are committed to ensuring that the legal profession is representative of the communities it serves, and they actively seek out candidates from a diverse range of backgrounds.
Once the KCA has made their recommendation, it is then up to the Lord Chancellor to make the final decision on whether to appoint the candidate as a KC. The Lord Chancellor typically follows the recommendation of the KCA, but they are not bound to do so.
Being appointed as a King’s Counsel is a significant achievement in the legal profession in the UK. It is a title that is recognized both within the legal profession and outside of it, and it comes with a range of benefits.
Overall, the appointment of KCs is a rigorous and selective process that ensures that only the most skilled and experienced lawyers in the UK are awarded this prestigious title.
It is a mark of excellence that is highly respected within the legal profession and serves as a testament to a lawyer’s skill and expertise in the practice of law.
Read the reviews of Junior Sussex BarristerGavin HoweandLegal 500Junior BarristerEleanor Battie. Neither who, in my opinion, are ever likely to receive KC….
“He is awful, underhanded and should not be practising law!”
2,878 online reports and calls were received between November 2022 and February 2024 in relation to officers and staff at the Metropolitan Police Service. It has resulted in 728 Met Police led investigations.
‘Its success has been a very positive step for our communities in London and we are pleased that all the other forces have decided to adopt it and we will see a national roll out……..It’s vital that the public know there are clear systems in place where appalling behaviours will be challenged and addressed robustly and that those within policing know they can trust their colleagues.’
The Police Anti-Corruption and Abuse Reporting Service gives people an easy way to report information about a police officer, member of police staff or volunteer who they believe are taking advantage of their role and abusing their position of power. This abuse may be for financial or sexual motivation, or their conduct could be motivated by hatred or prejudice.
You can contact the national Police Anti-Corruption and Abuse Reporting Service on 0800 085 0000 or online24/7, 365 days a year to provide any information you may have about a Police Service, police officer, member of police staff or police volunteer who engage in the following :-
Provides information or influence in return for money or favours.
Uses their policing position for personal advantage – whether financial or otherwise.
Crosses professional boundaries for sexual purposes.
Abuses or controls their partner, or those they have a relationship with.
Engages in racist, homophobic or misogynistic conduct, on or off duty, in person or online.
Call 999 if:
a serious offence is in progress or has just been committed
someone is in immediate danger or harm
property is in danger of being damaged
a serious disruption to the public is likely
Call 101 for non-emergency enquiries. You can also Report a Crime online.
‘We do not underestimate the impact recent events have had on trust and confidence in policing, including the appalling findings of the Angiolini report……The vast majority of police officers and staff act professionally and with integrity in the fulfilment of their duties to protect the public’
Sussex Police serves East and West Sussex and the city of Brighton & Hove which is an area of about 3,780km. A resident population of 1.65m people grows significantly with millions of visitors, holidaymakers, students, seasonal workers and the 46 million passengers who travel annually through Gatwick Airport.
Sussex Police are investigating (Operation Bramber) allegations of medical negligence at the University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, relating to neurosurgery and general surgery at the Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton in the period between 2015 and 2021.
Sussex PC dismissed for failing to store knife and ammo Oliver Kirkup has been dismissed by Sussex Police after failing to properly store ammunition and a knife seized at Gatwick Airport. “The actions of this officer on these occasions were not in line with the values and standards that we expect, lacking honesty and integrity.”
Sussex Police officer dismissed Sussex Police officer ‘A’ was dismissed without notice after a hearing found he behaved inappropriately towards female colleagues and acted dishonestly by claiming overtime.
Sussex Police misconduct hearing Recruit Learner DC Connor Farrell of Sussex Police will answer allegations allegedly in breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour of: Honesty & Integrity, Discreditable Conduct, Confidentiality and Duties & Instructions.
Sussex Police officer banned for dishonesty Former Sussex Police PC Jacob Vaughan was alleged to have damaged a police car he was driving while on police premises, but failed to report it. “The public deserve to trust that their police officers are behaving honestly, and we will continue to root out those who do not meet that expectation.” – Detective Superintendent Andy Wolstenholme
Sussex Police apology to vulnerable victim Sussex Police has apologised to the victim of police investigator David Gamlin who engaged in sexual activity with her while he was on duty. “Gamlin has been barred from ever serving with the police again.”
Sussex Police officer ‘said no 62 times’ during alleged sex assault PC Daniel Julian of Sussex Police was cleared of three counts of sexual assault, causing a woman to engage in sexual activity without consent and attempted rape by a jury at Lewes Crown Court in April 2024. Misconduct proceedings at Sussex Police Headquarters continue..
Sussex Police recruit barred Former PC Cameron Young did not reveal that he had previously been subject to a disciplinary investigation when applying to join Sussex Police.
Sussex Police officer found not guilty PC Sam James Wilson of Sussex Police has been found not guilty of engaging in controlling and coercive behaviour towards his former partner following a trial at Kingston Crown Court. Sussex Police will now consider misconduct proceedings as the criminal case has concluded.
Sussex Police accelerated misconduct hearing It is alleged that PC Cameron Young EC118 from the East Sussex Police Divisional Coaching Unit has breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour for Honesty and Integrity. He failed to disclose a previous disciplinary investigation on his vetting form when he applied to join Sussex Police.
Sussex Police sergeant is demoted after touching colleague Sussex Police sergeant Matthew Crane who tapped out a tune on a female colleague’s bottom before asking her for naked pictures has kept his job. Sgt Crane’s actions had the potential to undermine discipline and good order within the police an undermine public confidence.
Sussex Police panel says it has ‘lost confidence’ in PCC Members of the Sussex Police and Crime Panel has said it has “lost confidence” in Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner Katy Bourne over her attendance at a protest march over an asylum seeker camp in Crowborough.
Sussex Police officer PC Peter De Silvo has been charged with stalking and fraud offences and is due to appear before Staines Magistrates’ Court on Friday 19th December 2025
‘Thank you for the clarity and for outlining the circumstances which I am frankly mortified about and offer my sincere apologies. I am also very disappointed in those who have let you down and I have asked for that/them to be addressed.’
Former Sussex Police officer barred for life A Sussex Police statement, following the hearing, read: “A former police officer convicted of distributing indecent images of children has been found to have committed gross misconduct.”
Sussex Police needs to improve staff vetting His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) report stated there was a “huge backlog of vetting” and that some employees were working in a job “without the proper level of clearance”.
This week (April 25-29) is National Stalking Awareness Week. I have reported a stalker on several occasions to Sussex Police but they have refuse to record this as a crime. Do Sussex Police @sussex_police take stalking seriously in Sussex ?https://t.co/C9B7z3s0Sq
Ex Sussex Police PC jailed over driving offences fraud Seren Sriganesh a former Sussex police officer has been jailed after falsely claiming his parents had committed his three driving offences. He also unlawfully accessed police systems to view details of one of the offences.
‘Unhinged’ Sussex PC crashed into e-bike It is alleged Sussex Police PC Tim Bradshaw drove his police car at an e-bike causing serious injury by dangerous driving. “There’s a difference between protecting and serving our community and being unhinged”
Sussex armed police swoop on boys playing with toy Nerf guns Sussex Armed Police yelled at Two boys aged 12 and 13 to get on the ground and put down their ‘weapons’. Sussex Police only realised the nerf guns were toys when they shot the foam bullets for themselves.
Sussex Police officers, staff and volunteers work together to deliver the strategic priorities set within the Sussex Police and Crime Plan and the Sussex Police priorities which are as follows :-
A Sussex Police Community Support Officer (PCSO) was shown refusing to respond to an alleged assault in a supermarket, in a video posted on TikTok.
The video shows a man telling the officer about a fight in the Co-op store in Lancing which had been reported to the police.
The PCSO said: “I’m not a response unit.”
Sussex Police said it had launched an investigation.
The man who was filmed in conversation with the PCSO said members of the public were trying to stop a shoplifter.
He said to the PCSO: “You need to get round to the Co-op. There’s just been a fight round there, because people are trying to stop the shoplifter that you’re doing nothing about.”
He said: “People have called the police and you’re sitting here.”
The officer responded: “I’m not a response unit unfortunately.”
The man said the sight of the police car would “make them scatter”.
The officer replied: “Yeah, but then I have to deal with it.”
“That’s why I’m here and not round there.”
In a statement, Sussex Police said: “We are aware of video footage of a single-crewed Police Community Support Officer being approached by a member of the public to report an incident in Lancing.
“The matter was reported to us and a police officer attended the incident as an emergency. The PCSO also then attended the scene.”
Supt Nick Dias said: “We are sorry for the clumsy language used by the PCSO in this exchange and acknowledge the public’s concern. A police unit was dispatched to the scene as a matter of priority. Our response to this incident is being reviewed.”
Katy Bourne, Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner, said she shared “the public’s disappointment and understandable concern” with the video.
“A member of the public sent me the video and I immediately shared it with the Chief Constable who referred the incident to the Sussex professional standards department.”
She added: “This is not the sort of response that I would expect and the public deserve.”
The report PEEL 2021/22 – An inspection of Sussex Police graded Sussex Police’s performance across nine areas of policing and found the force was ‘good’ in two areas, ‘adequate’ in four areas, ‘requires improvement’ in one area, and ‘inadequate’ in two areas.
Sussex Police urgently needs to improve how it responds to the public, and how it records crime.
Its recording of reports of violent crime is inadequate, and the force is also missing opportunities to safeguard vulnerable people. It needs to improve the way it assesses initial calls to the force so that vulnerable people and repeat callers are routinely identified.
As a result of my concerns I have already been in contact with the chief constable and the police and crime commissioner.
I am pleased with the way the force has responded so far and I will continue to check the force’s progress in addressing areas for improvement in the coming months.
His Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary – Roy Wilsher
Sussex Police and Surrey Police failed to use people’s personal data lawfully by recording hundreds of thousands of phone calls without their knowledge. People have the right to expect that when they speak to a police officer, the information they disclose is handled responsibly. We can only estimate the huge amount of personal data collected during these conversations, including highly sensitive information relating to suspected crimes.
The reprimand reflects the use of the ICO’s wider powers towards the public sector as large fines could lead to reduced budgets for the provision of vital services. This case highlights why the ICO is pursuing a different approach, as fining Surrey Police and Sussex Police risks impacting the victims of crime in the area once again.
This case should be a lesson learned to any organisation planning to introduce an app, product or service that uses people’s personal data. Organisations must consider people’s data protection rights and implement data protection principles from the very start.
Sussex Police do not tolerate any hateful comments towards their gender identity regardless of crimes committed. This is irrelevant to the crime that has been committed and investigated.
Sussex Police Twitter 27th September 2022
Please see our statement below in relation to the recent sentencing of a historic sex offender. pic.twitter.com/7ZcwkT7yEt
.@Sussex_police have done well to put a dangerous criminal behind bars. But they’ve got it wrong by playing identity politics and denying biology. Focus on catching criminals not policing pronouns. #commonsensepolicinghttps://t.co/19U1Qf77F7
Home Secretary’s Comment About Sussex PoliceSussex Police Twitter Account
Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner Priorities
“As your PCC, my job is to hold the Chief Constable of Sussex Police to account and ensure that the police focus on local priorities. I believe every citizen has a right to feel safe on the streets and in their homes.
“In consultation with the Chief Constable and the people of Sussex, I have published a Police & Crime Plan setting out the priorities and local objectives that local people and business say are important to them.
With your support, I am determined that Sussex Police will operate effectively and efficiently and that the values I have embraced during my professional career – hard work, integrity and fairness – underpin everything we do together.”
Police typically are responsible for maintaining public order and safety, enforcing the law, and preventing, detecting, and investigating criminal activities.
Sussex Police should concentrate on doing the job that they are paid to do.No wonder the public have no faith in the Police !
Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation, or SLAPPs, are legal actions… Read more: Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPPs)
Judge Tony Alan Walter Baumgartner, known as His Honour Judge… Read more: His Honour Judge Tony Baumgartner – Recorder of Westminster
On the 8th July 2026, the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary… Read more: New Protocol for Legal Professionals to Raise Informal Concerns About Judges Behaviour
In April 2026, His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire… Read more: The Policing Performance System
The Judicial College serves as the central pillar of professional… Read more: What is the Judicial College ?
An independent review by the Police Leadership Commission has concluded… Read more: Police Leadership Commission Report
Repealing a law in the United Kingdom does not mean… Read more: Repeal a Law
The provision of judges’ lodgings is a longstanding feature of… Read more: What are Judges Lodgings ?
The BBC describes so-called “two-tier policing” as where right-wing protests… Read more: What is Two Tier Policing ?
Handcuffs are a standard restraint tool used by police officers… Read more: Lawful Use of Handcuffs by the Police
Judge Nicholas Edward Rowland, known as His Honour Judge Nicholas… Read more: His Honour Judge Nicholas Rowland
The police barred and advisory lists, which are managed by… Read more: Police Barred and Advisory Lists
