Categories
Family Law Law

McKenzie Friend

mckenzie friend

The term McKenzie Friend stems from the landmark case of McKenzie v McKenzie in 1970 (McKenzie v McKenzie [1970] 3 WLR 472 CA), where a husband sought assistance from a non-legally qualified friend to represent him in court during divorce proceedings.

Can a McKenzie Friend Help You in Court? Everything* You Need to Know! – Alan Robertshaw Barrister

The Court of Appeal, in their judgment made in 1970, recognised that litigants, especially those without legal representation, could benefit from such support. Consequently, the role of McKenzie Friends was officially acknowledged, allowing individuals to accompany and assist Litigants in Person (LIP) in court.

In 2005 the Court of Appeal, in the matter of the children of Mr O’Connell, Mr Whelan and Mr Watson, further clarified the role of McKenzie friends.

Article 6 of the ECHR is engaged in any application by a litigant in person for the assistance of a McKenzie friend. Furthermore, in our judgment, two clear propositions stand out from the authorities as they apply to family proceedings.

These are:

(1) that the presumption in favour of the litigant being allowed the assistance of a McKenzie friend is a strong one; and

(2) that such a request should not be refused without good reason, even where the proceedings relate to a child and are being heard in private.

[2005] EWCA Civ 759 – LORD JUSTICE THORPE and LORD JUSTICE WALL

Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 makes it unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with a person’s rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.

Role and Responsibilities of McKenzie Friends

McKenzie Friends are volunteers, friends, family members, or sometimes paid advisors, who assist litigants in various ways. They are not lawyers, but their involvement can be valuable.

A McKenzie Friend can help litigants by providing emotional support, taking notes during proceedings, offering practical advice, and helping with case preparation.

However, it is essential to note that McKenzie Friends cannot address the court directly or act as legal representatives.

Practice Guidance: McKenzie Friends (Civil and Family Courts)

In July 2010, the role of McKenzie Friends was formalised through the issuance of Practice Guidance by the then Master of the Rolls and the President of the Family Division.

mckenzie-friends-practice-guidance-july-2010Download

The guidance aims to ensure a consistent and fair approach across the civil and family courts when dealing with McKenzie Friends. This Practice Guidance is essential in establishing the parameters and responsibilities of McKenzie Friends in court proceedings.

Guidance from the President’s Office- McKenzie Friends

A guidance document was published by the then President of the Family Division in 2005.

pfd-guidance-mckenzie-friendsDownload

The Courts and Tribunal Judiciary list both guidance documents on their McKenzie Friend webpage.

Reforming the courts’ approach to McKenzie Friends

A consultation paper entitled Reforming the courts’ approach to McKenzie Friends was published by the Lord Chief Justice in February 2016.

mf-consultation-paper-feb2016-1Download

A Consultation Response Reforming the courts’ approach to McKenzie Friends was published by the Lord Chief Justice in February 2019

MF-Consultation-LCJ-Response-Final-Feb-2019Download

Notice of McKenzie Friend

Here is a an example Notice of McKenzie friend which should be completed and handed to the usher before the hearing starts. If you are attending a remote hearing, then you should email the court before the start of the hearing.

notice_of_mckenzie_friendDownload

There is no legal requirement to share this form with the other party (Family or Civil Proceedings).

(2) Paragraph (1) applies to any communication in which any representation is made to the court on a matter of substance or procedure but does not apply to communications that are purely routine, uncontentious and administrative.

FAMILY PROCEDURE RULE 5.7 – PART 5: FORMS, START OF PROCEEDINGS AND COMMUNICATION WITH THE COURT

This practice direction supplements Part 5 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010

1. Rule 5.7(1) FPR 2010 makes provision in relation to the requirement to disclose and, if in writing, to copy any communication with the court to the other parties or their representatives. Exceptions to the requirement are specified in rule 5.7(2), (3) and (7) FPR 2010. This practice direction supplements rule 5.7(7) FPR 2010.

FAMILY PRACTICE DIRECTION 5C – COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE COURT

Court Refusal of the Request for Assistance from a McKenzie Friend

The purpose of allowing a litigant in person the assistance of a McKenzie friend is to further the interests of justice by achieving a level playing field and ensuring a fair hearing.

We endorse the proposition that the presumption in favour of allowing a litigant in person the assistance of a McKenzie friend is very strong, and that such a request should only be refused for compelling reasons.

Furthermore, should a judge identify such reasons, (s)he must explain them carefully and fully to both the litigant in person and the would-be McKenzie friend.

[2005] EWCA Civ 759 – LORD JUSTICE THORPE and LORD JUSTICE WALL

Check out our related articles on Rule of Law, Open Justice, Is the Law Black and White ?, What Does Lady Justice Symbolise ?, McKenzie Friends Rights of Audience, Can a Judge Direct a Jury to Find a Defendant Not Guilty ?, Law Society, Law Commission, Solicitors, Solicitors Regulation Authority, Barristers, Bar Council of England and Wales, Bar Standards Board, Contra Mundum, R v Sussex Justices, Police Impartiality and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Legal Analysis

ULEZ Bag Crime ?

Ulez Ultra Low Emission Zone Crime

ULEZ is London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s much-hated and deeply unpopular road charge, which has seen protests, violence and vandalism (criminal damage) throughout Greater London.

The ULEZ scheme was expanded to cover all of Greater London on Tuesday 29th August 2023. Ulez charges (fines) older, more polluting vehicles £12.50 a day and is currently the largest clean air zone in the world.

The Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every day of the year, except Christmas Day (25th December). The zone operates across all London boroughs, and does not include the M25.

At least a quarter of the cameras in London’s newly expanded Ultra Low Emission Zone have been damaged by vandals, new data reveals.

Campaigners this week have stepped up efforts to deface the cameras installed in wake of mayor Sadiq Khan’s controversial extension of the scheme, which is now clobbering thousands more drivers with £12.50 a day charges.

ULEZ vandals damage ‘a quarter of all new cameras in expansion zone’ amid backlash over Sadiq Khan’s ultra-low emissions scheme – Daily Mail 1st September 2023

Is putting a bag over a ULEZ camera criminal damage or harmless civil disobedience ?

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) publish legal guidance on Criminal Damage.

What is Criminal Damage ?

The Criminal Damage Act 1971 (CDA 1971) is the primary source of offences involving damage to property.

Section 1(1) CDA 1971 – A person who without lawful excuse destroys or damages any property belonging to another, intending to destroy or damage any such property, or being reckless as to whether any such property would be destroyed or damaged, shall be guilty of an offence.

This offence is triable either way – para. 29, Schedule 1 Magistrates’ Court Act 1980 (MCA 1980).The maximum penalty is 10 years imprisonment – Section 4 CDA 1971.

What is the Meaning of Property ?

Property” in the Criminal Damage Act 1971 (CDA 1971) means property of a tangible nature, whether real or personal. – Section 10.

The CDA 1971 requires proof that tangible property has been damaged, not necessarily that the damage itself should be tangible. Property does not however include intangibles or things in action.

What is Damage ?

Damage is not defined by the Criminal Damage Act 1971 (CDA 1971).

It should be widely interpreted to include not only permanent or temporary physical harm, but also permanent or temporary impairment of value or usefulness – Morphitis v. Salmon [1990] Crim.L.R. 48.

Any alteration to the physical nature of the property concerned may amount to damage within the meaning of the section.

The courts have construed the term liberally and included damage that is not permanent such as smearing mud on the walls of a police cell.

Where the interference amounts to an impairment of the value or usefulness of the property to the owner, then the necessary damage is established – R v Whiteley [1991] 93 Crim. App. R. 25.

Mens Rea

Mens Rea refers to criminal intent. The literal translation from Latin is “guilty mind.” The plural of mens rea is mentes reae. Mens rea​ is the state of mind statutorily required in order to convict a particular defendant of a particular crime. Establishing the mens rea of an offender, in addition to the actus reus (physical elements of the crime) is usually necessary to prove guilt in a criminal trial.

Cornell Law School

Without Lawful Excuse

Section 5 of the CDA 1971 sets out a defence to criminal damage charges, though not to aggravated criminal damage under s.1(2) – see s.5(1) CDA 1971. A person has a lawful excuse if

  • they believed at the time that those whom they believed to be entitled to consent to the destruction of or damage to the property in question had so consented, or would have so consented to it if they had known of the destruction or damage and its circumstances; or
  • at the time of the act or acts alleged to constitute the offence they believed:
    • that the property, right or interest was in immediate need of protection; and
    • that the means of protection adopted or proposed to be adopted were or would be reasonable having regard to all the circumstances.

Tried Summarily

The provisions of s. 22 and Schedule 2 Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (MCA) deal with the determination of mode of trial for those offences, referred to as “scheduled offences” that are mentioned in the first column of Schedule 2 MCA 1980.

Where a person is charged with an offence contrary to s.1(1) CDA 1971 or with aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring such an offence, or with attempting to commit, or inciting such an offence, and the value involved is less than £5,000, they must be tried summarily.

Tried summarily is an offence that can be tried only in a magistrates’ court.

It is important to note that there are two exceptions set out in Schedule 2 where the offence will be triable either way even if the value of the destroyed property or damage amounts to less than £5000. These are:

  • if the damage was caused by fire (the offence will be arson – see below); and
  • if the damage was done to a memorial on or after 28 June 2022.

Civil Disobedience on Conscientious Grounds

The common law has always been sensitive to the position of protesters when it comes to both prosecution and sentencing.

“My Lords, civil disobedience on conscientious grounds has a long and honourable history in this country.

People who break the law to affirm their belief in the injustice of a law or government action are sometimes vindicated by history.

The suffragettes are an example which comes immediately to mind. It is the mark of a civilised community that it can accommodate protests and demonstrations of this kind.

But there are conventions which are generally accepted by the law-breakers on one side and the law-enforcers on the other.

The protesters behave with a sense of proportion and do not cause excessive damage or inconvenience. And they vouch the sincerity of their beliefs by accepting the penalties imposed by the law.

The police and prosecutors, on the other hand, behave with restraint and the magistrates impose sentences which take the conscientious motives of the protesters into account.

The conditional discharges ordered by the magistrates in the cases which came before them exemplifies their sensitivity to these conventions.”

Lord Hoffmann – R v Jones (Margaret) [2007] 1 AC 161 at [89]:

Is putting a bag over a ULEZ camera criminal damage ?

I am not a lawyer and this is purely my opinion of the Criminal Damage Act 1971. This is not legal advice ! I am not condoning or encouraging any form of criminal behaviour or civil disobedience.

  • Putting a bag over a ULEZ camera would be a temporary impairment of usefulness – Morphitis v. Salmon [1990] Crim.L.R. 48 and would therefore be classed as damage. This would be the Actus Reus (physical elements of the crime)
  • The Mens Rea would be to render the camera unable to carry out it’s function.
  • The damage would be less than £5000 so if prosecuted, it would be tried summarily in a magistrates’ court.
  • Civil disobedience on conscientious grounds has a long and honourable history in this country. The police and prosecutors should behave with restraint and the magistrates impose sentences which take the conscientious motives of the protesters into account.

Check out our articles on Rule of Law, Open Justice, R v Sussex Justices, Policing by Consent and the highly dubious Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Judiciary Legal Professionals

His Honour Judge Michael Slater

Circuit Judge HHJ

His Honour Judge Michael Slater, fell asleep during a trial and was subsequently investigated by the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office who issued a disciplinary statement on the 29th August 2023.

HHJ Michael Slater, a barrister, was appointed to be a circuit judge in November 2016 and deployed to the north eastern circuit, based at Sheffield Combined Court.

STATEMENT FROM THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT
INVESTIGATIONS OFFICE

His Honour Judge Michael Slater

A spokesperson for the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office said:

The Lord Chief Justice, with the Lord Chancellor’s agreement, has issued His Honour Judge Michael Slater with formal advice for misconduct after he was found to have fallen asleep in court during a hearing.

The Guide to Judicial Conduct reminds judges that they are expected to display diligence and care in the discharge of their duties. Judges are expected to ensure that their conduct maintains and enhances public confidence in the judiciary.

Following an investigation carried out under the Judicial Conduct (Judicial and other office holders) Rules 2014, a nominated judge found that HHJ Slater’s behaviour amounted to misconduct and recommended that he should be issued with formal advice.

In making their recommendation, the nominated judge took into account that HHJ Slater had accepted the allegation and apologised, that he was under a great deal of pressure dealing with an unremitting workload, and that his actions had not derailed the trial. They also took into account that HHJ Slater addressed the matter with parties in court and offered them a retrial, though neither party chose to take this up.

Having considered the facts of the case, the Lord Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor agreed with the nominated judge that HHJ Slater’s actions amounted to judicial misconduct and that the appropriate disciplinary sanction is formal advice.

STATEMENT FROM THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT INVESTIGATIONS OFFICE  His Honour Judge Michael Slater
His Honour Judge SlaterNorth East15-11-2016
His Honour Judge Slater Appointment date

According to a Law Gazette article Judge with ‘unremitting workload’ fell asleep during trial published on the 30th August 2023, HHJ Slater fell asleep during a trial. No details were given by the JCIO of what the case was about, when it was heard or for how long the judge fell asleep.

A list of all Circuit Judges is published on the Courts and Tribunal Judiciary website.

“Publicity is the very soul of justice. . . . It keeps the judge himself, while trying, under trial….Where there is no publicity there is no justice”

Jeremy Bentham – Mr Justice Cobb: ‘Justice must be seen to be done’

Check out our articles on Dodgy Judges, His Honour Now His Dishonour, His Honour Judge Martin Davis, HHJ Farquhar, HHJ Bedford, DDJ Nicholes, Do you Have to Bow to a Judge ?, Can you Email a Judge ?, Can you Criticise a Judge ? and the highly dubious Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law

Libel and Slander

libel and slander

Libel and slander are both forms of defamation, which involve making a false statement about someone that damages their reputation.

Libel is a defamatory statement that is written. Slander is a defamatory statement that is oral.

In the United Kingdom, the laws around libel and slander are governed by the Defamation Act 2013 which replaced the previous common law rules on defamation.

Defamation Act 2013

The Defamation Act 2013 defines defamation as a statement that “causes or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant”. It also sets out the criteria for what constitutes a defamatory statement, including whether the statement would lower the claimant in the estimation of right-thinking members of society or whether it would cause the claimant to be shunned or avoided.

Under the Defamation Act 2013, a claimant has to show that the statement was published to a third party and that it referred to them directly or indirectly. The statement must also be shown to be false, unless it is a statement of opinion, in which case the defence of honest opinion may be used.

One of the key changes introduced by the Defamation Act 2013 was the introduction of a new defence of “truth”. If a defendant can prove that the statement is true, they will not be liable for defamation. The Act also introduced a defence of “honest opinion”, which can be used if the statement was a genuine expression of opinion, based on true facts, and was not malicious.

Another important change introduced by the Defamation Act 2013 was the requirement for claimants to show that they had suffered “serious harm” as a result of the defamatory statement. This was intended to prevent trivial claims from clogging up the courts and to ensure that claimants only pursued cases where there was a genuine loss.

Defamation

The role of solicitors and barristers in defamation cases is crucial. A solicitor will typically be the first point of contact for a potential claimant, and will assess the strength of their case and advise on whether it is worth pursuing. They will also be responsible for drafting the claim form and other legal documents, and for liaising with the defendant’s legal team.

The law says that the victim of libel or slander has just 12 months from the date of publication of the libellous or slanderous statement to start Court proceedings. The 12 month time limit can be varied in some circumstances.

Once the claim has been filed, the case will usually be heard in the High Court, although smaller cases may be heard in the County Court. In some cases, the parties may be able to reach a settlement before the case goes to court, but if the case proceeds to trial, a barrister will typically be instructed to represent the claimant.

Barristers are specialist advocates who are trained in the law and court procedure. They will provide advice on the strength of the case, draft legal arguments and represent the claimant in court. Barristers will also cross-examine witnesses and make closing submissions to the judge or jury.

Defendants in defamation cases will also typically be represented by a solicitor and barrister. Their role will be to defend the claim and argue that the statement was not defamatory, or that a defence applies. The defendant may also bring a counter-claim if they believe that the claimant has defamed them.

One important aspect of defamation law in the UK is the ability to apply for an injunction to prevent the publication of defamatory material. This is known as a “gagging order” and can be used to prevent a defendant from publishing further defamatory material, or to prevent the publication of material that has already been produced.

The role of the court in defamation cases is to balance the right to freedom of expression against the right to protect one’s reputation. The court will consider a range of factors, including the seriousness of the defamatory statement, the context in which it was made, the audience it was intended for, and whether the statement was made in the public interest.

Human Rights Act

The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) is an important piece of legislation in the UK that incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into domestic law. The HRA has had a significant impact on defamation law in the UK, particularly in relation to the right to freedom of expression.

Under the HRA, individuals have the right to freedom of expression, which includes the freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas. However, this right is not absolute, and can be subject to restrictions that are necessary in a democratic society.

In defamation cases, the HRA has been used to strike a balance between the right to freedom of expression and the right to protect one’s reputation. The courts have recognised that freedom of expression is a fundamental right, but have also recognised that defamatory statements can have a serious impact on an individual’s reputation and can restrict their right to respect for private life under Article 8 of the ECHR.

In some cases, the HRA has been used to strengthen the defences available to defendants in defamation cases. For example, in the case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [1999], the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) developed a new defence of “responsible journalism” based on the right to freedom of expression under the HRA. The defence applies where a publication is on a matter of public interest, the publisher has taken reasonable steps to verify the information, and the publication is in the public interest.

Similarly, in the case of Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL [2006], the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) held that the right to freedom of expression under the HRA required a high threshold for proving “serious harm” in defamation cases, and that a claimant must show that the publication had caused or was likely to cause “serious harm” to their reputation.

The HRA has also had an impact on the remedies available in defamation cases. Under Article 10 of the ECHR, individuals have the right to seek a remedy for a violation of their right to freedom of expression. This means that claimants in defamation cases can seek a range of remedies, including damages, injunctions, and apologies.

The Human Rights Act has had a significant impact on defamation law in the UK, particularly in relation to the right to freedom of expression.

The Act has been used to strike a balance between the right to freedom of expression and the right to protect one’s reputation, and has led to the development of new defences and a high threshold for proving “serious harm”.

The Act has also had an impact on the remedies available in defamation cases, and has reinforced the importance of the right to seek a remedy for a violation of the right to freedom of expression.

The law around libel and slander in the UK is complex, but is governed by the Defamation Act 2013. The Act introduced important changes, including a requirement for claimants to show “serious harm”, new defences of “truth” and “honest opinion”, and the ability to apply for an injunction to prevent the publication of defamatory material.

It is worth noting that the internet and social media have had a significant impact on defamation law in recent years.

Online platforms have made it easier for defamatory material to be published and shared, and have made it more difficult for individuals to protect their reputation.

However, the same principles of defamation law apply online as they do offline, and individuals can still take legal action to protect their reputation.

In addition, the Defamation Act 2013 introduced new provisions to address the issue of online defamation.

These include a new defence of publication on a matter of public interest, which can be used if the statement was published in the public interest and the defendant reasonably believed it to be true.

Overall, libel and slander remain important areas of law in the UK, and individuals and organisations need to be aware of their rights and responsibilities when it comes to protecting their reputation or defending against defamatory statements.

The gov.uk website has various help and guidance on Crime, justice and the law.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law Legal Analysis Police

National Security Online Information Team (NSOIT)

counter disinformation unit (cdu)

The National Security Online Information Team (NSOIT) at the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology was allegedly established to bring together cross-government monitoring and analysis capabilities. The National Security Online Information Team (NSOIT) was previously known as the Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU).

Check out the article on the Counter Disinformation Data Platform (CDDP).

It is often said that when a government decides what information is to be disseminated to the people, the institution of government is no longer for the people but for its own self-preservation. The 1949 George Orwell novel Nineteen Eighty Four (1984) had a fictional Ministry of Truth.

On the 3rd June 2023 The Telegraph published an article Elon Musk joins backlash over secret unit curbing lockdown dissent and states “The billionaire Twitter owner condemned the ‘terrible’ tactics used by the Government during the pandemic, as revealed by the Telegraph”

On the 9th June 2023 The Telegraph published an article Covid disinformation unit made ‘hourly contact’ with tech firms, its leader reveals

In response to this article, Dr John Campbell published his own analysis on his YouTube channel which has 2.8 million followers.

Government Counter Disinformation Unit – Dr John Campbell

According to The Telegraph on the 10th June 2023 Twitter refused majority of removal requests from Covid spying unit “Figures show that social media firm refused nearly six out of 10 appeals from UK government CDU”

Molly Kingsley published the following Tweet on the 3rd June 2023 containing evidence of government censorship following a Subject Access Request (SAR) to the CDU at the DCMS.

Molly Kingsley Twitter

The Daily Sceptic published on the 12th June 2023 an article Secretive Government Unit Broke Own Rules by Flagging Opinions as ‘Disinformation’

Originally Published 12th June 2023 – Last Updated Updated 22th July 2023

Big Brother Watch have launched a campaign against the CDU :-

  • Take the first ever legal action in Europe against a government’s ‘counter disinformation’ activity
  • Grow pressure in Parliament for an immediate suspension of the CDU and an investigation into its work
  • Continue our investigation into extra-judicial government censorship and surveillance activities.

Big Brother Watch have published their report Ministry of Truth: the secretive government units spying on your speech which details their findings.

Misinformation from the Counter Disinformation Unit or an MP ?

There is a discrepancy about when the CDU was actually established. The Cabinet Office and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology published a Fact Sheet on the CDU and RRU on the 9th June 2023.

Is the following evidence of Disinformation by the Counter Disinformation Unit or an MP ? 2019 v 2020 ?

The Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU) was first set up within the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport in 2019 and it has since responded to periods of acute disinformation risk including Covid-19.

Fact Sheet on the CDU and RRU

Lucy Powell who is the Labour MP for Manchester South tabled (UIN 98962) the following parliamentary question on the 6th January 2022

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether the cross-Whitehall unit to counter disinformation on covid-19 is operating as of 6 January 2022; how many staff working as part of that unit there are in the (a) Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, (b) Home Office (c) Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, (d) Cabinet Office and (e) Ministry of Defence; and whether the number of staff in each team has increased or decreased since that unit was established in March 2020.

Coronavirus: Disinformation Question for Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport

Chris Philp who is the Conservative MP for Croydon South replied on the 11th January 2022.

The Cross-Whitehall Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU) was established on 5 March 2020, bringing together cross-government monitoring and analysis capabilities. As of 7 January 2022 the CDU is still fully operational.

Addressing the challenges of disinformation and misinformation is a whole of the government effort. The CDU is resourced full time and works in close partnership with cross-government teams. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the size of the team in DCMS has increased. Requirements are continually reviewed to ensure appropriate levels of resourcing, including surge capacity as needed.

When false narratives are identified, the CDU coordinates departments across Whitehall to deploy the appropriate response. This can include a direct rebuttal on social media, flagging content to platforms and ensuring public health campaigns are promoted through reliable sources.

Coronavirus: Disinformation Question for Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport

It is no surprise that Chris Philp MP chose to ignore most of the questions that were asked.

Fact Sheet on the CDU and RRU

The Cabinet Office and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology published a Fact Sheet on the CDU and RRU on the 9th June 2023.

Counter-Disinformation Unit Fact Sheet

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology published the Counter-Disinformation Unit – open source information collection and analysis: privacy notice on the 16th Match 2023.

RESIST 2 Counter Disinformation Toolkit

The Government Communication Service published the RESIST 2 Counter Disinformation Toolkit sometime in 2021 and updated it on the 11th January 2022.

It is unknown if the National Security Online Information Team (NSOIT) use this toolkit.

It is however interesting that this was updated on the same day that Chris Philp MP replied to the question tabled by Lucy Powell MP.

Check out our articles on Office for Communications Data Authorisations, Thought Police, Policing, Police News, Policing by Consent, Police Impartiality, Two Tiered Policing, Wasting Police Time, Counter Disinformation Data Platform (CDDP), Police Professional Standards and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law Legal Analysis

GDPR and Subject Access Requests

gdpr and rights of access (sar)

The Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA) is a law that sets out rules and regulations regarding the use, storage, and sharing of personal data in the United Kingdom (UK).

The Data Protection Act 2018 was introduced to replace the Data Protection Act 1998, and it incorporates the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which is a European Union (EU) regulation that governs data protection across the EU.

In this article, we explore the key features of the DPA and how it relates to GDPR, the role of the Data Protection Officer (DPO), how to make a Subject Access Report (SAR) and data protection complaint to an organisation.

Key Features of the Data Protection Act 2018

The Data Protection Act is a comprehensive piece of legislation that covers all aspects of data protection in the UK. Some of the key features of the DPA include:

  1. Data protection principles: The DPA sets out six data protection principles that organisations must follow when processing personal data. These principles include fairness, lawfulness, transparency, accuracy, storage limitation, and accountability.
  2. Lawful basis for processing: The DPA requires organisations to have a lawful basis for processing personal data. These include consent, contract, legal obligation, vital interests, public interest, and legitimate interests.
  3. Rights of data subjects: The DPA gives individuals the right to access their personal data, request the erasure of their data, and object to the processing of their data. It also gives individuals the right to data portability, which means they can request their data in a portable format.
  4. Data protection officers: The DPA requires certain organisations to appoint a data protection officer (DPO) to oversee their data protection activities.
  5. Data breaches: The DPA requires organisations to report certain types of data breaches to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) within 72 hours of becoming aware of the breach.
  6. Enforcement: The DPA gives the ICO the power to issue fines of up to £17.5 million or 4% of an organization’s global turnover for serious breaches of data protection law.

How the Data Protection Act relates to the GDPR

The DPA incorporates the GDPR into UK law. This means that organisations in the UK must comply with both the DPA and the GDPR. Some of the key ways in which the DPA relates to the GDPR include:

  1. Data protection principles: The data protection principles in the DPA are based on the principles set out in the GDPR. This means that organisations must follow the same principles when processing personal data, regardless of whether they are subject to the DPA or the GDPR.
  2. Lawful basis for processing: The lawful bases for processing personal data in the DPA are based on the lawful bases set out in the GDPR. This means that organisations must have a lawful basis for processing personal data under both the DPA and the GDPR.
  3. Rights of data subjects: The rights of data subjects in the DPA are based on the rights set out in the GDPR. This means that individuals in the UK have the same rights to access their personal data, request the erasure of their data, and object to the processing of their data as individuals in the EU.
  4. Data protection officers: The requirements for appointing a data protection officer in the DPA are based on the requirements set out in the GDPR. This means that organisations in the UK must appoint a DPO if they meet the same criteria as organisations in the EU.
  5. Data breaches: The requirements for reporting data breaches in the DPA are based on the requirements set out in the GDPR. This means that organisations in the UK must report certain types of data breaches to the ICO within 72 hours of becoming aware of the breach, just as organisations in the EU must report certain types of data breaches to their supervisory authority.
  6. Enforcement: The enforcement provisions in the DPA are based on the enforcement provisions set out in the GDPR. This means that the ICO has the power to issue fines of up to £17.5 million or 4% of an organisation’s global turnover for serious breaches of data protection law, just as supervisory authorities in the EU have the power to issue fines under the GDPR.

The ICO Guide to the UK GDPR is part of their Guide to Data Protection and is a must read to fully understand Data Protection and GDPR. The ICO is the UK’s independent body set up to uphold information rights. 

Data Protection Officer (DPO)

The primary role of the Data Protection Officer (DPO) is to ensure that there organisation processes the personal data of its staff, customers, providers or any other individuals (also referred to as data subjects) in compliance with the applicable data protection rules.

  • The UK GDPR introduces a duty for you to appoint a data protection officer (DPO) if you are a public authority or body, or if you carry out certain types of processing activities.
  • DPOs assist you to monitor internal compliance, inform and advise on your data protection obligations, provide advice regarding Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) and act as a contact point for data subjects and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). 
  • The DPO must be independent, an expert in data protection, adequately resourced, and report to the highest management level.
  • A DPO can be an existing employee or externally appointed.
  • In some cases several organisations can appoint a single DPO between them.
  • DPOs can help you demonstrate compliance and are part of the enhanced focus on accountability.
Data Protection Officers ICO

Rights of Access – Subject Access Request

One of the key rights that individuals have under the DPA and the GDPR is the right to access their personal data. This means that individuals can request a copy of the personal data that an organisation holds about them.

  • Individuals have the right to access and receive a copy of their personal data, and other supplementary information.
  • This is commonly referred to as a subject access request or ‘SAR’.
  • Individuals can make SARs verbally or in writing, including via social media.
  • A third party can also make a SAR on behalf of another person.
  • In most circumstances, you cannot charge a fee to deal with a request.
  • You should respond without delay and within one month of receipt of the request.
  • You may extend the time limit by a further two months if the request is complex or if you receive a number of requests from the individual.
  • You should perform a reasonable search for the requested information.
  • You should provide the information in an accessible, concise and intelligible format.
  • The information should be disclosed securely.
  • You can only refuse to provide the information if an exemption or restriction applies, or if the request is manifestly unfounded or excessive.
Rights of Access (SAR) ICO

How to make a Subject Access Report (SAR)

To make a Subject Access Request (SAR), individuals should follow these steps:

  1. Identify the organisation: The first step is to identify the organisation that holds your personal data. This could be your employer, your bank, your healthcare provider, or any other organisation that you have interacted with.
  2. Make a request: Once you have identified the organisation, you should make a subject access request. You can do this by writing to the organisation or filling in a subject access request form, if they have one.
  3. Provide identification: The organisation will need to verify your identity before they can provide you with a copy of your personal data. They may ask for a copy of your passport, driving license, or other form of identification.
  4. Wait for a response: The organisation has 30 days to respond to your subject access request. They may ask for more information or clarification if they need it.
  5. Receive your personal data: Once the organisation has verified your identity and processed your request, they will provide you with a copy of your personal data. This may be in electronic or paper form, depending on how the organisation stores your data.
  6. Review your personal data: Once you have received your personal data, you should review it to ensure that it is accurate and up-to-date. If you find any errors or inaccuracies, you can request that the organisation corrects them.

Make a data protection complaint to an organisation

You can complain to an organisation about how it is handling yours or other people’s information; if it:

  • has not properly responded to your request for your personal information;
  • is not keeping information secure;
  • holds inaccurate information about you;
  • has disclosed information about you;
  • is keeping information about you for longer than is necessary;
  • has collected information for one reason and is using it for something else; or
  • has not upheld any of your data protection rights.
How to make a data protection complaint to an organisation ICO

To make a complaint you must follow the steps below:

  1. Complain directly to the organisation involved
  2. Give the organisation one month to respond to your complaint or request.
  3. Ask the organisation involved for clarification if you don’t understand or you’re unhappy with their response.
  4. Complain to the ICO

If you have followed these steps or the organisation is refusing to respond to you, you can complain to the ICO.

Before you submit a complaint about an organisation you should read about what to expect from the ICO.

In conclusion, the Data Protection Act 2018 is a crucial piece of legislation that sets out the rules and regulations governing data protection in the UK. The DPA incorporates the GDPR into UK law, which means that organisations in the UK must comply with both the DPA and the GDPR.

One of the key rights that individuals have under the DPA and the GDPR is the right to access their personal data. To make a subject access request, individuals should follow the steps outlined above. By following the rules and regulations set out in the DPA and the GDPR, organisations can ensure that they protect the personal data of their customers, employees, and stakeholders.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Free Speech Law Legal Analysis

Domain Names and Freedom of Expression

Freedom of Expression

The Ministry of Injustice have a number of domains names that can be used to access the MOI and other websites.

All domains are used for a lawful purpose in line with the relevant domain registry rules. The domains are clearly not being used to commit fraud or deceive the public.

A few of the MOI domain names have recently been temporarily suspended by Nominet and then reactivated having followed their verification process.

One particular domain name has been suspended and reactivated twice following a report to Nominet by the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB).

I am told suspension is “Something you are just going to have to live with”.

Freedom of expression

1 Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.

2 The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

Article 10 of the Human Rights Act

If the public authorities don’t like certain domain names being used, then why didn’t they register them for themselves ?

MOI domains

btppolice.uk
ci5.uk
cityoflondonpolice.uk
cjsm.uk
cpsgov.uk
hampshirepolice.uk
hertspolice.uk
judges.uk
justice.me.uk
met-police.uk
mi5gov.uk
mi6gov.uk
ministryofinjustice.co.uk
ministryofinjustice.com
ministryofinjustice.uk
moi.me.uk
ncagov.uk
pdspolice.uk
roguelawyer.co.uk
royalcourtsofjustice.co.uk
royalcourtsofjustice.uk
unlawful.co.uk
sisgov.uk
sussexpolice.uk
sussex-police.uk
thesecretbarrister.co.uk
west-midlands-police.uk

Terms & Conditions of Domain Name Registration – The contract a Registrant enters into with Nominet when they register a .UK domain name.

Rules of Registration – The rules for the registration and use of domain names within the .UK domain and its sub-domains. These rules form part of our Terms & Conditions of Domain Name Registration and are part of the Registrant’s contract with Nominet.

Criminal Practices Policy – How we address criminal activity in .UK, .cymru and .wales. This policy is also available in Welsh.

DRS Policy – the rules and procedures governing our Dispute Resolution Service. Understanding these rules is vital.

List of .gov.uk domain names

A list of active .gov.uk domain names is updated once a year by the Central Digital and Data Office.

List of .gov.uk domain names as of 13th January 2025

For some reason this list was not updated in 2024 ?

Domain Squatting and Cyber Security ?

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Legal Analysis

You Can Leave Your Hat On at Horsham County Court

horsham county court hats on security

On the 4th July 2023 at 9.30am a McKenzie Friend and I went through “strict” airport style security at Horsham County Court in Hurst Rd, Horsham RH12 2ET.

Horsham County Court Entrance

Pockets were emptied into a tray and my laptop bag was searched by a Security guard using a torch taped to a ruler. Very unusual apparatus operated by a security guard in a shirt that was once white !

Horsham County Court Security and Staff Smoking Area

At least he and the other security guards were displaying their SIA badges as required by law under Section 9 of the Private Security Industry Act 2001.

One of the Security guards was obviously under pressure to secure the Court building as he was regularly going outside for a smoke !

Hats on Security at Horsham County Court

Inadvertently I left my Eurostar hat on (as pictured) and I wore it during the security screening including going through the airport style metal detector.

At no time was I asked to remove the hat nor was it scanned using the handheld scanner. The CCTV from the Court building, if working, would confirm this. I could request this footage from the Court by submitting a Subject Access Request.

The article Going through security at a court or tribunal building is published on the gov.uk website and explains the security when you enter a court or tribunal building.

You’ll go through a security check, like you would at an airport. This may include:

  • emptying your pockets into a tray
  • taking off your shoes, coat, gloves or hat
  • being asked to take off or open your belt
  • walking through an archway detector
  • being checked by hand or with a handheld scanner

If you’re wearing a head covering for religious or cultural reasons, you can ask for it to be checked with a handheld scanner so you do not have to take it off.

Going Through Security – gov.uk

The guidance says “may” which is a little odd.

In my opinion, the Security staff at Horsham County Court failed to do their job properly. I do not think a Eurostar hat could ever be classed as a head covering for religious or cultural reasons !

At Horsham County Court it seems that you can leave your hat on !

Horsham County Court Royal Coat of Arms

Horsham County Court Literature

There were a number of leaflet holders in the waiting area that were empty apart from a leaflet about “Restorative Justice For You” and one containing a Mars Bar Wrapper that has been there for at least 3 months !

“Restorative Justice For You” mentions the Sussex Criminal Justice Board.

Restorative Justice For You – Sussex Criminal Justice Board

Are the Sussex Criminal Justice Board as dodgy as the Sussex Family Justice Board ? The MOI will be investigating for a future article.

Horsham County Court Security Review

Horsham County Court Security staff made regular security patrols which was very reassuring. I am aware there were VIP’s in the building including my mentor DDJ Mills !

They used a phone to scan targets that were a circle with a cross hand drawn with a black sharpie on a Tipp-Ex background. Improvisation that rivals the skills of MacGyver.

I couldn’t help but notice that there was a lot of network cables in trunking attached to the ceiling that were secured with red cable ties. This is assumed to be for a secure network, however there were gaps in the trunking and the cables were exposed where they entered the wall. No doubt the Ministry of Justice/HMCTS IT will want to review this as a security risk.

In summary :-

  • Horsham Security should review their Airport Style security. Can you leave your hat on ?
  • Improve the appearance of their security staff.
  • Horsham Court staff or the Ministry of Justice/HMCTS should review their smoking policy on Court premises.
  • MoJ/HMCTS IT to review the secure cabling.

I will back to Horsham County Court in October 2023 to review again.

You may be interested in the article about the Royal Courts of Justice which explains Court security and spoons !

Check out our articles on R v Sussex Justices, Dodgy Judges, HHJ Farquhar, HHJ Bedford, Can you Criticise a Judge ? and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Police

His Majestys Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services

HMICFRS

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) independently assesses and reports, in the public interest, on the effectiveness and efficiency of police forces and fire & rescue services.

“Promoting improvements in policing and fire & rescue services to make everyone safer”

HMICFRS ask the questions that they believe the public wish to have answered, and publish their findings, conclusions and recommendations. HMICFRS use their expertise to interpret the evidence and make recommendations for improvement.

Police and crime commissioners are required to publish their comments on each HMICFRS report within 56 days of its publication, and must include an explanation of the steps to be taken in response to each HMICFRS recommendation or an explanation of why no action has been or is to be taken in that respect.

HMICFRS Powers

HMICFRS provide authoritative information to allow the public to compare the performance of their police force and fire & rescue service against others. HMICFRS also routinely monitor the performance of police forces in England and Wales.

HMICFRS inspects across England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

HMICFRS also inspect law enforcement arrangements in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, on invitation from the relevant government, as well as non-territorial services, specialist agencies and international police forces.

Read the latest HMICFRS inspection of Sussex Police and the Met Police.

History of HMICFRS

For over 160 years, His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) independently inspected and reported on the efficiency and effectiveness of police forces.

On the 150th anniversary of HMIC in July 2006, a book The History of Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary, The First 150 Years was produced.

In the summer of 2017 HMIC took on the inspections of England’s fire and rescue services, inspecting and reporting on their efficiency, effectiveness and people.

To reflect this new role, HMIC changed their name to HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS).

Public Interest

HMICFRS Police Inspections :-

HMICFRS’s annual inspection programme and framework for police forces in England and Wales is subject to the approval of the Home Secretary under the Police Act 1996.

The Home Secretary may also require HMICFRS to carry out further inspections of police forces, beyond the terms of the annual inspection programme. Local policing bodies may commission HMICFRS to do inspections in their force areas, although HMICFRS is not required to accept any such commission.

In devising its policing inspection programme and framework for the Home Secretary’s approval, HMICFRS considers the risks to the public, service quality, public concerns, the operating environment, the effect which inspection may have on a force, and the benefits to the public of improvements which may follow inspection.

HMICFRS may also carry out inspections of police forces on its own initiative if it considers that the performance or circumstances of a force merit it.

HMICFRS Public Interest

HMICFRS Fire & rescue service inspections :-

The Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004 provides that HMICFRS will inspect and report on the efficiency and effectiveness of fire & rescue authorities in England.

HMICFRS’s inspection programme and framework for fire and rescue authorities in England is subject to the approval of the Home Secretary.

The Home Secretary may also require HMICFRS to carry out further inspections of any or all fire and rescue services in England.

In its inspections, HMICFRS focuses on the efficiency and effectiveness of each English fire and rescue authority and how well it looks after its people. HMICFRS may also on its own initiative carry out an inspection not in its inspection programme and framework if it considers that the performance or circumstances of the fire and rescue authority merit it.

HMICFRS Public Interest

HMICFRS Powers

HMICFRS is an inspectorate, not a regulator. Inspectorates have powers to secure information, but no powers to give orders for change. Recommendations are not orders.

Regulators, on the other hand, have powers of intervention, direction and enforcement.

It is for chief constables (whose operational independence is a cornerstone of British policing), police and crime commissioners (with powers to set local priorities and budgets) and, in extreme cases, the Home Secretary (who has ultimate democratic responsibility for policing) to take action as a result of HMICFRS’s recommendations. The same applies to the fire & rescue service itself, and the fire & rescue authorities.

HMICFRS Powers

Recent HMICFRS Publications

RSS Error: Retrieved unsupported status code "403"

Check out our articles on Sussex Police, What is Policing by Consent, Two Tier Policing, Wasting Police Time and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Legal Analysis

Do You Have to Bow to a Judge ?

Bow to a Judge

The Royal Coat of Arms appear in every courtroom in England and Wales (with the exception of the Magistrates’ court in the City of London*), to demonstrate that justice comes from the monarch and that a law court is part of the Royal Court.

The presence of the Royal Arms explains why lawyers and court officials bow to the judge or magistrates’ bench when they enter the room. They aren’t bowing to the judge – they are bowing to the coat of arms, to show respect for the King’s justice.

Traditions of the courts judiciary.uk

According to the HM Courts & Tribunals Service article What to expect coming to a court or tribunal :-

You may see some people bow to the judge or magistrate when they walk in or out of the hearing room. You don’t have to do this, but you can if you want to.

What to expect coming to a court or tribunal HMCTS

It’s interesting that HMCTS think that “people” are bowing to the judge or magistrate when this is clearly wrong according the judiciary !

In answer the question Do You Have to Bow to a Judge ? :-

No you do not have to bow to a Judge.

Check out our articles on HHJ Farquhar, HHJ Bedford, Dodgy Judges, Can you Criticise a Judge ?, Etiquette and Manners in Court and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Rule of Law - Open Justice - Policing By Consent