Category: Judiciary

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) are an independent office which supports the Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice in considering complaints about the personal conduct of judicial office holders.

It was established in 2006, following the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, which reformed the way in which judges are appointed, disciplined and removed from office.

Make sure to read our article about the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board (SFJB) and its board members such as His Honour Judge Farquhar.

JCIO Annual Report 2024-2025

‘The commissioner’s decision is that the JCIO is not a statutory body. He finds that the JCIO is part of the MoJ which is a public authority for the purposes of FOIA. By failing to confirm whether it held the requested information within 20 working days, the MoJ has breached sections 1(1)(a) and 10(1) of FOIA.’

Judicial Conduct Investigations Office must comply with FoI requests

Rules and Regulations

• Misconduct and Recommending Sanctions
• The Judicial Discipline (Prescribed Procedures) Regulations 2023
• The Judicial Conduct Rules 2023
• The Judicial Conduct (Magistrates) Rules 2023
• The Judicial Discipline (Prescribed Procedures) Regulations 2014
• Judicial Conduct (Magistrates) Rules 2014
• Judicial Conduct (Judicial) Rules 2014
• Judicial Conduct (Tribunals) Rules 2014
• Judicial Conduct (Tribunals) (Amendment of Offices) Rules 2017
• Employment Tribunal (Scotland) – Making a complaint of Judicial Misconduct about an Employment Judge

How to Complain

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can only deal with complaints about the personal conduct of judicial office holders. This means that they cannot accept complaints about a judge’s decision or the way a judge has managed a case.

The JCIO Making A Complaint website contains all the details along with the link to the JCIO portal.

Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC) – 2004

Before the establishment of the JCIO, the responsibility for investigating complaints against judges rested with the Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC), which was established in 2004. The OJC was a part of the Ministry of Justice and had the power to investigate complaints made against judges in England and Wales.

However, the OJC was widely criticized for being insufficiently independent and for lacking transparency. In response to these criticisms, the government established the JCIO in 2006 as an independent body to investigate complaints against judges.

Judicial Complaints Investigation Bureau (JCIB) -1991

Before the Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC) was established in 2004, the responsibility for investigating complaints against judges in England and Wales rested with the Judicial Complaints Investigation Bureau (JCIB), which was created in 1991.

The JCIB was a division of the Lord Chancellor’s Department (which later became the Ministry of Justice), and it was responsible for investigating complaints about the personal conduct of judges. However, the JCIB was criticized for being insufficiently independent and for lacking transparency, particularly following a high-profile case in 1993 involving a judge who was found to have used racist language.

JCIO Powers

The JCIO is responsible for investigating complaints about the personal conduct of judges, as well as their professional conduct. It has the power to investigate complaints made by members of the public, legal professionals, and other judges.

The JCIO’s investigations are carried out by a team of investigators who are independent of the judiciary.

Overall, the establishment of the JCIO was seen as an important step in ensuring the independence and integrity of the judiciary in England and Wales.

Disciplinary Statements

You can check if a a judge has had any disciplinary action against them as Disciplinary statements are published on the JCIO website and are sorted by year.

The JCIO publication policy states that a statement will normally be published when a disciplinary sanction has been issued to a judicial office-holder for misconduct.

The Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor may decide jointly to:

• issue a statement in any case;
• decline to issue a statement in any case;
• delete a statement prior to the expiration of the relevant publication period.

Publication Periods

Statements published before 22 August 2022

Statements about cases which resulted in a sanction below removal from office will be deleted after one year. Statements about cases which resulted in removal from office will be deleted after five years.

Statements published from 22 August 2022

The following publication periods apply to statements published from 22 August 2022. Following the outcome of the 2020-22 review of the disciplinary system, statements now contain more detail. The JCIO privacy notice has been updated to reflect this change.

Sanction Imposed	Publication Period
Formal Advice	Two Years
Formal Warning	Four Years
Reprimand	Six Years
Removal from Office (except for failure to meet minimum sitting requirements)	Indefinite
Removal from Office for failure to meet minimum sitting requirements	Five years

Requesting a Copy of a Deleted Statement

A copy of any statement which has been deleted following expiration of its publication period can be requested by emailing: [email protected]

Requesters must state the name of the office-holder. It will also help to locate statements if requesters give as much information as possible about the nature of the conduct for which the office-holder received a disciplinary sanction, and the year in which they believe the statement was published.

JCIO aims to reply to all requests for deleted statements within 10 working days.

JCIO Publication Policy

JCIO Disciplinary Statements 2026/2027

• Mr Paul Gibson JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 12/26
• Mrs Jacqueline Caldwell-Barr JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 11/26
• Tribunal Judge Stephen Reeder – JCIO Investigation Statement 10/26
• District Judge Joanne Redmond – JCIO Investigation Statement 09/26
• District Judge Allan Pickup – JCIO Investigation Statement 08/26
• Employment Judge Simon Loy – JCIO Investigation Statement 07/26
• Ms Shanelle Nwanaebi JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 06/26
• Upper Tribunal Judge Jonathan Perkins – JCIO Investigation Statement 05/26
• Tribunal Judge David Roberts – JCIO Investigation Statement 04/26
• Mrs Christine Parry JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 03/26
• Ms Neelam Saddique JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 02/26
• Mrs Adele Rugen JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 01/26
• Miss Louise Hall JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 103/25
• Employment Judge Stephen Shore – JCIO Investigation Statement 102/25
• His Honour Judge Richard Roberts – JCIO Investigation Statement 101/25
• Mr Simon Fawthrop JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 100/25
• Mr Justice Derek Sweeting – JCIO Investigation Statement 99/25
• Mr William Wells JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 98/25
• Mr Benjamin Gravestock JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 97/25

JCIO Disciplinary Statements 2025/2026

• Tribunal Judge Alex Hobbs – JCIO Investigation Statement 96/25
• Mr Alfred Bean JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 95/25
• Mr Robert Waugh JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 94/25
• Ms Rachel Onikosi JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 93/25
• Ms Fiona Williams JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 92/25
• Mr Gurdev Dadral JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 91/25
• Tribunal Judge Mohammed Bashir – JCIO Investigation Statement 90/25
• Ms Jocelyn Harrow JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 89/25
• Mr Kenneth Joe JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 88/25
• Mr Andrew Kerr JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 87/25
• Mr Derek Muhammad JP – JCIO Investigations Statement 85/25
• Mr Nicholas Letherby JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 84/25
• Mr Adrian Kermode JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 83/25
• Mr Morris Suckall JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 82/25
• Employment Judge Richard Nicolle – JCIO Investigation Statement 81/25
• Ms Michelle Bevan-Margetts JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 80/25
• Assistant Coroner Louise Wiltshire – JCIO Investigation Statement 79/25
• Dr Jane Dewar – JCIO Investigation Statement 78/25
• Employment Judge Paul Cadney – JCIO Investigation Statement 77/25
• Mr Lascelles Haughton JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 76/25
• Mr David Whitehead JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 75/25
• District Judge (Magistrates Court) Stephen Leake – JCIO Investigation Statement 74/25
• Mr John Parfitt JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 73/25
• Mrs Roberta Hall JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 72/25
• Mr Steven Kinchington JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 71/25
• Mrs Nicola Walker JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 70/25
• Mrs Rebecca Reeves JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 69/25
• Mr Sarfraz Uddin JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 68/25
• Miss Jennifer Reay JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 67/25
• District Judge Colin Bosman – JCIO Investigation Statement 66/25
• Miss Angela Cahill JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 65/25
• Mr Mark Lenderyou JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 64/25
• Employment Judge Philip Lancaster – JCIO Investigation Statement 63/25
• Recorder David Mason KC – JCIO Investigation Statement 62/25
• Mr Nick Johnston JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 61/25
• Assistant Coroner Hannah Mettam – JCIO Investigation Statement 60/25
• Craig Rydqvist JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 59/25
• Clive Powell JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 58/25
• Evelyn McCann JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 57/25
• Mrs Jill Clarke JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 56/25
• District Judge (Magistrates Court) Leo Pyle – JCIO Investigation Statement 55/25
• Employment Judge Laura Howden-Evans – JCIO Investigation Statement 54/25
• Mrs Madeleine Bonser JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 53/25
• Mrs Jane Taylor JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 52/25
• Dr Anna Duke – JCIO Investigation Statement 51/25
• Ms Susan Kelly JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 50/25
• Ms Kate Waghorn JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 49/25
• Ms Gillian Sebright JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 48/25
• Dr Amy Delicate JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 47/25
• Mr Michael Muldoon JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 46/25
• Mr John Garforth JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 45/25
• Ms Nicola Baldwin JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 44/25
• Mr Andrew Dawson JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 43/25
• Mrs Marisa Austin-Knowles – JCIO Investigation Statement 42/25
• Dr Sujata Chadha – JCIO Investigation Statement 41/25
• Her Honour Judge Fiona Shanks – JCIO Investigation Statement 40/25
• Employment Judge Catrin Lewis – JCIO Investigation Statement 39/25
• Mr Ramesh Nayak JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 38/75
• Recorder Paul Kirtley – JCIO Investigation Statement 37/25
• Mr David Armitage JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 34/25
• Mr Joe Bangudu JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 33/25
• Mrs Angela Bradshaw JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 32/25
• Deputy District Judge Michael Horton KC – JCIO Investigation Statement 31/25
• Miss Linda Hill JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 30/25
• Mr Martin Dominique JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 29/25
• Mrs Shirley Holmes JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 28/25
• Her Honour Judge Martine Kushner – JCIO Investigation Statement 27/25
• Mr Edmund Sutton JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 26/25
• Mr Alfred Bean JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 25/25
• Mr Terry Regan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 24/25
• Mr Peter Chapman JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 23/25
• Mrs Sharanjit Sandhu JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 22/25
• Mrs Fiona Jones JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 21/25
• Ms Amie Canham JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 20/25
• Mr Robert Walker JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 19/25
• Senior Coroner Caroline Sumeray – JCIO Investigation Statement 18/25
• Recorder James Howlett – JCIO Investigation Statement 17/25
• Deputy District Judge Danny Glaser – JCIO Investigation Statement 16/25
• Her Honour Judge Kharin Cox – JCIO Investigation Statement 15/25
• Ms Abiola Onatade JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 14/25
• Mrs Karen Earnshaw JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 13/25
• Mrs Jane Greasley JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 12/25
• District Judge Christopher Falvey – JCIO Investigation Statement 11/25
• Mrs Susanna Craig JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 10/25
• District Judge Christopher Falvey – JCIO Investigation Statement 09/25
• Dr Charles Jumbo JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 08/25
• Non-legal Tribunal Member Mr Mark Harding – JCIO Investigation Statement 07/25
• Mr Anderson Jordan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 06/25
• Mrs Christine Parry JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 05/25
• Mr Andrew York JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 04/25
• Employment Judge Gary Denis Tobin – JCIO Investigation Statement 03/25

JCIO Disciplinary Statements 2024/2025

• Tribunal Judge Jenna McKinney – JCIO Investigation Statement 02/25
• Mr Mark Gray JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 119/24
• Employment Judge Richard Nicolle – JCIO Investigation Statement 118/24
• Reverend Terence Young JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 117/24
• Deputy District Judge James Lewis – JCIO Investigation Statement 116/24
• Deputy District Judge Daniel Dodd – JCIO Investigation Statement 115/24
• Deputy District Judge Emily May Windsor – JCIO Investigation Statement 114/24
• Mr Michael Berry JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 113/24
• Russell Blake JP -JCIO Investigation Statement 112/24
• Mr Graham Curry JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 111/24
• Mr Mohammad Hussain JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 110/24
• Mr Ahmed Azam JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 109/24
• Mrs Justice McGowan DBE – JCIO Investigation Statement 108/24
• Deputy District Judge Toby Hales – JCIO Investigation Statement 107/24
• Mr Adrian Jones JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 105/24
• Mr Martin Dominique JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 104/24
• Mr Richard Giugno JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 103/24
• District Judge Colin Bosman (‘DJ Bosman’) – JCIO Investigation Statement 102/24
• Ms Virginia Claire Jackson JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 101/24
• Mr Abdul Malik JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 100/24
• Employment Judge Liam Varnam (EJ Varnam) – JCIO Investigation Statement 99/24
• Mrs Jane Bailey JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 98/24
• Ms Susan Holcroft JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 97/24
• Miss Panama Jahan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 96/24
• Miss Catherine Burns JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 95/24
• Miss Nina Reinach JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 94/24
• Miss Hilary Whiteway JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 92/24
• Mr Michael Barnes JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 91/24
• Mr Edwin Hastings-Smith JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 90/24
• Ms Justine Dyson JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 89/24
• Mr Kirk Master JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 88/24
• District Judge Alison Griffiths – JCIO Investigation Statement 87/24
• District Judge Franklin Evans – JCIO Investigation Statement 86/24
• District Judge Denise Saunders – JCIO Investigation Statement 85/24
• Dr Andrew Easton – JCIO Investigation Statement 84/24
• Mr Jonathan Dannatt JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 83/24
• Ms Valerie Humphrey JP -JCIO Investigation Statement 82/24
• Mr Daniel Barker JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 81/24
• Mr Joseph Lindo JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 80/24
• Mr Gary Morgan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 79/24
• Mr David Payne JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 78/24
• Nargis Alsadiq JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 77/24
• Tribunal Judge Jonathan Perkins – JCIO Investigation Statement 76/24
• Elizabeth Slamer JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 75/24
• Mr Thomas Rock JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 74/24
• Dr Atul Gandecha JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 73/24
• Employment Judge David Khan – JCIO Investigation Statement 72/24
• Mr Richard Whitehouse – JCIO Investigation Statement 71/24
• District Judge Michael Nicholson – JCIO Investigation Statement 70/24
• District Judge Keeley Bishop – JCIO Investigation Statement 69/24
• Dr Elizabeth Wooffinden – JCIO Investigation Statement 68/24
• Mr Mohammed Najib – JCIO Investigation Statement 67/24
• Miss Fazila Karolia – JCIO Investigation Statement 66/24
• District Judge (Magistrates Court) Stephen Leake – JCIO Investigation Statement 65/24
• Recorder Yvette Genn – JCIO Investigation Statement 64/24
• Recorder Edward Renvoize – JCIO Investigation Statement 63/24
• Mr Phillip Roberts – JCIO Investigation Statement 62/24
• Mr Jeremy Betts JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 61/24
• Tribunal Judge Lynn Griffin – JCIO Investigation Statement 60/24
• Deputy District Judge Sarah Ellis – JCIO Investigation Statement 59/24
• Mr Alistair Borland JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 58/24
• Recorder Simon Bickler – JCIO Statement 57/24
• Mr Keith O’Brien – JCIO Investigation Statement 56/24
• Miss Tessa Smith JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 55/24
• Ms Lynn Killoran JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 54/24
• His Honour Judge Martin Davis – JCIO Investigation Statement 52/24
• Dr Rajay Arora JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 50/24
• Mrs Jean Banford JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 49/24
• Mr Michael Woodhouse JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 48/24
• Dr Simon Ward – JCIO Investigation Statement 47/24
• Senior Coroner Martin Fleming – JCIO Investigation Statement 46/24
• Mrs Jayne Harding JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 45/24
• Mr Manjit Cheema JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 44/24
• Insolvency and Companies Court (ICC) Judge Catherine Burton – JCIO Investigation Statement 43/24
• Assistant Coroner Heath Westerman – JCIO Investigation Statement 42/24
• Mr Justice Marcus Smith – JCIO Investigation Statement 41/24
• Deputy District Judge Dinshaw Printer – JCIO Investigation Statement 40/24
• Mr Timothy Nathan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 38/24
• Mr Jeremy Purkis – JCIO Investigation Statement 37/24
• His Honour Judge Steven Everett – JCIO Investigation Statement 36/24
• Mr Richard Morris JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 35/24
• Deputy District Judge Adrian White – JCIO Investigation Statement 34/24
• Ms Natalia Schiffrin JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 33/24
• Mrs Anne Toomer JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 32/24
• Mr Timothy Vogel JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 31/24
• Mr Charles Peck JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 30/24
• Deputy Senior District Judge Tanweer Ikram – JCIO Investigation Statement 29/24
• Mr Justice Picken – JCIO Investigation Statement 28/24
• Mr Justin Johnson JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 27/24
• Declan Ball JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 26/24
• Recorder Andrew Tidbury – JCIO Investigation Statement 25/24
• Ms Shaistah Zeidan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 24/24
• Mr Andrew Sturgess JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 23/24
• Mrs Ijeoma McDougall JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 22/24
• District Judge Najma Mian – JCIO Investigation Statement 21/24
• Don Wicks JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 20/24
• Mr Nicholas Preston – JCIO Investigation Statement 19/24
• Robert Gonouya JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 18/24
• Mr Justice Francis – JCIO Investigation Statement 17/24

Sanctions for misconduct by judicial office-holders are set out in the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. They are, in order of severity: formal advice, formal warning, reprimand and removal from office.

Check out our articles on Dodgy Judges, Judges Salaries and Fees, Can you Criticise a Judge, Can you Email a Judge ?, Do you Have to Bow to a Judge ?, His Honour Now His Dishonour, His Honour Melbourne Inman KC, His Honour Judge Jeremy Richardson KC, His Honour Judge Michael Slater, His Honour Judge Martin Davis, HHJ Farquhar and the highly dubious Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

• 
  What is Two Tier Policing ?
  The BBC describes so-called “two-tier policing” as where right-wing protests… Read more: What is Two Tier Policing ?
• 
  Lawful Use of Handcuffs by the Police
  Handcuffs are a standard restraint tool used by police officers… Read more: Lawful Use of Handcuffs by the Police
• 
  His Honour Judge Nicholas Rowland
  Judge Nicholas Edward Rowland, known as His Honour Judge Nicholas… Read more: His Honour Judge Nicholas Rowland
• 
  Police Barred and Advisory Lists
  The police barred and advisory lists, which are managed by… Read more: Police Barred and Advisory Lists
• 
  President of the Family Division
  The President of the Family Division is a highly esteemed… Read more: President of the Family Division
• 
  Is Crimestoppers Anonymous ?
  Crimestoppers is widely promoted as the United Kingdom’s leading provider… Read more: Is Crimestoppers Anonymous ?
• 
  What is a Court Legal Adviser ?
  In magistrates’ courts across England and Wales, lay justices (magistrates… Read more: What is a Court Legal Adviser ?
• 
  What is a Skeleton Argument ?
  A skeleton argument is a concise written document prepared by… Read more: What is a Skeleton Argument ?
• 
  Can you Buy a Judge ?
  His Honour Judge Martin John Cook was for sale, in… Read more: Can you Buy a Judge ?
• 
  Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Dodgy Fire Sticks
  Norwich Pharmacal orders (NPOs) are a form of court-ordered disclosure… Read more: Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Dodgy Fire Sticks
• 
  What is a Statutory Instrument ?
  A statutory instrument is the most common form of secondary… Read more: What is a Statutory Instrument ?
• 
  The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013
  In October 2013, the Treasury laid before Parliament a short… Read more: The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

The title Chief Magistrate holds historical and contemporary significance in various legal and governmental systems across the world.

The Senior District Judge (Chief Magistrate) of England and Wales, as they are known, has a leadership responsibility for the 300-or-so District Judges (Magistrates’ Court) (DJMCs), and Deputy DJMCs across England and Wales.

The Chief Magistrate has no authority over lay magistrates, or over the several hundreds of district judges who sit in the county courts of England and Wales.

The current Chief Magistrate of England and Wales is Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring.

The current Deputy Chief Magistrate of England and Wales is Senior Deputy District Judge Tanweer Ikram CBE.

The position of Chief Magistrate, often laden with authority and responsibility, embodies the essence of governance, justice, and leadership within a jurisdiction.

The Chief Magistrate is responsible for:

• hearing many of the most sensitive or complex cases in the magistrates’ courts and in particular extradition and special jurisdiction cases.
• supporting and guiding district judge (magistrates’ court) colleagues.
• liaising with the senior judiciary and Presiding Judges on matters relating to magistrates’ courts and district judges (magistrates’ courts).

The Chief Magistrate’s Office is also responsible for arranging sittings of Deputy DJMCs across England and Wales, and managing the hearings of disciplinary adjudications in prisons. Where a disciplinary offence by a prisoner merits additional days of imprisonment, full-time district judges are deployed to prisons to hear the cases. Requests come from prisons throughout the country – a list of cases is then built up, and when a sufficient number of cases has been generated, a judge attends the prison to hear them.

Chief Magistrate Courts and Tribunal Judiciary

Deputy Chief Magistrate of England and Wales Controvesy

Three women convicted of terror offence for ‘celebrating’ Hamas attack on Israel by displaying images of paragliders at pro-Palestinian march were spared jail as the Deputy Chief Magistrate of England and Wales, Senior Deputy District Judge Tanweer Ikram CBE says he ‘decided not to punish’ them after ’emotions ran very high’.

For this offence, Section 13(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000 allows for :-

(a)imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months,
(b)a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or
(c)both.

Why did the Deputy Chief Magistrate “let them off” so lightly ?

On the 11th June 2024 Deputy Senior District Judge Tanweer Ikram CBE was issued with a formal warning for misconduct by the JCIO.

The Deputy Chief Magistrate of England and Wales inadvertent ‘liking’ of a post had resulted in a perception of bias. The Lord Chancellor and the Lady Chief Justice were not satisfied that a sanction of formal advice was sufficient in this case as he had caused “significant reputational damage to the judiciary”.

A row has broken out after a judge who decided to let three women wearing parachute images at a pro-Palestine march walk free admitted to liking a social media post branding Israel a ‘terrorist’.

Tanweer Ikram is facing calls to be investigated for a conflict of interest after he liked a LinkedIn post calling for a ‘free Palestine ‘ by a barrister who had previously promoted conspiracy theories claiming that Israel allowed the October 7 attack.

The senior district judge admitted to liking the post ‘by mistake’ three weeks ago, but was told by the Judicial Office that the matter would not be investigated further.

Daily Mail – Senior Deputy District Judge Tanweer Ikram

History of the Chief Magistrate

From ancient times to modern democracies, the chief magistrate has played a pivotal role in upholding the rule of law, ensuring the administration of justice, and maintaining social order.

Historically, the term “magistrate” finds its roots in ancient Rome, where magistrates held considerable power in the Roman Republic.

They were responsible for the administration of justice, overseeing public ceremonies, and enforcing laws. The chief magistrate, known as the “consul,” was the highest-ranking official elected to lead the republic for a term of one year. Their authority was balanced by the Senate and other governmental bodies, reflecting a system of checks and balances.

When the first Chief Magistrate began sitting at Bow Street in 1735, the title wasn’t confusing at all – at the time, magistrates in London were paid judicial office-holders, and magistrates’ courts in London were presided over by Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrates.  All magistrates – paid and unpaid – are Justices of the Peace. Nowadays the word magistrate is more commonly used for the unpaid judicial office holders, also commonly known as JPs.

Early holders of the post also had responsibility for the Bow Street Runners, until they were replaced by the Metropolitan Police in the 19th century.

Chief Magistrate’s Office

The Chief Magistrate’s Office provides administrative support both to the Chief Magistrate and to district judges sitting at all the magistrates’ courts in England and Wales.

The Chief Magistrate’s Office is based at:

181 Marylebone Road
London
NW1 5BR

DX 120551, Marylebone 9

Email addresses:

Chief Magistrates’ Office enquiries mailbox: [email protected]

Judicial Deployment mailbox: [email protected]

Independent Adjudication mailbox : [email protected]

Chief Magistrate’s Office

Check out our related articles on Judiciary, Complain About a Magistrate, Dodgy Magistrates, Rule of Law, Open Justice, Is the Law Black and White ?, Abuse of Process, What Does Lady Justice Symbolise ?, McKenzie Friend, Law Society, Law Commission, McKenzie Friend Right of Audience, Solicitors, Solicitors Regulation Authority, Barristers, Bar Council of England and Wales, Bar Standards Board, R v Sussex Justices, Police Impartiality and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

• 
  What is Two Tier Policing ?
  The BBC describes so-called “two-tier policing” as where right-wing protests… Read more: What is Two Tier Policing ?
• 
  Lawful Use of Handcuffs by the Police
  Handcuffs are a standard restraint tool used by police officers… Read more: Lawful Use of Handcuffs by the Police
• 
  His Honour Judge Nicholas Rowland
  Judge Nicholas Edward Rowland, known as His Honour Judge Nicholas… Read more: His Honour Judge Nicholas Rowland
• 
  Police Barred and Advisory Lists
  The police barred and advisory lists, which are managed by… Read more: Police Barred and Advisory Lists
• 
  President of the Family Division
  The President of the Family Division is a highly esteemed… Read more: President of the Family Division
• 
  Is Crimestoppers Anonymous ?
  Crimestoppers is widely promoted as the United Kingdom’s leading provider… Read more: Is Crimestoppers Anonymous ?
• 
  What is a Court Legal Adviser ?
  In magistrates’ courts across England and Wales, lay justices (magistrates… Read more: What is a Court Legal Adviser ?
• 
  What is a Skeleton Argument ?
  A skeleton argument is a concise written document prepared by… Read more: What is a Skeleton Argument ?
• 
  Can you Buy a Judge ?
  His Honour Judge Martin John Cook was for sale, in… Read more: Can you Buy a Judge ?
• 
  Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Dodgy Fire Sticks
  Norwich Pharmacal orders (NPOs) are a form of court-ordered disclosure… Read more: Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Dodgy Fire Sticks
• 
  What is a Statutory Instrument ?
  A statutory instrument is the most common form of secondary… Read more: What is a Statutory Instrument ?
• 
  The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013
  In October 2013, the Treasury laid before Parliament a short… Read more: The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Here are a few examples of dodgy judges of England and Wales, otherwise known as rogue judges, that have been dismissed, disciplined, resigned or just been badly behaved. Some judges even managed to get criminal convictions.

“Publicity is the very soul of justice. . . . It keeps the judge himself, while trying, under trial….Where there is no publicity there is no justice”

Jeremy Bentham – Mr Justice Cobb: ‘Justice must be seen to be done’

The three key values which are central to the role of judicial office holders (JOHs) in England and Wales are:
• Independence
• Impartiality
• Integrity

Someone sent a little legal valentines love by post ❤️ Is HHJ Helen Lusty corrupt ? Sussex Family Justice Board ?

In my opinion, these judges are almost as questionable as His Honour Judge Melbourne Inman KC, Mr Justice Williams, Sussex Family Justice Board and the Sussex judges HHJ Farquhar, HHJ Bedford and HHJ Lusty !

1. Judge Constance Briscoe was dismissed from the judiciary in 2014 after being found guilty of perverting the course of justice. She was sentenced to 16 months in prison for lying to the police during an investigation into former cabinet minister Chris Huhne’s speeding points.

Reference: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28675376

2. Judge Peter Smith resigned in 2016 after the JCIO began investigating Smith’s conduct in July 2015 about a matter involving British Airways and his luggage.

Reference : https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/conduct-probe-into-high-court-judge-ends-with-retirement/5063448.article

3. Judge Beatrice Bolton. The Crown Court judge who was convicted of failing to control a dangerous dog will face no further disciplinary action after she handed in her resignation..

Reference : https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/judge-beatrice-bolton-quits-after-1340889

4. Judge Heather Perrin was dismissed from the judiciary in 2012 after being found guilty of professional misconduct for deceiving a client in a property deal.

Reference: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-20525832

5.  Deputy Senior District Judge Tanweer Ikram CBE was issued with a formal warning for misconduct by the JCIO.

The Deputy Chief Magistrate of England and Wales inadvertent ‘liking’ of a post had resulted in a perception of bias. The Lord Chancellor and the Lady Chief Justice were not satisfied that a sanction of formal advice was sufficient in this case as he had caused “significant reputational damage to the judiciary”.

JCIO Disciplinary Statements 2026/2027

• Mr Paul Gibson JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 12/26
• Mrs Jacqueline Caldwell-Barr JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 11/26
• Tribunal Judge Stephen Reeder – JCIO Investigation Statement 10/26
• District Judge Joanne Redmond – JCIO Investigation Statement 09/26
• District Judge Allan Pickup – JCIO Investigation Statement 08/26
• Employment Judge Simon Loy – JCIO Investigation Statement 07/26
• Ms Shanelle Nwanaebi JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 06/26
• Upper Tribunal Judge Jonathan Perkins – JCIO Investigation Statement 05/26
• Tribunal Judge David Roberts – JCIO Investigation Statement 04/26
• Mrs Christine Parry JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 03/26
• Ms Neelam Saddique JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 02/26
• Mrs Adele Rugen JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 01/26
• Miss Louise Hall JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 103/25
• Employment Judge Stephen Shore – JCIO Investigation Statement 102/25
• His Honour Judge Richard Roberts – JCIO Investigation Statement 101/25
• Mr Simon Fawthrop JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 100/25
• Mr Justice Derek Sweeting – JCIO Investigation Statement 99/25
• Mr William Wells JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 98/25
• Mr Benjamin Gravestock JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 97/25

JCIO Disciplinary Statements 2025/2026

• Tribunal Judge Alex Hobbs – JCIO Investigation Statement 96/25
• Mr Alfred Bean JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 95/25
• Mr Robert Waugh JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 94/25
• Ms Rachel Onikosi JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 93/25
• Ms Fiona Williams JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 92/25
• Mr Gurdev Dadral JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 91/25
• Tribunal Judge Mohammed Bashir – JCIO Investigation Statement 90/25
• Ms Jocelyn Harrow JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 89/25
• Mr Kenneth Joe JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 88/25
• Mr Andrew Kerr JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 87/25
• Mr Derek Muhammad JP – JCIO Investigations Statement 85/25
• Mr Nicholas Letherby JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 84/25
• Mr Adrian Kermode JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 83/25
• Mr Morris Suckall JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 82/25
• Employment Judge Richard Nicolle – JCIO Investigation Statement 81/25
• Ms Michelle Bevan-Margetts JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 80/25
• Assistant Coroner Louise Wiltshire – JCIO Investigation Statement 79/25
• Dr Jane Dewar – JCIO Investigation Statement 78/25
• Employment Judge Paul Cadney – JCIO Investigation Statement 77/25
• Mr Lascelles Haughton JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 76/25
• Mr David Whitehead JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 75/25
• District Judge (Magistrates Court) Stephen Leake – JCIO Investigation Statement 74/25
• Mr John Parfitt JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 73/25
• Mrs Roberta Hall JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 72/25
• Mr Steven Kinchington JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 71/25
• Mrs Nicola Walker JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 70/25
• Mrs Rebecca Reeves JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 69/25
• Mr Sarfraz Uddin JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 68/25
• Miss Jennifer Reay JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 67/25
• District Judge Colin Bosman – JCIO Investigation Statement 66/25
• Miss Angela Cahill JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 65/25
• Mr Mark Lenderyou JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 64/25
• Employment Judge Philip Lancaster – JCIO Investigation Statement 63/25
• Recorder David Mason KC – JCIO Investigation Statement 62/25
• Mr Nick Johnston JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 61/25
• Assistant Coroner Hannah Mettam – JCIO Investigation Statement 60/25
• Craig Rydqvist JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 59/25
• Clive Powell JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 58/25
• Evelyn McCann JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 57/25
• Mrs Jill Clarke JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 56/25
• District Judge (Magistrates Court) Leo Pyle – JCIO Investigation Statement 55/25
• Employment Judge Laura Howden-Evans – JCIO Investigation Statement 54/25
• Mrs Madeleine Bonser JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 53/25
• Mrs Jane Taylor JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 52/25
• Dr Anna Duke – JCIO Investigation Statement 51/25
• Ms Susan Kelly JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 50/25
• Ms Kate Waghorn JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 49/25
• Ms Gillian Sebright JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 48/25
• Dr Amy Delicate JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 47/25
• Mr Michael Muldoon JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 46/25
• Mr John Garforth JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 45/25
• Ms Nicola Baldwin JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 44/25
• Mr Andrew Dawson JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 43/25
• Mrs Marisa Austin-Knowles – JCIO Investigation Statement 42/25
• Dr Sujata Chadha – JCIO Investigation Statement 41/25
• Her Honour Judge Fiona Shanks – JCIO Investigation Statement 40/25
• Employment Judge Catrin Lewis – JCIO Investigation Statement 39/25
• Mr Ramesh Nayak JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 38/75
• Recorder Paul Kirtley – JCIO Investigation Statement 37/25
• Mr David Armitage JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 34/25
• Mr Joe Bangudu JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 33/25
• Mrs Angela Bradshaw JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 32/25
• Deputy District Judge Michael Horton KC – JCIO Investigation Statement 31/25
• Miss Linda Hill JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 30/25
• Mr Martin Dominique JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 29/25
• Mrs Shirley Holmes JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 28/25
• Her Honour Judge Martine Kushner – JCIO Investigation Statement 27/25
• Mr Edmund Sutton JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 26/25
• Mr Alfred Bean JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 25/25
• Mr Terry Regan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 24/25
• Mr Peter Chapman JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 23/25
• Mrs Sharanjit Sandhu JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 22/25
• Mrs Fiona Jones JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 21/25
• Ms Amie Canham JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 20/25
• Mr Robert Walker JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 19/25
• Senior Coroner Caroline Sumeray – JCIO Investigation Statement 18/25
• Recorder James Howlett – JCIO Investigation Statement 17/25
• Deputy District Judge Danny Glaser – JCIO Investigation Statement 16/25
• Her Honour Judge Kharin Cox – JCIO Investigation Statement 15/25
• Ms Abiola Onatade JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 14/25
• Mrs Karen Earnshaw JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 13/25
• Mrs Jane Greasley JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 12/25
• District Judge Christopher Falvey – JCIO Investigation Statement 11/25
• Mrs Susanna Craig JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 10/25
• District Judge Christopher Falvey – JCIO Investigation Statement 09/25
• Dr Charles Jumbo JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 08/25
• Non-legal Tribunal Member Mr Mark Harding – JCIO Investigation Statement 07/25
• Mr Anderson Jordan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 06/25
• Mrs Christine Parry JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 05/25
• Mr Andrew York JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 04/25
• Employment Judge Gary Denis Tobin – JCIO Investigation Statement 03/25

JCIO Disciplinary Statements 2024/2025

• Tribunal Judge Jenna McKinney – JCIO Investigation Statement 02/25
• Mr Mark Gray JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 119/24
• Employment Judge Richard Nicolle – JCIO Investigation Statement 118/24
• Reverend Terence Young JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 117/24
• Deputy District Judge James Lewis – JCIO Investigation Statement 116/24
• Deputy District Judge Daniel Dodd – JCIO Investigation Statement 115/24
• Deputy District Judge Emily May Windsor – JCIO Investigation Statement 114/24
• Mr Michael Berry JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 113/24
• Russell Blake JP -JCIO Investigation Statement 112/24
• Mr Graham Curry JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 111/24
• Mr Mohammad Hussain JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 110/24
• Mr Ahmed Azam JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 109/24
• Mrs Justice McGowan DBE – JCIO Investigation Statement 108/24
• Deputy District Judge Toby Hales – JCIO Investigation Statement 107/24
• Mr Adrian Jones JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 105/24
• Mr Martin Dominique JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 104/24
• Mr Richard Giugno JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 103/24
• District Judge Colin Bosman (‘DJ Bosman’) – JCIO Investigation Statement 102/24
• Ms Virginia Claire Jackson JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 101/24
• Mr Abdul Malik JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 100/24
• Employment Judge Liam Varnam (EJ Varnam) – JCIO Investigation Statement 99/24
• Mrs Jane Bailey JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 98/24
• Ms Susan Holcroft JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 97/24
• Miss Panama Jahan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 96/24
• Miss Catherine Burns JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 95/24
• Miss Nina Reinach JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 94/24
• Miss Hilary Whiteway JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 92/24
• Mr Michael Barnes JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 91/24
• Mr Edwin Hastings-Smith JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 90/24
• Ms Justine Dyson JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 89/24
• Mr Kirk Master JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 88/24
• District Judge Alison Griffiths – JCIO Investigation Statement 87/24
• District Judge Franklin Evans – JCIO Investigation Statement 86/24
• District Judge Denise Saunders – JCIO Investigation Statement 85/24
• Dr Andrew Easton – JCIO Investigation Statement 84/24
• Mr Jonathan Dannatt JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 83/24
• Ms Valerie Humphrey JP -JCIO Investigation Statement 82/24
• Mr Daniel Barker JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 81/24
• Mr Joseph Lindo JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 80/24
• Mr Gary Morgan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 79/24
• Mr David Payne JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 78/24
• Nargis Alsadiq JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 77/24
• Tribunal Judge Jonathan Perkins – JCIO Investigation Statement 76/24
• Elizabeth Slamer JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 75/24
• Mr Thomas Rock JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 74/24
• Dr Atul Gandecha JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 73/24
• Employment Judge David Khan – JCIO Investigation Statement 72/24
• Mr Richard Whitehouse – JCIO Investigation Statement 71/24
• District Judge Michael Nicholson – JCIO Investigation Statement 70/24
• District Judge Keeley Bishop – JCIO Investigation Statement 69/24
• Dr Elizabeth Wooffinden – JCIO Investigation Statement 68/24
• Mr Mohammed Najib – JCIO Investigation Statement 67/24
• Miss Fazila Karolia – JCIO Investigation Statement 66/24
• District Judge (Magistrates Court) Stephen Leake – JCIO Investigation Statement 65/24
• Recorder Yvette Genn – JCIO Investigation Statement 64/24
• Recorder Edward Renvoize – JCIO Investigation Statement 63/24
• Mr Phillip Roberts – JCIO Investigation Statement 62/24
• Mr Jeremy Betts JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 61/24
• Tribunal Judge Lynn Griffin – JCIO Investigation Statement 60/24
• Deputy District Judge Sarah Ellis – JCIO Investigation Statement 59/24
• Mr Alistair Borland JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 58/24
• Recorder Simon Bickler – JCIO Statement 57/24
• Mr Keith O’Brien – JCIO Investigation Statement 56/24
• Miss Tessa Smith JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 55/24
• Ms Lynn Killoran JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 54/24
• His Honour Judge Martin Davis – JCIO Investigation Statement 52/24
• Dr Rajay Arora JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 50/24
• Mrs Jean Banford JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 49/24
• Mr Michael Woodhouse JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 48/24
• Dr Simon Ward – JCIO Investigation Statement 47/24
• Senior Coroner Martin Fleming – JCIO Investigation Statement 46/24
• Mrs Jayne Harding JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 45/24
• Mr Manjit Cheema JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 44/24
• Insolvency and Companies Court (ICC) Judge Catherine Burton – JCIO Investigation Statement 43/24
• Assistant Coroner Heath Westerman – JCIO Investigation Statement 42/24
• Mr Justice Marcus Smith – JCIO Investigation Statement 41/24
• Deputy District Judge Dinshaw Printer – JCIO Investigation Statement 40/24
• Mr Timothy Nathan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 38/24
• Mr Jeremy Purkis – JCIO Investigation Statement 37/24
• His Honour Judge Steven Everett – JCIO Investigation Statement 36/24
• Mr Richard Morris JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 35/24
• Deputy District Judge Adrian White – JCIO Investigation Statement 34/24
• Ms Natalia Schiffrin JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 33/24
• Mrs Anne Toomer JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 32/24
• Mr Timothy Vogel JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 31/24
• Mr Charles Peck JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 30/24
• Deputy Senior District Judge Tanweer Ikram – JCIO Investigation Statement 29/24
• Mr Justice Picken – JCIO Investigation Statement 28/24
• Mr Justin Johnson JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 27/24
• Declan Ball JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 26/24
• Recorder Andrew Tidbury – JCIO Investigation Statement 25/24
• Ms Shaistah Zeidan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 24/24
• Mr Andrew Sturgess JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 23/24
• Mrs Ijeoma McDougall JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 22/24
• District Judge Najma Mian – JCIO Investigation Statement 21/24
• Don Wicks JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 20/24
• Mr Nicholas Preston – JCIO Investigation Statement 19/24
• Robert Gonouya JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 18/24
• Mr Justice Francis – JCIO Investigation Statement 17/24

JCIO Disciplinary Statements 2023/2024

• Recorder Simon Myerson – JCIO Investigation Statement 16/24
• Crawford Kingsnorth JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 15/24
• District Judge Stephen Harmes – JCIO Investigation Statement 14/24
• His Honour Judge Nigel Gerald – JCIO Investigation Statement 13/24
• District Judge Melanie Hay – JCIO Investigation Statement 12/24
• His Honour Judge Luba – JCIO Investigation Statement 11/24
• Mr Raymond Wood JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 10/24
• Mr Imtiaz Ahmed JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 09/24
• Mr Karl McLeish JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 08/24
• Mrs Brenda Bruce JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 07/24
• Mr Ben Walker JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 06/24
• Mr Paul Michell – JCIO Investigation Statement 05/24
• Mr Aaron Agboola JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 04/24
• Deputy District Judge Marian Lynch – JCIO Investigation Statement 03/24
• Patrick Weekes JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 02/24
• Mr Justice Edward Murray – JCIO Investigation Statement 01/24
• Mr Kevin McNicholas – JCIO Investigation Statement 41/23
• Laurence Davis JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 40/23
• Sabrina Malik JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 39/23
• Mohammad Usman Khan JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 38/23
• Grant Roberts JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 37/23
• Brian Lawn JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 36/23
• Tribunal Member Dr Malcolm Davies – JCIO Investigation Statement 35/23
• Dr Aaron Borbora JP– JCIO Investigation Statement 34/23
• Stephen Clements JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 33/23
• Mr David Cartwright-Powell – JCIO Investigation Statement 32/23
• Elisabeth Oats JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 31/23
• Lord Justice Clive Lewis – JCIO Investigation Statement 30/23
• Mr Justice Derek Sweeting – JCIO Investigation Statement 29/23
• Dr Christopher Pearson – JCIO Investigation Statement 28/23
• Jennifer Larkin JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 27/23
• Mr Richard Curry JP- JCIO Investigation Statement 25/23
• Judge Martin Brewer – JCIO Investigation Statement 24/23
• Nic Woods JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 23/23
• His Honour Judge Michael Slater – JCIO Investigation Statement 22/23
• Shushil Rai JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 21/23
• Dr John Stevens – JCIO Investigation Statement 20/23
• Jaganmohan Ramachandran JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 19/23
• Deputy District Judge Adam Tear – JCIO Investigation Statement 18/23
• Joanne Varley JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 17/23
• District Judge Sarah Walker – JCIO Investigation Statement 16/23
• Richard Goodwin JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 15/23
• Adrian Tasker JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 14/23
• Dr John Bennett– JCIO Investigation Statement 13/23
• Sasere Obaseki JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 12/23
• Jennifer Denton JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 11/23
• Abigail Buckingham JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 10/23
• Fiona Western JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 09/23
• His Honour Judge Andrew Easteal – JCIO Investigation Statement 08/23
• Mrs Olive Leighton JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 07/23
• Danny Goodchild JP– JCIO Investigation Statement 06/23
• Ken Stammers JP – JCIO Investigation Statement 05/23
• Ansar Hussain JP– JCIO Investigation Statement 04/23
• Jeb Singh JP– JCIO Investigation Statement 03/23
• Yu Tan JP– JCIO Investigation Statement 02/23
• Neale Murphy JP– JCIO Investigation Statement 01/23

JCIO Disciplinary Statements are published by year on the JCIO website

A statement will normally be published when a disciplinary sanction has been issued to a judicial office-holder for misconduct.

The Lord Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor may decide jointly to:

• issue a statement in any case;
• decline to issue a statement in any case;
• delete a statement prior to the expiration of the relevant publication period.

Publication Periods

Statements published before 22 August 2022

Statements about cases which resulted in a sanction below removal from office will be deleted after one year. Statements about cases which resulted in removal from office will be deleted after five years.

Statements published from 22 August 2022

The following publication periods apply to statements published from 22 August 2022. Following the outcome of the 2020-22 review of the disciplinary system, statements now contain more detail. The JCIO privacy notice has been updated to reflect this change.

Sanction Imposed	Publication Period
Formal Advice	Two Years
Formal Warning	Four Years
Reprimand	Six Years
Removal from Office (except for failure to meet minimum sitting requirements)	Indefinite
Removal from Office for failure to meet minimum sitting requirements	Five years

Requesting a Copy of a Deleted Statement

A copy of any statement which has been deleted following expiration of its publication period can be requested by emailing: [email protected]

Requesters must state the name of the office-holder. It will also help to locate statements if requesters give as much information as possible about the nature of the conduct for which the office-holder received a disciplinary sanction, and the year in which they believe the statement was published.

JCIO aims to reply to all requests for deleted statements within 10 working days.

Disciplinary Statements – JCIO

These example only represent a small fraction of judicial misconduct cases in the UK. These cases demonstrate the importance of judicial ethics and the need for accountability within the justice system.

The importance of maintaining high ethical standards in the UK judiciary cannot be overstated, and the consequences that judges may face if they engage in misconduct.

While it is important to hold judges accountable for their actions, instances of judges being dismissed for misconduct are relatively rare.

It is worth noting that the vast majority of judges in the UK are ethical and diligent in carrying out their duties. When instances of misconduct do occur, they are usually dealt with through disciplinary proceedings or other forms of corrective action.

Complain about a judge to the JCIO ?

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) are an independent office which supports the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice in considering complaints about the personal conduct of judicial office holders.

JCIO Complaint

Here is the complaint I made to the JCIO in November 2020 against DDJ Mills (Deputy District Judge Mills) that was unfortunately dismissed.

a) Was “rude and condescending” and spelt out his name M-I-L-L-S, he:
• “Appeared to have superiority complex by the language used”. He spelt out his name in “an incredibly patronising way”.
• Stated, “I suggest you continue your studies in English Law Mr Watts as you appear to know nothing“.

Amnesia ?

DDJ Mills and Miss Eleanor Harriet Battie of 1 Crown Office Reach (1COR) both appear to have suffered from amnesia. Deputy District Judge Chris Mills continues to sit (fee paid) and inflict himself on the public.

Fortunately for both of them the Court failed in its legal duty to record the hearing. How convenient ! Hearings at the Crown Court and at civil and family courts are always recorded.

“Having searched all the BT Meet Me recordings for the 1st of October it is unfortunate that I have to advise you that there must have been a technical glitch on that day and your hearing was not recorded.“

Brighton County and Family Courts Court Clerk and Court Usher manager

“a particular burden on the court and herself, as an officer of the court, to ensure that everyone involved understood clearly what was being said.”

Eleanor Battie Barrister JCIO

This statement is clearly untrue and misleading

“In the UK, barristers are not officers of the court unlike solicitors”.

It is possible that the JCIO misquoted Miss Battie, but as a barrister Eleanor Battie is bound by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) rules and code of conduct. Ms Battie, I believe, had a duty to immediately apologise for misleading the JCIO and to correct the record. I do not believe that this ever happened.

In my opinion, this is shameful behaviour or legal ignorance by the barrister Eleanor Battie and no doubt in breach of the Bar Standards Handbook 4.8

Check out the articles on Judges Salaries and Fees, Lady Chief Justice, Mr Justice Williams, His Honour Now His Dishonour, His Honour Judge Michael Slater, His Honour Judge Martin Davis, His Honour Judge Guy Kearl, Can you Criticise a Judge, Can you Email a Judge ? and the highly dubious Sussex Family Justice Board.

His Honour Judge Melbourne Inman KC on X !

Fair dealing for criticism, review or quotation is allowed for any type of copyright work. All sources acknowledged. Article updated 16th April 2025 to update latest JCIO Disciplinary Statements.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

• 
  What is Two Tier Policing ?
  The BBC describes so-called “two-tier policing” as where right-wing protests… Read more: What is Two Tier Policing ?
• 
  Lawful Use of Handcuffs by the Police
  Handcuffs are a standard restraint tool used by police officers… Read more: Lawful Use of Handcuffs by the Police
• 
  His Honour Judge Nicholas Rowland
  Judge Nicholas Edward Rowland, known as His Honour Judge Nicholas… Read more: His Honour Judge Nicholas Rowland
• 
  Police Barred and Advisory Lists
  The police barred and advisory lists, which are managed by… Read more: Police Barred and Advisory Lists
• 
  President of the Family Division
  The President of the Family Division is a highly esteemed… Read more: President of the Family Division
• 
  Is Crimestoppers Anonymous ?
  Crimestoppers is widely promoted as the United Kingdom’s leading provider… Read more: Is Crimestoppers Anonymous ?
• 
  What is a Court Legal Adviser ?
  In magistrates’ courts across England and Wales, lay justices (magistrates… Read more: What is a Court Legal Adviser ?
• 
  What is a Skeleton Argument ?
  A skeleton argument is a concise written document prepared by… Read more: What is a Skeleton Argument ?
• 
  Can you Buy a Judge ?
  His Honour Judge Martin John Cook was for sale, in… Read more: Can you Buy a Judge ?
• 
  Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Dodgy Fire Sticks
  Norwich Pharmacal orders (NPOs) are a form of court-ordered disclosure… Read more: Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Dodgy Fire Sticks
• 
  What is a Statutory Instrument ?
  A statutory instrument is the most common form of secondary… Read more: What is a Statutory Instrument ?
• 
  The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013
  In October 2013, the Treasury laid before Parliament a short… Read more: The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

The Guide to Judicial Conduct – Revised July 2023, published by the judiciary, is intended to assist judges, tribunal members, coroners and magistrates, in relation to their conduct.

The Guide to Judicial Conduct, amongst other things, states that judicial office holders are expected to display diligence and care in the discharge of judicial duties.

The Guidance is based on the principle that responsibility for deciding whether or not a particular activity or course of conduct is appropriate rests with each individual judicial office holder.

The Guide is therefore not a code, nor does it contain rules other than where clearly stated. It contains a set of core principles which will help judicial office holders reach their own decisions.

In January 2023, the Lady Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals asked the Judicial HR committee, who are the representative body for the entire judiciary, to revise the Guide again to reflect changes in wider aspects of judicial and public life.

UK Supreme Court Guide to Judicial Conduct

The United Kingdom Supreme Court published a Guide to Judicial Conduct (2019).

Every court should have a Code of Judicial Conduct that sets out the standards of ethical conduct to be expected of the Court. Such a Code serves a number of purposes. It provides guidance to the members of the Court. It informs those who use the Court of the standards that they can reasonably expect of its judges. It explains to members of the public how judges behave and should help to secure their respect and support for the judiciary.

 Rt Hon. the Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Guide to Judicial Conduct

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council have also published a Guide to Judicial Conduct (2019).

Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) is responsible for investigating complaints about the personal conduct of judges, as well as their professional conduct. It has the power to investigate complaints made by members of the public, legal professionals, and other judges.

The JCIO’s investigations are carried out by a team of investigators who are independent of the judiciary.

Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) Disciplinary Statements

You can check if a a judge has had any disciplinary action against them as Disciplinary statements are published on the JCIO website and are sorted by year.

The JCIO publication policy states that a statement will normally be published when a disciplinary sanction has been issued to a judicial office-holder for misconduct.

The Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor may decide jointly to:

• issue a statement in any case;
• decline to issue a statement in any case;
• delete a statement prior to the expiration of the relevant publication period.

Misconduct by Senior Judiciary

These people are expected to be addressed as “Your Honour”! In a real business they would have been fired ! Can you Criticise a Judge ?

Recorder Simon Myerson

“The Lady Chief Justice, with the Lord Chancellor’s agreement, has issued Recorder Simon Myerson with formal advice for misconduct after he posted inappropriately on Twitter (now known as X).”

His Honour Judge Nigel Gerald

“The Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor agreed with the nominated judge that HHJ Gerald’s actions fell short of the standards expected of a judge and that his actions amounted to judicial misconduct.”

His Honour Judge Jan Luba

“The Lady Chief Justice, with the Lord Chancellor’s agreement, has issued His Honour Judge (HHJ) Jan Luba with formal advice for misconduct.”

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession, police or any other law enforcement agencies.

Latest Articles ↓

• 
  What is Two Tier Policing ?
  The BBC describes so-called “two-tier policing” as where right-wing protests… Read more: What is Two Tier Policing ?
• 
  Lawful Use of Handcuffs by the Police
  Handcuffs are a standard restraint tool used by police officers… Read more: Lawful Use of Handcuffs by the Police
• 
  His Honour Judge Nicholas Rowland
  Judge Nicholas Edward Rowland, known as His Honour Judge Nicholas… Read more: His Honour Judge Nicholas Rowland
• 
  Police Barred and Advisory Lists
  The police barred and advisory lists, which are managed by… Read more: Police Barred and Advisory Lists
• 
  President of the Family Division
  The President of the Family Division is a highly esteemed… Read more: President of the Family Division
• 
  Is Crimestoppers Anonymous ?
  Crimestoppers is widely promoted as the United Kingdom’s leading provider… Read more: Is Crimestoppers Anonymous ?
• 
  What is a Court Legal Adviser ?
  In magistrates’ courts across England and Wales, lay justices (magistrates… Read more: What is a Court Legal Adviser ?
• 
  What is a Skeleton Argument ?
  A skeleton argument is a concise written document prepared by… Read more: What is a Skeleton Argument ?
• 
  Can you Buy a Judge ?
  His Honour Judge Martin John Cook was for sale, in… Read more: Can you Buy a Judge ?
• 
  Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Dodgy Fire Sticks
  Norwich Pharmacal orders (NPOs) are a form of court-ordered disclosure… Read more: Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Dodgy Fire Sticks
• 
  What is a Statutory Instrument ?
  A statutory instrument is the most common form of secondary… Read more: What is a Statutory Instrument ?
• 
  The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013
  In October 2013, the Treasury laid before Parliament a short… Read more: The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013

Most Popular ↓

You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.