Categories
Policing

Sussex Police

Sussex Police serves East and West Sussex and the city of Brighton & Hove which is an area of about 3,780km. A resident population of 1.65m people grows significantly with millions of visitors, holidaymakers, students, seasonal workers and the 46 million passengers who travel annually through Gatwick Airport.

Sussex Police PEEL Assessment – PEEL 2021/22 13 April 2023

‘Thank you for the clarity and for outlining the circumstances which I am frankly mortified about and offer my sincere apologies. I am also very disappointed in those who have let you down and I have asked for that/them to be addressed.’

Jo Shiner Chief Constable Sussex Police

Must Read ! Sussex Police, the King and High Sheriff

Former Sussex Police investigator pleads guilty to misconduct in public office
“The public expects police staff and investigators to act with integrity at all times. This case shows that abuse of position will not be tolerated.” Misconduct in Public Office

Sussex Police officer has been charged with sexually assault
PC Ryan Busby a Sussex Police officer has been charged with sexually assaulting four women. Sussex Police says he has been suspended from duty.

Is this Justice? Sussex Cops Cleared For Tasering A Disabled 92 Year Old
Sussex Police Two Tier Policing

Sussex Police needs to improve staff vetting
His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) report stated there was a “huge backlog of vetting” and that some employees were working in a job “without the proper level of clearance”.

Sussex Police officers not guilty of assault on 92-year-old amputee
Sussex Police Assistant Chief Constable Paul Court said that the officers would still face gross misconduct proceedings.

Sussex Police Pc Rachel Comotto only fired her Taser at a 92-year-old amputee to protect him from being struck again with a baton by her colleague, court heard.

Sussex Police PCs laughed about spray use on man, 92, jury hears

Sussex PC Tasered amputee, 92, in wheelchair, court hears

I have reported a stalker on several occasions to Sussex Police. Strangely have refused to record this as a crime or explain themselves.

Sussex Police (Sussex Police Constable Vinh Tran EB131 or was it Sussex Police Sergeant James Poll EA193) refuse to record an allegation of stalking as a crime….hardly policing without fear of favour. Check out National Stalking Awareness Week – Sussex Police and Police Professional Standards Department (PSD)

123K Views
Sussex Police visit the Ministry of Injustice – IP Address 213.106.88.230

Sussex Police Female PC who groped colleagues and told one ‘I bet you’re a big boy’ on work night out is banned from policing

Sussex Police post recruitment campaign on Facebook featuring plastic police !

Sussex Police won’t help unfortunately they said not their issue ?

Ex Sussex Police PC jailed over driving offences fraud
Seren Sriganesh a former Sussex police officer has been jailed after falsely claiming his parents had committed his three driving offences. He also unlawfully accessed police systems to view details of one of the offences.

Sussex Police PC found not guilty of corruption. “Now the criminal investigation has concluded, the force will progress internal misconduct proceedings,” Sussex Police said.

Sussex Police officer attacked woman in alley, court told
A court has heard that a former Sussex Police inspector pinned a woman to a wall in an alleyway and sexually assaulted her. He denies the charge of sexual assault by penetration.

Sussex Police blasted for ‘weird’ Valentines stunt
Sussex Police has raised eyebrows with their latest valentines publicity stunt, setting up a romantic dinner table complete with rose petals. “The police spend far too little time trying to catch criminals and solving crimes”

Unhinged’ Sussex PC crashed into e-bike
It is alleged Sussex Police PC Tim Bradshaw drove his police car at an e-bike causing serious injury by dangerous driving. “There’s a difference between protecting and serving our community and being unhinged”

Sussex armed police swoop on boys playing with toy Nerf guns
Sussex Armed Police yelled at Two boys aged 12 and 13 to get on the ground and put down their ‘weapons’. Sussex Police only realised the nerf guns were toys when they shot the foam bullets for themselves.

Three police forces called in to probe Allison Pearson tweet “Sussex Police, which marked it as a possible non-crime hate incident (NCHI) as well as a potential malicious communication”

Sussex Police turning a blind eye ?

Sussex Police and South Yorkshire Police have both been issued with enforcement notices by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for their “continued failings” to meet their obligations under the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act, with the latter’s request response rate being classed as “unacceptable on any level”.

ICO takes regulatory action against two forces for failings under the FoI Act

For the latest Sussex Police news please see out Police News pages.

Sussex Police officers, staff and volunteers work together to deliver the strategic priorities set within the Sussex Police and Crime Plan and the Sussex Police priorities which are as follows :-

  • Protect our communities.
  • Catch criminals.
  • Deliver an outstanding service.

If you have arrived at the Ministry of Injustice from sussexpolice.uk or sussex-police.uk (MOI domains) you may well have been looking for sussex.police.uk which is the official website for Sussex Police.

For the avoidance of doubt this website is not run by Sussex Police nor is it associated in any way with Sussex Police.

Call 999 if:

  • a serious offence is in progress or has just been committed
  • someone is in immediate danger or harm
  • property is in danger of being damaged
  • a serious disruption to the public is likely

Call 101 for non-emergency enquiries. You can also Report a Crime online.

You may be interested in our articles Chief Constable Jo Shiner Sussex Police, What is a Police and Crime Commissioner and a Police and Crime Panel ?, Two Tier Policing, It’s the Law, What is Policing by Consent ?, Wasting Police Time, Met Police, West Midlands Police and the State of Policing Report 2022 and the Loss of Public Trust.

Sussex Cop refuses to stop crime

Sussex Police make national headlines again :-

Fury at Sussex Police as PCSO sat in marked car is filmed REFUSING to attend an assault at a Co-op just 200 yards away because then he’ll ‘have to deal with it’

‘There’s a member of the public that’s just been assaulted by a 15-year-old girl who’s drunk, had a drink thrown in her face, got punched.

‘People have called the police, we’ve come round here and you’re sitting here.’

Daily Mail

A Sussex Police Community Support Officer (PCSO) was shown refusing to respond to an alleged assault in a supermarket, in a video posted on TikTok.

The video shows a man telling the officer about a fight in the Co-op store in Lancing which had been reported to the police.

The PCSO said: “I’m not a response unit.”

Sussex Police said it had launched an investigation.

The man who was filmed in conversation with the PCSO said members of the public were trying to stop a shoplifter.

He said to the PCSO: “You need to get round to the Co-op. There’s just been a fight round there, because people are trying to stop the shoplifter that you’re doing nothing about.”

He said: “People have called the police and you’re sitting here.”

The officer responded: “I’m not a response unit unfortunately.”

The man said the sight of the police car would “make them scatter”.

The officer replied: “Yeah, but then I have to deal with it.”

“That’s why I’m here and not round there.”

In a statement, Sussex Police said: “We are aware of video footage of a single-crewed Police Community Support Officer being approached by a member of the public to report an incident in Lancing.

“The matter was reported to us and a police officer attended the incident as an emergency. The PCSO also then attended the scene.”

Supt Nick Dias said: “We are sorry for the clumsy language used by the PCSO in this exchange and acknowledge the public’s concern. A police unit was dispatched to the scene as a matter of priority. Our response to this incident is being reviewed.”

Katy Bourne, Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner, said she shared “the public’s disappointment and understandable concern” with the video.

“A member of the public sent me the video and I immediately shared it with the Chief Constable who referred the incident to the Sussex professional standards department.”

She added: “This is not the sort of response that I would expect and the public deserve.”

Sussex PCSO filmed refusing to attend assault at shop – BBC News

Footage has captured the moment a driver berates a PCSO for failing to intervene during a shop brawl as he blasts the officer for “cowardice”.

Sussex PCSO refuses to intervene – LBC

Concerns about Sussex Police’s performance

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) published a PEEL inspection of Sussex Police on the 13th April 2023.

The report PEEL 2021/22 – An inspection of Sussex Police graded Sussex Police’s performance across nine areas of policing and found the force was ‘good’ in two areas, ‘adequate’ in four areas, ‘requires improvement’ in one area, and ‘inadequate’ in two areas.

Sussex Police urgently needs to improve how it responds to the public, and how it records crime.

Its recording of reports of violent crime is inadequate, and the force is also missing opportunities to safeguard vulnerable people. It needs to improve the way it assesses initial calls to the force so that vulnerable people and repeat callers are routinely identified.

As a result of my concerns I have already been in contact with the chief constable and the police and crime commissioner.

I am pleased with the way the force has responded so far and I will continue to check the force’s progress in addressing areas for improvement in the coming months.

His Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary – Roy Wilsher

Sussex Police unlawfully captured personal data

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued a reprimand to both Surrey Police and Sussex Police, following the rollout of an app that recorded phone conversations and unlawfully captured personal data. The ICO applied its revised public sector approach instead of issuing a £1m fine to both Surrey Police and Sussex Police.

Sussex Police and Surrey Police failed to use people’s personal data lawfully by recording hundreds of thousands of phone calls without their knowledge. People have the right to expect that when they speak to a police officer, the information they disclose is handled responsibly. We can only estimate the huge amount of personal data collected during these conversations, including highly sensitive information relating to suspected crimes.

The reprimand reflects the use of the ICO’s wider powers towards the public sector as large fines could lead to reduced budgets for the provision of vital services. This case highlights why the ICO is pursuing a different approach, as fining Surrey Police and Sussex Police risks impacting the victims of crime in the area once again.

This case should be a lesson learned to any organisation planning to introduce an app, product or service that uses people’s personal data. Organisations must consider people’s data protection rights and implement data protection principles from the very start.

Stephen Bonner, ICO Deputy Commissioner – Regulatory Supervision

There is an expectation that the Police should uphold the law and act lawfully at all times.

Sussex Police- Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC)

The IOPC publish investigations, news releases and anonymised summaries and recommendations about Sussex Police on their website.

Sussex Police defend Transgender Paedophile ?

Sussex Police sparks fury after defending transgender paedophile who sexually abused seven children saying it will not ‘tolerate hateful comments about gender’

Sussex Police do not tolerate any hateful comments towards their gender identity regardless of crimes committed. This is irrelevant to the crime that has been committed and investigated.

Sussex Police Twitter 27th September 2022
Sussex Police Apology

SUSSEX Police had been condemned by the Home Secretary, at the time, Suella Braverman for “playing identity politics and denying biology”.

Suella Braverman KC said Sussex Police should ‘focus on catching criminals not policing pronouns’ Source: Evening Standard

Home Secretary criticises Sussex force for ‘policing pronouns’ Source BBC

Home Secretary’s Comment About Sussex Police
Sussex Police Twitter Account

Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner Priorities

“As your PCC, my job is to hold the Chief Constable of Sussex Police to account and ensure that the police focus on local priorities. I believe every citizen has a right to feel safe on the streets and in their homes.

“In consultation with the Chief Constable and the people of Sussex, I have published a Police & Crime Plan setting out the priorities and local objectives that local people and business say are important to them.

With your support, I am determined that Sussex Police will operate effectively and efficiently and that the values I have embraced during my professional career – hard work, integrity and fairness – underpin everything we do together.”

Police typically are responsible for maintaining public order and safety, enforcing the law, and preventing, detecting, and investigating criminal activities.

Sussex Police should concentrate on doing the job that they are paid to do. No wonder the public have no faith in the Police !

Source Daily Mail

Sussex Police Notable News

Check out our articles on Policing, Police News, Policing by Consent, Two Tiered Policing, Thought Police, Wasting Police Time, What is a Police and Crime Commissioner ?, Police Community Support Officers (PCSO), Professional Standards Department, Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), Police Public Confidence and Engagement, Met Police, Chief Constable Jo Shiner, R v Sussex Justices and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

Latest Tweets from Sussex Police

Sussex Police on X

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Judiciary Legal Analysis

Can you Criticise a Judge ?

In short, the answer is yes anyone can criticise a judge or court.

The judiciary and courts are quite rightly not immune to public criticism and comment. The rule of law applies to everyone and no one should be above the law.

Scandalising the judiciary, also known as scandalising the court or scandalising judges, was historically considered a form of contempt of court in the common law of England and Wales.

It involved any publication or speech that would undermine public confidence in the judiciary or its officers, such as judges and magistrates.

However, the Crime and Courts Act 2013 abolished the offence of scandalising the judiciary under the common law of England and Wales.

Section 33 of the Act specifically states

“Scandalising the judiciary (also referred to as scandalising the court or scandalising judges) is abolished as a form of contempt of court under the common law of England and Wales.”

Crime and Courts Act 2013 Section 33

The decision to abolish the offence was controversial, with supporters of the change arguing that it was necessary to ensure that freedom of expression was protected and that the judiciary were not immune to criticism.

While the offence of scandalising the judiciary no longer exists under the common law of England and Wales, other forms of contempt of court still apply.

These include disobedience to court orders, interference with court proceedings, and publication of material that could prejudice ongoing legal proceedings.

In conclusion, scandalising the judiciary was once considered a form of contempt of court in England and Wales, but this offence was abolished by the Crime and Courts Act 2013.

It should however be noted that libel and slander are both forms of defamation, which involve making a false statement about someone that damages their reputation.

In the United Kingdom, the laws around libel and slander are governed by the Defamation Act 2013, which replaced the previous common law rules on defamation.

Formal complaints about judges can be made at the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO).

The JCIO are an independent office which supports the Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice in considering complaints about the personal conduct of judicial office holders.

The JCIO cannot accept complaints about a judge’s decision or the way a judge has managed a case.

The Law Commission published a consultation paper (no207) in 2012 entitled Contempt of Court : Scandalising the Court

Check out our articles on Can you Email a Judge ?, His Honour Judge Melbourne Inman KC, His Honour Judge Jeremy Richardson KC, HHJ Farquhar, HHJ Bedford, Dodgy Judges, Do you Have to Bow to a Judge ?, Etiquette and Manners in Court and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Legal Analysis

What is Unlawful ?

In the realm of law and order, the term “unlawful” denotes actions or behaviours that run counter to established laws, regulations, or ethical standards within a given society.

It serves as a fundamental concept in delineating the boundaries of acceptable conduct, guiding individuals, institutions, and authorities in upholding justice and social order. Understanding what constitutes unlawfulness is pivotal for fostering fairness, equity, and respect for the rule of law.

At its essence, unlawfulness encompasses actions prohibited by law. These can range from minor infractions like speeding to more serious offences such as theft, assault, or homicide.

The severity of unlawfulness varies depending on the nature and impact of the transgression, with legal systems categorising offences into different degrees of seriousness, each carrying its own set of penalties and repercussions.

Central to determining unlawfulness is the existence of legal statutes or regulations that explicitly outline prohibited actions and stipulate the corresponding consequences for violating them. These laws are established through legislative processes by governing bodies, reflecting societal norms, values, and priorities.

Additionally, legal principles such as precedent, common law, and judicial interpretation play a vital role in elucidating the scope and application of these laws in specific cases.

Beyond statutory laws, unlawfulness can also arise from breaches of contractual agreements, where parties fail to fulfil their obligations or engage in actions contrary to the terms of their agreements.

Contractual unlawfulness is governed by contract law, which provides mechanisms for resolving disputes arising from such breaches, including compensation, restitution, or specific performance.

Furthermore, unlawfulness extends beyond legal statutes to encompass actions that contravene fundamental principles of morality, decency, or human rights. These may include acts of discrimination, harassment, or abuse that undermine the dignity, equality, or well-being of individuals or groups within society. While not always codified in legal statutes, such behaviours may still be subject to legal scrutiny and condemnation, particularly in jurisdictions with robust human rights legislation or constitutional protections.

The concept of unlawfulness is closely intertwined with notions of justice, fairness, and accountability. A cornerstone of the rule of law is the equal application of legal standards to all individuals, ensuring that no one is exempt from legal accountability.

Upholding unlawfulness through impartial enforcement of laws and regulations is essential for fostering trust in legal institutions and promoting social cohesion.

However, it’s important to acknowledge that perceptions of unlawfulness may vary across different cultures, societies, and historical contexts. What is deemed unlawful in one jurisdiction may be deemed acceptable or even sanctioned in another, reflecting diverse legal traditions, values, and priorities. Moreover, as societal norms evolve and legal frameworks adapt, definitions of unlawfulness are subject to change over time to address emerging challenges and meet evolving needs.

In conclusion, unlawfulness encompasses actions or behaviours that contravene established laws, regulations, or ethical standards within a given society. It serves as a guiding principle in maintaining order, justice, and social harmony, and upholding the principles of fairness, accountability, and the rule of law is crucial for fostering trust in legal institutions and promoting a just and equitable society.

Check out our articles on Rule of Law, Open Justice, Policing, Police News, Policing by Consent, Wasting Police Time and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law Policing

Auditing Britain

Auditing Britain is a popular YouTube channel that had 312K subscribers and 720 videos (As of 28th Jan 2025).

Auditors such as Auditing Britain, it is said, use “security concerns surrounding the filming of staff and premises, alongside limited powers to prevent it…..They are also well-versed in their own rights and often cite legislation in their interactions with staff.”

What is the Identity of Auditing Britain ?

The iWiki website assumes the identity of Auditing Britain – “Auditing Britain is the pseudonym of a popular YouTuber, whose name is assumed to be Reda Bouadi-Clifton

Reda Bouadi-Clifton was convicted of filming in a court in 2022.

In a version of the Britain Times webpage from 2023 archived on the Internet Archive Wayback Machine “According to a Facebook post, Auditing Britain’s real name is Reda Bouadi-Clifton.”

The Britain Times website now states “Auditing Britain’s real name is Ben****”.

Subscribe and Follow Auditing Britain

Make sure to subscribe to the Auditing Britain YouTube channel.

Auditing Britain is also on Facebook and Instagram.

One of Auditing Britain‘s most popular audits, with 1.3 Million views, was of Hampshire Police who were powerless to stop him.

Auditing Britain – Hampshire Constabulary Powerless

A petition was raised on the UK Government and Parliament Petitions website “Stop Auditing full stop” but was rejected.

Latest Auditing Britain YouTube Videos

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law

Fraud and the Justice System

Fraud is a criminal offence in the UK and can result in serious penalties. The relevant legislation in the UK is the Fraud Act 2006.

Under this Act, it is an offense to dishonestly make a false representation with the intention of causing a gain or loss. This could include making a false statement or providing false documents in order to obtain a court order.

Fraud is the act of gaining a dishonest advantage, often financial, over another person. It is now the most commonly experienced crime in England and Wales, with an estimated 3.4 million incidents in the year ending March 2017.

More than half of these were cyber-related and the number of fraud and forgery cases dealt with by the CPS has risen by almost a third since 2011.

Fraud and economic crime – Crown Prosecution Service

A future MOI article will examine alleged “fraud and organised crime” in the justice system and legal profession.

Justice Select Committee Report

In February 2022, the Justice Committee began examining the ability of the Justice System to effectively prosecute fraud cases.

The Committee was particularly interested in how the system is set up to tackle lower-level frauds, that are often not serious enough to be considered by the Serious Fraud Office but have a significant impact on the public.

They committee also sort to understand the plans that the Government and bodies working in the Justice System had to tackle rising instances of fraud.

The Justice select committee published a full report Fraud and the Justice System on the 18th October 2022.

  • UK justice system ‘ill-equipped’ for rise in fraud
  • Action Fraud ‘unfit for purpose’ as number of victims rises 25% in two years
  • Only 2% of police funding was dedicated to combating fraud despite it accounting for 40% of reported crime
  • The Office for National Statistics disclosed last month that the number of people falling victim to fraud had risen by 25% in the past two years, with 4.5m offences in a 12-month period
  • The committee chair Sir Bob Neill, said fraud was expected to increase, but that the justice system had not reacted to the change. “People are losing their life savings and suffering lasting emotional and psychological harm,” he said. “But the level of concern from law enforcement falls short of what is required.
  • “Fraud prevention, investigation and prosecution too often has seemed like an afterthought, last in the queue for resources, monitoring and even court time. We need the criminal justice system to have the resources and focus to be able to adapt to new technologies and emerging trends.”
UK justice system ‘ill-equipped’ for rise in fraud, say MPs – The Guardian

HMICFRS Fraud Inspection

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) published A review of ‘Fraud: Time to choose’

In 2018, the Home Secretary commissioned Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) to carry out a thematic inspection of fraud.

We conducted our inspection between March and July 2018. In April 2019, we published Fraud: Time to choose – An inspection of the police response to fraud. In that report, we made 16 recommendations and identified 5 areas for improvement (AFIs).

We have revisited our previous inspection to see how the police service has responded to the recommendations and AFIs we made in that report. This report presents our findings on the progress that has been made.

A review of ‘Fraud: Time to choose’ – HMICFRS

Fraud Strategy

The government published a policy paper Fraud Strategy on the 3rd May 2023 which sets out a plan to reduce fraud by 10% on 2019 levels by December 2024.

#SFJB – Fraud at the Sussex Family Justice Board ?

National Lead Force

The City of London Police are the National Police Chiefs’ Council Lead for Economic and Cyber Crime and National Lead Force for Fraud. They operate Action Fraud and the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau.

Working with City of London Police and local forces is the National Economic Crime Centre (NECC), which sits within the National Crime Agency (NCA).

We investigate some of the country’s most complex cases of fraud, set the national strategy and coordinate the operational response. We also host Action Fraud, the national reporting centre for fraud and cybercrime, on behalf of policing.

With over 40 per cent of all crime reported in the UK being fraud related, the National Lead Force (NLF), as part of the City of London Police, serves a crucial role in the coordination of the policing response: identifying, disrupting and prosecuting fraud and economic crime across the country.

National Lead Force – City of London Police

If you have arrived at the Ministry of Injustice from https://cityoflondonpolice.uk (a MOI domain) you may well have been looking for https://cityoflondon.police.uk which is the official website for City of London Police.

For the avoidance of doubt this website is not run by City of London Police nor is it associated in any way with City of London Police.

Call 999 if:

  • a serious offence is in progress or has just been committed
  • someone is in immediate danger or harm
  • property is in danger of being damaged
  • a serious disruption to the public is likely

Call 101 for non-emergency enquiries. You can also Report a Crime online.

Check out our articles on Policing, Police News, Policing by Consent, Two Tiered Policing, Wasting Police Time, Met Police, Sussex Police, Chief Constable Jo Shiner Sussex Police, What is a Police and Crime Commissioner and a Police and Crime Panel ? and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Rogues

Sussex.com

Harry and Meghan’s ‘provocative’ new Sussex.com website ‘is a betrayal of their agreement with the late Queen’

THE OFFICE OF PRINCE HARRY & MEGHAN THE DUKE & DUCHESS OF SUSSEX

The Duke of Sussex is fifth in line to the throne and the younger son of The King and Diana, Princess of Wales.

The Duchess of Sussex, born Rachel Meghan Markle, married Prince Harry at St George’s Chapel, Windsor in May 2018. The Duke and Duchess have two children, Prince Archie of Sussex and Princess Lilibet of Sussex. 

The couple’s ‘provocative’ decision to relaunch their homepage as ‘Sussex.com’ sparked accusations they are trying to be ‘more Royal’.

Well-placed sources said the new online venture would provide a ‘big challenge’ for Buckingham Palace‘s Lord Chamberlain.

The growing row centres around the Duke and Duchess’s decision to replace their Archewell website – the umbrella name for all their philanthropic and business endeavours – with ‘Sussex.com’.

Daily Mail – Sussex.com
Lady C – The people of Sussex need protection against Harry & Meghan’s snatch!

Check out our articles on Sussex Police, Chief Constable Jo Shiner Sussex Police, R v Sussex Justices, Royal Sussex County Hospital, HHJ Farquhar, HHJ Bedford and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

Read the reviews of Junior Sussex Barrister Gavin Howe and Legal 500 Junior Barrister Eleanor Battie

“He is awful, underhanded and should not be practising law!”

She is a one-woman legal A Team”

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Legal Analysis

Injustice in the Single Justice Procedure ?

HM Courts and Tribunal Service have published a Fact sheet entitled Single Justice Service on their website. The Fact Sheet is worryingly described as “Promotional material“.

The Single Justice Service (SJS) allows magistrates’ courts to deal with minor offences in a way that’s quicker, more straightforward and more efficient, while still being fair, transparent and rigorous. This process is known as the Single Justice Procedure (SJP).

A single magistrate, supported by a legal adviser, can decide adult, summary-only, non-imprisonable and victimless offences, including company prosecutions.

They can do this when the defendant has pleaded guilty or has not responded to notification that they’re being prosecuted.

The defendant always has the option to choose to attend a hearing in court in person.

Examples of cases covered by the SJP include:

  • using a television without a licence
  • failing to show a valid train ticket while travelling on a train service
  • driving without car insurance
  • exceeding a speed limit
  • failing to ensure a dependent child’s school attendance
  • excess vehicle load
  • lack of valid vehicle operator’s licence

Is the Single Justice Service (SJS) quicker, more straightforward and more efficient, while still being fair, transparent and rigorous ?

Justice or Injustice

Tristan Kirk who is the Courts correspondent for the Evening Standard regularly posts on X about dubious and immoral convictions using the Single Justice Procedure.

Bristol woman, 57, prosecuted for not paying for a TV Licence
“I have no family or friends…my only lifeline is a TV”
Disabled, & depressed after her daughter’s death. Struggles with opening letters. #SingleJusticeProcedure

Tristan Kirk on X
Tristan Kirk Courts correspondent for the Evening Standard

This is an absolute disgrace.

The Single Justice Procedure is clearly not justice !

pjm1kbw KC Barrister at 1KBW
Injustice in the Single Justice Procedure

Lady Chief Justice to look into flaws of controversial fast-track justice system

Tristan Kirk wrote in the Standard on the 8th February 2024 :-

The top judge in England and Wales has promised to investigate the workings of a controversial fast-track court system after an Evening Standard investigation revealed how the elderly, vulnerable and mentally ill people are convicted in closed-door hearings.

The Lady Chief Justice, Lady Carr of Walton-on-the Hill, backed the single justice procedure when questioned on the fairness of the system, calling it “proportionate” for low-level crimes.

“I think the safeguards are there, both in terms of open justice and protection for the individual involved.”

Lady Carr said she would look into how mentally ill defendants are supported in the procedure, and vowed to inspect how decisions are taken at private hearings. She even suggested she may sit in judgment on SJP cases.

Top judge to look into flaws of controversial fast-track justice system

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Legal Analysis

What is Injustice ?

Injustice is a pervasive and complex concept that transcends geographical, cultural, and temporal boundaries, manifesting in various forms that deeply impact individuals and communities.

At its core, injustice refers to the violation of principles of fairness, equity, and moral rightness within social, political, economic, and legal contexts. The intricate nature of injustice makes it challenging to encapsulate in a singular definition, as its manifestations evolve and adapt to the dynamics of society.

One fundamental aspect of injustice lies in the unequal distribution of resources and opportunities.

Economic injustice, for instance, is evident when certain groups or individuals face systemic barriers preventing them from accessing basic needs, education, or employment opportunities. This form of inequality perpetuates cycles of poverty and limits the upward mobility of marginalised communities, creating a stark contrast between the privileged and the disenfranchised.

Social injustice encompasses discrimination based on race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or other defining characteristics. Prejudice and bias embedded within societal structures lead to unequal treatment, limiting the rights and opportunities available to certain groups. Discriminatory practices can manifest in subtle ways, such as microaggressions, or in more overt forms like systemic racism, reinforcing power imbalances and perpetuating stereotypes that fuel inequality.

Within the legal system, injustice emerges when the application of laws and regulations favours particular groups while disadvantaging others. Legal injustices can range from biased law enforcement practices to discriminatory sentencing, ultimately eroding trust in the judicial system. In some instances, unjust laws themselves may exist, further marginalising specific communities and impeding progress toward a more equitable society.

Political injustice often stems from the abuse of power, corruption, and the suppression of dissent. When leaders prioritize personal gain over the welfare of their constituents, democratic principles are undermined, leading to a lack of representation and accountability. Authoritarian regimes, censorship, and voter suppression are among the myriad ways political injustice can manifest, stifling the voices of those who seek a fair and inclusive governance structure.

Injustice is not solely confined to a macroscopic level; it permeates interpersonal relationships as well.

In everyday life, individuals may experience injustice through bullying, harassment, or exclusion based on personal characteristics. The repercussions of such injustices extend beyond immediate harm, contributing to the perpetuation of harmful social norms and attitudes.

Efforts to combat injustice require a comprehensive approach that addresses its multifaceted nature. Education and awareness play crucial roles in dismantling stereotypes and challenging ingrained biases.

Legal and policy reforms are essential to ensure the fair treatment of all individuals, regardless of their background. Grassroots movements and advocacy are powerful tools for challenging systemic injustices, fostering a collective commitment to building a more equitable and inclusive society.

In conclusion, injustice is a complex and pervasive phenomenon that manifests in various forms across societal structures. It encompasses economic, social, legal, and political dimensions, as well as interpersonal relationships.

Understanding the intricacies of injustice is essential for fostering meaningful change, as it empowers individuals and communities to challenge systemic inequalities and work towards a more just and equitable world.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law

What is the Justice Committee ?

The Justice Committee is a cross-party group of MPs appointed by the House of Commons to examine the policies and spending of the Ministry of Justice and associated public bodies.

This includes the courts, legal aid, prisons, probation and the rule of law. It also advises on sentencing guidelines. The Justice Committee is chaired by Andy Slaughter.

Role of the Justice Committee

Sir Bob Neill MP, former Chair of the Justice Committee, explained the role of the Justice Committee and how to get involved in the Committee’s work

The Justice Committee was appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Ministry of Justice and associated public bodies, (to include the work of staff provided for the administrative work of courts and tribunals, but excluding consideration of individual cases and appointments, and excluding the work of the Scotland and Wales Offices and of the Advocate General for Scotland); and administration and expenditure of the Attorney General’s Office, the Treasury Solicitor’s Department, the Crown Prosecution Service and the Serious Fraud Office (but excluding individual cases and appointments and advice given within government by Law Officers).

The Justice Committee is one of the 19 Select Committees related to Government Departments, established by the House of Commons under Standing Order No. 152.

Role of the Justice Committee – Parliament Website

Subjects of Inquiry

The Justice Committee chooses its own subjects of inquiry. 

Depending on the subject, external deadlines, and the amount of oral evidence the Committee decides to take, an inquiry may last for several months and give rise to a report to the House; other inquiries may simply consist of a single day’s oral evidence which the Committee may publish without making a report.

When the Committee has chosen an inquiry it normally issues a press notice outlining the main themes of inquiry and inviting interested parties to submit written evidence. It may also identify possible witnesses and issue specific invitations to them to submit written evidence.

Role of the Justice Committee – Parliament Website

Inquiries

Inquiries allow committees to consider oral and written evidence on a particular topic. They usually result in the publication of a report.

All inquires of the Justice Committee past and present are published and can be searched for on the Parliament website.

Contact the Justice Commitee

  • Email: justicecom@parliament.uk
  • Phone: (General Enquiries) 020 7219 7005 (Media Enquiries) 07842 601500
  • Address: House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA
Justice Committee X Feed

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law

What is a Private Prosecution ?

Private prosecution refers to the initiation of criminal proceedings by a private individual or organisation rather than a public authority such as the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in the UK.

In the UK, private prosecutions have a long history and are enshrined in common law, allowing individuals and organisations to bring criminal charges against others for a wide range of offenses.

Private prosecutions are relatively rare in the UK, but they are allowed under section 6(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985.

This article will provide an overview of private prosecution in the UK, including its history, the legal framework, and the process of bringing a private prosecution. It will also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of private prosecution and some high-profile cases.

History of Private Prosecution in the UK

Private prosecution has a long history in the UK, dating back to medieval times. Before the establishment of a professional police force and public prosecution service, private individuals or organisations were responsible for investigating and prosecuting criminal offenses.

In the 19th century, the power to prosecute criminal offenses was gradually transferred to public authorities such as the Crown Prosecution Service. However, private individuals or organisations retained the right to bring private prosecutions, and this right was enshrined in common law.

Today, private prosecution is governed by the Prosecution of Offenses Act 1985 and the Criminal Procedure Rules.

There are, however, some limitations: 

  • the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) has power under section 6(2) POA 1985 to take over private prosecutions;
  • in some cases, the private prosecutor must seek the consent of the Attorney General or of the DPP before the commencement of proceedings.

Legal Framework for Private Prosecution

The legal framework for private prosecution in the UK is set out in the Prosecution of Offenses Act 1985, Criminal Procedure Rules and the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980.

Prosecutions instituted and conducted otherwise than by the Service.

(1)Subject to subsection (2) below, nothing in this Part shall preclude any person from instituting any criminal proceedings or conducting any criminal proceedings to which the Director’s duty to take over the conduct of proceedings does not apply.

Section 6(1) of the Prosecution of Offenses Act 1985

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2020 Part 7 “Starting a Prosecution in a Magistrates’ Court” apply to private prosecutions in the UK.

CPR Part 7 contains specific provisions on the procedure to be followed in private prosecutions, including the requirements for the service of documents, the conduct of preliminary hearings, and the transfer of cases to the Crown Court. These rules provide a clear framework for the conduct of private prosecutions and ensure that they are conducted fairly and efficiently.

Section 1 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (MCA 1980) applies to a laying of information at a Magistrates Court :-

Issue of summons to accused or warrant for his arrest.

On an information being laid before a justice of the peace that a person has, or is suspected of having, committed an offence, the justice may issue—
(a)a summons directed to that person requiring him to appear before a magistrates’ court to answer the information, or
(b)a warrant to arrest that person and bring him before a magistrates’ court

Section 1 Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980

In order to bring a private prosecution, the individual or organisation must have sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the defendant. This means that there must be enough evidence to suggest that the defendant has committed the offense, and that there is a reasonable prospect of conviction.

The process of bringing a private prosecution is similar to that of a public prosecution. The CPS publish legal guidance about Private Prosecutions on their website.

How to bring a Private Prosecution

To bring a private prosecution, an individual must first lay an information.

This is a document that sets out the details of the alleged offense and provides evidence to support the claim. The information must be laid before a magistrate or a judge, who will decide whether or not to issue a summons.

The information must contain the following details:

  • The name and address of the accused
  • The details of the offense, including the date, time, and location
  • The evidence supporting the claim
  • The name and address of the individual or organization bringing the prosecution
  • The name and address of any witnesses

The gov.uk website have published a word document SP001 dated May 2019 Application for summons or warrant for arrest for alleged offence under Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 section 1, CrimPR 7.2(6) which captures all the relevant information to “lay an information” at a Magistrates Court.

You can find a Magistrates Court using the Find a court or tribunal service.

Once the information is laid, the magistrate or judge will consider the evidence and decide, using it’s discretion, whether or not to issue a summons or warrant of arrest.

If the summons is issued, the accused will be required to attend court to answer the charges.

If a warrant of arrest is issued under Section 125 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, then this will be directed to “any constable acting within his police area”.

Advantages of a Private Prosecution

There are several advantages to bringing a private prosecution rather than relying on the public prosecution service.

One of the main advantages is that the individual or organisation has greater control over the proceedings. They can choose the lawyers and experts who will represent them, and they can decide which charges to bring.

Another advantage is that private prosecution can be a more effective way of holding individuals or organisations to account, particularly in cases where the public prosecution service has declined to prosecute. Private prosecutions can also be quicker than public prosecutions, as they are not subject to the same bureaucratic processes.

Disadvantages of Private Prosecution

However, there are also some disadvantages to private prosecution. One of the main disadvantages is the cost.

Private prosecutions can be expensive, as the individual or organisation is responsible for paying for the legal representation and other costs associated with the case. This can be a particular problem for individuals or organisations who do not have significant financial resources.

Private Prosecutions can be seen as a way for individuals and organizations to take the law into their own hands and there is a risk of retaliation, including legal action or harassment.

Private prosecutions can be difficult to win, as the accused person has the right to a fair trial.

If you are considering bringing a private prosecution, it is important to seek legal advice to ensure that you are aware of the risks and potential benefits.

High-Profile Private Prosecutions

In recent years, there have been several high-profile private prosecutions in the United Kingdom that have garnered significant attention. These cases have demonstrated the potential power and impact of private prosecutions in bringing justice to victims and holding individuals accountable for their actions. Let’s explore a few notable examples:

  1. R v. Gary Dobson and David Norris (Stephen Lawrence Case): One of the most prominent private prosecutions in recent UK history was the private prosecution brought by Stephen Lawrence’s family. Stephen Lawrence, a black teenager, was murdered in a racially motivated attack in 1993. Despite strong evidence, the initial investigation failed to secure a conviction. In 1999, Stephen’s parents, Doreen and Neville Lawrence, utilized the private prosecution route to pursue justice. The private prosecution ultimately led to the conviction of Gary Dobson and David Norris for Stephen’s murder in 2012.
  2. R v. John Downey (Hyde Park Bombing Case): In 2013, a private prosecution was initiated against John Downey, who was accused of the 1982 Hyde Park bombing in London, which killed four soldiers and injured many others. The prosecution was launched by the families of the victims after the criminal trial against Downey collapsed due to an error in his prosecution. In 2014, the private prosecution was halted by a judge who ruled that Downey could not face trial again due to an official assurance given to him by the government.
  3. R v. Dale Cregan (Mark Short and David Short Case): Dale Cregan, a notorious criminal, was involved in the murders of Mark Short and his father David Short in 2012 as part of a gangland feud. The Short family decided to pursue a private prosecution against Cregan after the criminal trial against him commenced. However, during the trial, Cregan admitted to the charges, and the private prosecution was discontinued. Nevertheless, this case highlighted the potential for private prosecutions in high-profile criminal matters.

These recent high-profile private prosecutions demonstrate the ability of private individuals to bring justice to victims and hold perpetrators accountable, even in cases where the state prosecution may have faltered or faced challenges. Private prosecutions can play a crucial role in ensuring that no crime goes unpunished.

Private prosecutions are an important part of the legal system in the UK, as they allow individuals to seek justice in the UK legal system.

While there are advantages to bringing a private prosecution, such as control over the case and closure for the victim, there are also several disadvantages.

Nicola Sharp who is a Partner at Rahman Ravelli Solicitors has published a useful article Private Prosecutions: The Process, Defendants’ Options and Mixed Motives.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Equal Justice Under Law
Access To Justice Is A Right Not A Privilege
Rule of Law - Open Justice - Policing By Consent

Ministry of Injustice - Server Monitor