Categories
Policing

Metropolitan Police HMICFRS Assessment 2023 to 2025

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) carried out a PEEL inspection of the Metropolitan Police Service. PEEL stands for police efficiency, effectiveness and legitimacy.

HMICFRS graded the Metropolitan Police’s performance across eight areas of policing. It found the force was adequate in one area, requires improvement in five areas and inadequate in two areas. The Met Police were not graded Outstanding or Good in any areas.

Metropolitan Police HMICFRS Assessment 2023

“The unique challenges facing the Metropolitan Police are not underestimated. Policing the capital city places additional strain on the force and its leadership, as the force tirelessly manages protests, state visits and royal occasions, and national and international sporting events.

“In parallel, the force is in the midst of an organisational-wide transformation, which is significant in both its size and scale. While it was evident in my inspection that many key changes have and are being made, they are not yet translating into consistent and sustained improvements in some key areas.

“While I commend the force for the progress it has made in answering the public’s calls quickly, I have serious concerns about how the force is currently investigating crime and how it manages offenders and suspects.

“I am aware that before our inspection, the force had already recognised the need to achieve better outcomes for victims. However, these plans have not yet led to consistent improvements across the whole force, and more work needs to be done to make sure that this happens.

“We will continue to monitor the Metropolitan Police under our Engage process, and I look forward to seeing the further progress made.”

His Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary Lee Freeman

Since the last HMICFRS inspection in 2022 until the 23rd January 2025, the Metropolitan Police Service was in the HMICFRS enhanced monitoring process, Engage. This gave it greater access to assistance from us, the College of Policing, the Home Office and other law enforcement agencies to make the required improvements. During this period, the force has appointed a new commissioner and deputy commissioner, and published a strategic plan called ‘A New Met for London’, which is aimed at transforming the force.

I have serious concerns about how the force is currently investigating crime and managing offenders and suspects.

I also have concerns about how the force is preventing and reducing crime and providing victims with an effective service.

His Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary Lee Freeman

On the 23rd January 2025 HMCIFRS published Metropolitan police service removed from enhanced monitoring – “The Metropolitan Police Service has made improvements and has therefore been removed from an enhanced level of monitoring by the police inspectorate.”

Check out our related articles on Sussex Police, Chief Constable Jo Shiner Sussex Police, Policing by Consent, Two Tier Policing, Rule of Law, Open Justice, Innocent until Proven Guilty, R v Sussex Justices, What is a Police and Crime Commissioner and a Police and Crime Panel ? and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Legal Professionals

Barristers Behaving Badly

The Bar Standards Board publish Past disciplinary findings on their website in accordance with their Publication Policy. The Bar Standards Board regulate the Bar in England & Wales in the public interest.

The Bar Standards Board post new findings within seven days of a decision, but it can take up to 24 hours after this for the finding to appear on their website (or for a finding to disappear from there after it has been removed).

The Secret Barrister was reported to the Bar Standards Board on the 8th August 2024.

Before instructing a Barrister it is worth checking if they have any past disciplinary findings and if they are registered as a Barrister of England of Wales.

Here is a list of the Bar Standards Board Disciplinary Findings for the last 3 months (as of 13th August 2024). Click Sanction to see the full Disciplinary Statement or Barrister to see their full details.

Lincoln’s Inn has the most badly behaved barristers (disciplined in the last 3 months by the Bar Standards Board) !

Fines, sanctions and costs from Bar Standards Board disciplinary findings against Barristers are normally pitiful. Almost pointless !

i. made comments during the exam as set out in Schedule 1,
ii. used language during the exam as set out in i, ii, iv, and vii of Schedule 1 which was directed towards the proctor,
iii. made an offensive hand gesture by holding up his middle finger to the camera at the conclusion of the exam.

i. What is a watch going to do, how the fuck am I going to cheat with a watch, come on.

ii. What? Fucking piss off, I don’t need to start a fucking chat.

iii. This is annoying, oh my god, this is going to really piss me off.

iv. Right, go away now, fine, just going to sit there fucking flashing and be annoying.

v. Fucking finally, a criminal question… This civil shit… How can you have any ethics if you’re a civil practitioner, honestly.

vi. I’m so fucking bored of this.

vii. You’re going to kick up a fuss about me having a fucking ibuprofen aren’t you.

Barrister Mr Jack Henry Sadler fined just £500 by the Bar Standards Board
BarristerSanctionCostsDecision DateInn of CourtYear of Call
Mr Ikeni John Mbako-AllisonSuspended from practice for 9 months (Sentence still to take effect)£120025/07/2024Gray’s Inn2009
Mr Jack Henry SadlerFined in the sum of £500N/A03/07/2024Middle TempleMar 2023
Mr Henry Joseph Christopher HendronDisbarred (sentence effective from 31 July 2024) and prohibited from being issued with a practising certificate, pending any appeal.£267003/07/2024Middle TempleNov 2006
Mr Matthew Adam FeargrieveProhibited from being issued a practising certificate for 12 months (Sentence effective from 19 June 2024)£156019/06/2024Lincoln’s InnOct 1998
Mr James Patrick DeanDisbarred (Sentence still to take effect)£50006/06/2024Lincoln’s InnNov 1977
Mr Amjad HussainReprimanded and fined in the sum of £5000 (sentence effective from 15 July 2024£267029/05/2024Lincoln’s InnNov 1999
Miss Mary Laureen PokuProhibited from being issued a practising certificate for 24 months (Sentence effective from 7 June 2024) and prohibited from being issued with a practising certificate, pending any appeal, under rE227.3 (as an unregistered barrister)£3251.3508/05/2024Lincoln’s InnNov 1993
Barrister Disciplinary Findings – England and Wales

Barrister Mr Thomas David Davidson used a German accent during a hearing and said “Jawohl” at the same time as raising a hand in a Nazi salute. He was reprimanded by the Bar Standards Board and was fined £250 with costs of £1,750.

This is hardly a punishment or deterrent by the Bar Standards Board. Where is the justice in this pathetic reprimand ?

Check out our related articles on Barristers, Direct Access Barrister, The Secret Barrister, Bar Standards Board, Bar Council, Inns of Court, Council of the Inns of Court, Rule of Law, Open Justice, Innocent until Proven Guilty and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

Read the reviews of Junior Sussex Barrister Gavin Howe and Legal 500 Junior Barrister Eleanor Battie

“He is awful, underhanded and should not be practising law!”

She is a one-woman legal A Team”

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Criminal Justice

Court Proceedings Videos

The latest cases in the Crown Court and Court of Appeal are available on the Sky News Courts YouTube channel. These videos are an opportunity to see justice in action.

Section 41 of the Criminal Justice Act 1925 (CJA 1925) makes it an offence to take any photograph, make or attempt to make any portrait or sketch of a justice or a witness in, or a party to, any proceedings before the court, either in the courtroom or its precincts.

The Crimes and Courts Act 2013 allows the ban to be disapplied in certain circumstances by secondary legislation. For instance, the Court of Appeal and Competition Appeal Tribunal can broadcast proceedings. The Crown court can broadcast sentencing remarks. The Supreme Court is excluded from the two bans because cases heard by the UK’s highest court, which was established in 2009, would have previously been heard in the House of Lords where broadcasting was allowed.

See Photography in Court for more information.

High Profile Cases Videos

Lady Chief Justice gives judgment in the Court of Appeal – Shamima Begum
High Court Judge Mr Justice Goss imposed life sentences with whole-life orders – Lucy Letby

Latest Court Proceedings Videos

Please be advised that videos may contain graphic descriptions of serious crimes, including murder and sexual offences.

Check out our related articles on Rule of Law, Open Justice, Innocent until Proven Guilty and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Criminal Justice Legal Analysis Policing

What is Two Tier Policing ?

The BBC describes so-called “two-tier policing” as where right-wing protests are considered to be dealt with more harshly than left-wing ones by the police. This explanation is simply not true.

The most simplistic and accurate explanation of two tier policing is that there’s one rule for one person and another rule for another. The publicly shown bias and discrimination by the Police is manifesting itself irrespective of politics, sexuality, race or colour.

The police should and must operate independently under the law without fear or favour. The Rule of Law applies to everyone regardless of who they are. Policing in this country and around the world is by consent. There should no bias by the police or by anyone in the justice system.

The debate over two-tiered policing has significant implications for public trust in law enforcement. If the perception of biased policing persists, it can erode confidence in the police and exacerbate social divisions. On the other hand, dismissing legitimate concerns about unequal treatment can also harm community relations and hinder efforts to address systemic issues within law enforcement.

Two-tiered policing remains a contentious issue, with strong arguments on both sides. While some see it as a reflection of systemic biases within law enforcement, others view it as a necessary differentiation based on the nature of the protests or other lawlessness.

Regardless of where one stands on the issue, it is crucial to continue scrutinising police practices to ensure fairness and accountability in all aspects of law enforcement.

The State of Policing Report 2022 and the Loss of Public Trust by HMICFRS said amongst other things “The public’s trust and confidence are unacceptably low. The fundamental principle of policing by consent, upon which the service is built, is at risk.”

The discussion of #TwoTierPolicing #TwoTierJustice and #TwoTierKeir along with Free Speech is very much alive on X.

Sir Keir Starmer stated there is no two-tier policing and said it is a “non-issue”.

Elon Musk calls out Sir Keir Starmer as #TwoTierKeir

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has called accusations of two-tier policing “complete nonsense”.

They are hardly going to agree that there is Two Tier Policing ?! Maybe the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) should investigate ? Is the accusation of Police bias worthy of Judicial Review ?

Do you have evidence of two tier policing by the Met Police, West Midlands Police or any other UK police forces ? Contact Us

Met Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley demonstrates violent thuggery and Two Tiered Policing without Fear or Favour.
Superintendent Emlyn Richards of West Midlands Police explains Two Tier Policing in simple language.
The Guardian have been telling people about two-tier policing based on race and sexuality for decades

Check out our related articles on Thought Police, Sussex Police, Met Police, Chief Constable Jo Shiner Sussex Police, Policing by Consent, What is a Police and Crime Commissioner and a Police and Crime Panel ?, Rule of Law, Open Justice, Innocent until Proven Guilty, R v Sussex Justices and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Legal Analysis Policing

What is Policing by Consent ?

Policing by consent is a fundamental principle that underpins modern democratic societies. It is a concept rooted in the belief that the authority of the police derives from the consent and cooperation of the public they serve, as opposed to the power of the state.

It does not mean the consent of an individual. No individual can chose to withdraw their consent from the police, or from a law.

British policing is based on consent, meaning the ability of the police to carry out their functions rests on ‘public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour’

Police accountabilityInstitute for Government

The nine principles of policing by consent, often referred to as the Peelian principles, were articulated by Sir Robert Peel.

There is no evidence that these principles were devised by Sir Robert Peel and it more than likely that they were devised by the first Commissioners of Police of the Metropolis (Sir Charles Rowan and Sir Richard Mayne).

What are the Peelian Principles ?

  1. To prevent crime and disorder, as an alternative to their repression by military force and severity of legal punishment.
  2. To recognise always that the power of the police to fulfil their functions and duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.
  3. To recognise always that to secure and maintain the respect and approval of the public means also the securing of the willing co-operation of the public in the task of securing observance of laws.
  4. To recognise always that the extent to which the co-operation of the public can be secured diminishes proportionately the necessity of the use of physical force and compulsion for achieving police objectives.
  5. To seek and preserve public favour, not by pandering to public opinion; but by constantly demonstrating absolutely impartial service to law, in complete independence of policy, and without regard to the justice or injustice of the substance of individual laws, by ready offering of individual service and friendship to all members of the public without regard to their wealth or social standing, by ready exercise of courtesy and friendly good humour; and by ready offering of individual sacrifice in protecting and preserving life.
  6. To use physical force only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient to obtain public co-operation to an extent necessary to secure observance of law or to restore order, and to use only the minimum degree of physical force which is necessary on any particular occasion for achieving a police objective.
  7. To maintain at all times a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and that the public are the police, the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
  8. To recognise always the need for strict adherence to police-executive functions, and to refrain from even seeming to usurp the powers of the judiciary of avenging individuals or the State, and of authoritatively judging guilt and punishing the guilty.
  9. To recognise always that the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, and not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them.

Since 1829 these ‘General Instructions’ have been issued to every new police officer.  

History of Policing by Consent

The origins of policing by consent can be traced back to the early 19th century in England. Prior to this period, law enforcement was often characterised by a lack of professionalism, corruption, and arbitrary use of power.

In 1829, Sir Robert Peel introduced the Metropolitan Police Act, which established the Metropolitan Police in London. This act marked a significant shift in policing philosophy, emphasising the idea of police as a civilian force serving the community rather than a military presence.

To implement his vision, Sir Robert Peel appointed Sir Charles Rowan and Sir Richard Mayne as the first Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police. Rowan and Mayne were instrumental in establishing a professional police force based on Peel’s principles. They implemented rigorous recruitment standards, emphasised training and discipline, and ensured that the police operated under public scrutiny and consent.

Under the leadership of Rowan and Mayne, the Metropolitan Police successfully transformed the concept of policing in London. Their commitment to upholding the principles of policing by consent set a precedent that would influence police forces worldwide.

Sir Robert Peel

Sir Robert Peel (1788-1850) was a British statesman and is widely regarded as the founder of modern policing. Born in Bury, Lancashire, England, Peel had a distinguished political career and served as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom twice, from 1834 to 1835 and from 1841 to 1846.

Peel is most renowned for his significant contributions to law enforcement and criminal justice reforms.

Peel’s reforms also included the establishment of the first detective force, the improvement of police training and professionalism, and the standardisation of police uniforms and equipment. His contributions to policing set the stage for the development of professional law enforcement agencies that focus on crime prevention, community engagement, and the protection of individual rights.

Beyond his work in law enforcement, Peel made other significant contributions to British politics. He was instrumental in the repeal of the Corn Laws, which were tariffs on imported grain that had protected British agriculture but contributed to high food prices for consumers. The repeal of these laws had a profound impact on British trade and economic development.

Sir Robert Peel’s legacy as a statesman and reformer, particularly in the field of policing, remains influential to this day. His principles continue to shape the foundations of modern law enforcement, emphasising the importance of community consent, accountability, and professionalism in the maintenance of public safety and order.

Sir Charles Rowan and Sir Richard Mayne

Sir Charles Rowan and Sir Richard Mayne were two key figures who played significant roles in the establishment and development of the Metropolitan Police in London, working closely with Sir Robert Peel. They were the first Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police, serving under Peel’s leadership and implementing his vision of professional policing.

Sir Charles Rowan (1782-1852) was a British soldier and police administrator. He was appointed as one of the two Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police when it was first established in 1829. Rowan brought his military experience and organisational skills to the role, contributing to the professionalisation and efficiency of the police force. He worked closely with Peel to implement reforms and ensure that the principles of policing by consent were upheld. Rowan’s emphasis on discipline, training, and strategic deployment of police resources helped shape the early foundations of the Metropolitan Police.

Sir Richard Mayne (1796-1868) was a British lawyer and civil servant. He also served as one of the original Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police alongside Rowan. Mayne, known for his administrative abilities, played a crucial role in developing the infrastructure and operations of the police force. He focused on establishing clear guidelines, procedures, and protocols for police officers, ensuring that they operated within the framework of the law and maintained public trust. Mayne’s contributions helped to solidify the principles of accountability, impartiality, and transparency within the Metropolitan Police.

Rowan and Mayne worked collaboratively to shape the structure and functioning of the Metropolitan Police. They were responsible for recruiting and training officers, establishing a hierarchical command structure, and implementing policies that aligned with Peel’s principles.

Their efforts were instrumental in the successful establishment of a professional and civilian police force in London, setting a standard for policing practices that influenced law enforcement agencies both in the United Kingdom and internationally.

Policing by Consent around the World

Here are some examples of how the Peelian principles of policing by consent have influenced policing globally:-

  1. The principles of policing by consent have had a profound influence on law enforcement practices in the United States. Many police departments strive to build positive relationships with the communities they serve, engaging in community-oriented policing initiatives, implementing transparency measures, and emphasising de-escalation techniques. The principles have also informed the development of professional standards and training programs for officers.
  2. Australian police forces have embraced the Peelian principles as a foundation for their operations. Community engagement, collaboration, and accountability are emphasised in Australian policing, with efforts made to build trust and partnerships with the diverse communities across the country. The principles have guided the development of community policing programs and the adoption of ethical standards.
  3. Policing in Canada is influenced by the Peelian principles, particularly in terms of community engagement and accountability. Canadian police agencies have adopted community policing strategies, emphasising the importance of building relationships, problem-solving, and preventative measures. The principles also guide the training and professional conduct of Canadian police officers.
  4. The Peelian principles have shaped the philosophy of policing in New Zealand. The New Zealand Police explicitly incorporate the principles into their values and code of conduct. The focus on community engagement, proactive policing, and respect for human rights aligns with the Peelian principles. New Zealand Police have also emphasised the importance of building trust and legitimacy through transparency and accountability.
  5. Policing in various European countries has been influenced by the Peelian principles. Concepts such as community policing, the protection of individual rights, and the need for police legitimacy are prevalent across European police forces. Efforts are made to establish partnerships with communities, promote equality and impartiality, and maintain transparency in police operations.

It’s important to note that while the Peelian principles have had a broad impact on policing worldwide, the specific application and implementation may vary across different countries, taking into account local laws and cultures.

Nonetheless, the principles continue to shape the ongoing development of modern policing, emphasising the importance of maintaining public trust and collaboration with the communities they serve.

Check out our related articles on Rule of Law, Open Justice, Innocent until Proven Guilty, What is Two Tier Policing, Police Community Support Officers (PCSO), Thought Police, Chief Constable Jo Shiner Sussex Police, What is a Police and Crime Commissioner ?, Sussex Police, R v Sussex Justices and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law

Rule of Law

The rule of law is a fundamental principle of democratic societies that underpins the concept of justice and fairness.

It refers to the idea that all individuals and institutions are subject to the same set of laws and procedures, regardless of their position or status.

This means that the law should be applied equally to everyone, without discrimination, and that no one is above the law.

Origins of the Rule of Law

The origins of the rule of law can be traced back to ancient civilizations such as Greece and Rome, where it was seen as a key component of a just and stable society.

In ancient Greece, the philosopher Aristotle wrote about the importance of the rule of law in preventing the abuse of power and promoting the common good.

Similarly, in ancient Rome, the idea of the rule of law was embodied in the concept of “equal protection under the law,” which was enshrined in the Roman legal system.

In more recent times, the rule of law has been a central tenet of modern democratic societies.

It was first articulated as a formal principle during the Enlightenment, when thinkers such as Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau argued that the power of the state should be limited by law, and that citizens should have certain rights and freedoms that were protected by the law.

Importance of the Rule of Law

The rule of law is important for several reasons. First and foremost, it helps to ensure that everyone is treated fairly and equally under the law. This means that no one can be arbitrarily deprived of their rights or subjected to unfair treatment by those in positions of power.

Secondly, the rule of law is crucial for maintaining social order and stability. When people believe that the law is just and that it is being applied fairly, they are more likely to respect it and to comply with it voluntarily. This helps to prevent social unrest and disorder, and ensures that conflicts are resolved through peaceful means.

Thirdly, the rule of law is essential for protecting individual freedoms and rights. By providing a framework of laws and procedures that are designed to protect individual rights, such as freedom of speech, assembly, and religion, the rule of law helps to prevent abuses of power and ensures that people are able to live their lives in accordance with their own values and beliefs.

The Rule of Law in the UK

The rule of law is a fundamental principle of the UK’s constitutional system. It is enshrined in a number of key legal documents, including the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights 1689, and the Human Rights Act 1998.

In practice, the rule of law is upheld by the judiciary, which is independent of the government and other branches of the state. The courts are responsible for interpreting and applying the law, and for ensuring that the government and other public bodies act in accordance with the law.

The rule of law is also central to the UK’s relationship with the European Union. As a member of the EU, the UK was bound by EU law and subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

This helped to ensure that the UK government and other public bodies acted in accordance with EU law and that citizens were able to enforce their rights under EU law.

The Rule of Law around the World

The rule of law is also an important principle in the international arena. It is enshrined in the United Nations Charter and in a number of other international agreements and treaties.

One of the key functions of international law is to promote the rule of law in relations between states, by providing a framework for the peaceful resolution of disputes and the protection of human rights. International law also helps to promote cooperation and collaboration between states, by setting out common standards and norms for behaviour.

However, the rule of law is not always respected in the international arena. In some parts of the world, governments and other institutions may be corrupt or lack the capacity to enforce the law effectively. This can lead to human rights abuses, social unrest, and conflict.

In addition, there are concerns about the erosion of the rule of law in some countries, as governments may seek to restrict the rights and freedoms of their citizens in the name of national security or other interests.

The Importance of Upholding the Rule of Law

The rule of law is a fundamental principle of democratic societies, and its importance cannot be overstated. When the rule of law is respected, it helps to ensure that all individuals and institutions are held accountable, and that everyone is treated fairly and equally under the law.

The rule of law is also essential for maintaining social order and stability, protecting individual freedoms and rights, and promoting cooperation and collaboration between states.

In order to uphold the rule of law, it is essential that governments and other institutions act in accordance with the law, and that the judiciary is independent and impartial. It is also important for citizens to be informed about their rights and responsibilities under the law, and to be able to enforce those rights through the courts if necessary.

The rule of law is a fundamental principle of democratic societies, and its importance cannot be overstated. It helps to ensure that all individuals and institutions are held accountable, and that everyone is treated fairly and equally under the law.

In the UK, the rule of law is enshrined an unwritten constitution made up of various sources, including statutes, case law, and conventions which is upheld by an independent judiciary. The principle of the rule of law is an important aspect of the UK’s constitutional framework.

The UK’s longstanding commitment to the Rule of Law is under grave threat according to the landmark report The State We’re In: Addressing Threats & Challenges to the Rule of Law written by the legal charity JUSTICE.

In the world, the rule of law is an important principle in international relations, and is enshrined in a number of international agreements and treaties. However, there are concerns about the erosion of the rule of law in some countries, and the need to promote and protect the rule of law globally.

Ultimately, the rule of law is essential for promoting justice, fairness, and equality in societies around the world, and for ensuring that human rights and freedoms are protected and respected.

Check out our related articles on Law Commission, Law Society, Innocent until Proven GuiltyOpen Justice, Open Justice Licence ?, Reasonable Person Test, Policing by Consent, What is Two Tier Policing, R v Sussex Justices and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Law

Innocent until proven guilty

The concept of “innocent until proven guilty” is a fundamental principle of the justice system in many countries around the world. The principle is that an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. It is also known as “The presumption of innocence”.

This principle is enshrined in the Human Rights Act 1998 and the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.

What is the concept of innocent until proven guilty ?

The concept of innocent until proven guilty dates back to ancient Roman law. It is a cornerstone of the justice system in many countries around the world. The principle is based on the idea that an individual is presumed innocent until the prosecution proves otherwise. This principle is essential because it protects the rights of the accused and ensures that justice is served.

The Human Rights Act 1998

The Human Rights Act 1998 is a piece of legislation in the United Kingdom that incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law. The act is intended to protect the rights and freedoms of individuals in the UK. One of the most important rights protected by the Human Rights Act 1998 is the right to a fair trial.

The right to a fair trial includes the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. This means that the prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. The right to a fair trial also includes the right to legal representation, the right to examine witnesses, and the right to a public trial.

(1) In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.

(2) Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.

(3) Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:

(a)to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;

(b)to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;

(c)to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;

(d)to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;

(e)to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.

Right to a Fair Trial Article 6 Human Rights Act 1998

The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights

The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights is a document adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. The declaration sets out a range of fundamental human rights that should be protected around the world. The declaration includes the right to a fair trial.

Article 11 of the declaration states that “Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.” This article emphasizes the importance of the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial.

Trial by media

The issue of trial by media has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. Trial by media refers to the situation where an individual is tried and convicted in the court of public opinion before they have had a chance to defend themselves in a court of law. This situation is often exacerbated by sensationalist media coverage and the use of social media.

Trial by media can have a significant impact on the accused, including damage to their reputation and public humiliation. In some cases, trial by media can even lead to the denial of a fair trial.

Examples of trial by media

One example of trial by media occurred in the case of Amanda Knox, an American student who was accused of murdering her roommate in Italy in 2007. The case received extensive media coverage, with many media outlets portraying Knox as guilty before the trial even began. Knox was eventually acquitted, but the media coverage had a significant impact on her reputation.

Another example of trial by media occurred in the case of Barry George, who was accused of murdering British television presenter Jill Dando in 1999. The media coverage of the case was highly sensationalised, and George was portrayed as guilty before the trial even began. George was eventually acquitted, but the media coverage had a lasting impact on his reputation.

In conclusion, the principle of innocent until proven guilty is a fundamental aspect of the justice system in many countries around the world. It is essential to protect the rights of the accused and ensure that justice is served.

The issue of trial by media must be addressed to ensure that individuals are not unfairly tried and convicted in the court of public opinion. The media has a responsibility to report fairly and objectively on legal proceedings, and individuals have the right to a fair trial, including the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Judiciary Legal Professionals

Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) are an independent office which supports the Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice in considering complaints about the personal conduct of judicial office holders.

It was established in 2006, following the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, which reformed the way in which judges are appointed, disciplined and removed from office.

Make sure to read our article about the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board (SFJB) and its board members such as His Honour Judge Farquhar.

‘The commissioner’s decision is that the JCIO is not a statutory body. He finds that the JCIO is part of the MoJ which is a public authority for the purposes of FOIA. By failing to confirm whether it held the requested information within 20 working days, the MoJ has breached sections 1(1)(a) and 10(1) of FOIA.’

Judicial Conduct Investigations Office must comply with FoI requests

Rules and Regulations

The 2014 Judicial Discipline Regulations and supporting rules came into effect from 18 August 2014

How to Complain

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office can only deal with complaints about the personal conduct of judicial office holders. This means that they cannot accept complaints about a judge’s decision or the way a judge has managed a case.

The JCIO Making A Complaint website contains all the details along with the link to the JCIO portal.

Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC) – 2004

Before the establishment of the JCIO, the responsibility for investigating complaints against judges rested with the Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC), which was established in 2004. The OJC was a part of the Ministry of Justice and had the power to investigate complaints made against judges in England and Wales.

However, the OJC was widely criticized for being insufficiently independent and for lacking transparency. In response to these criticisms, the government established the JCIO in 2006 as an independent body to investigate complaints against judges.

Judicial Complaints Investigation Bureau (JCIB) -1991

Before the Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC) was established in 2004, the responsibility for investigating complaints against judges in England and Wales rested with the Judicial Complaints Investigation Bureau (JCIB), which was created in 1991.

The JCIB was a division of the Lord Chancellor’s Department (which later became the Ministry of Justice), and it was responsible for investigating complaints about the personal conduct of judges. However, the JCIB was criticized for being insufficiently independent and for lacking transparency, particularly following a high-profile case in 1993 involving a judge who was found to have used racist language.

JCIO Powers

The JCIO is responsible for investigating complaints about the personal conduct of judges, as well as their professional conduct. It has the power to investigate complaints made by members of the public, legal professionals, and other judges.

The JCIO’s investigations are carried out by a team of investigators who are independent of the judiciary.

Overall, the establishment of the JCIO was seen as an important step in ensuring the independence and integrity of the judiciary in England and Wales.

Disciplinary Statements

You can check if a a judge has had any disciplinary action against them as Disciplinary statements are published on the JCIO website and are sorted by year.

The JCIO publication policy states that a statement will normally be published when a disciplinary sanction has been issued to a judicial office-holder for misconduct.

The Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor may decide jointly to:

  • issue a statement in any case;
  • decline to issue a statement in any case;
  • delete a statement prior to the expiration of the relevant publication period.

Publication Periods

Statements published before 22 August 2022

Statements about cases which resulted in a sanction below removal from office will be deleted after one year. Statements about cases which resulted in removal from office will be deleted after five years.

Statements published from 22 August 2022

The following publication periods apply to statements published from 22 August 2022. Following the outcome of the 2020-22 review of the disciplinary system, statements now contain more detail. The JCIO privacy notice has been updated to reflect this change.

Sanction ImposedPublication Period
Formal AdviceTwo Years
Formal WarningFour Years
ReprimandSix Years
Removal from Office (except for failure to meet minimum sitting requirements)Indefinite
Removal from Office for failure to meet minimum sitting requirementsFive years

Requesting a Copy of a Deleted Statement

A copy of any statement which has been deleted following expiration of its publication period can be requested by emailing: general.enquiries@judicialconduct.gov.uk

Requesters must state the name of the office-holder. It will also help to locate statements if requesters give as much information as possible about the nature of the conduct for which the office-holder received a disciplinary sanction, and the year in which they believe the statement was published.

JCIO aims to reply to all requests for deleted statements within 10 working days.

JCIO Publication Policy

JCIO Disciplinary Statements 2025/2026

JCIO Disciplinary Statements 2024/2025

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Legal Analysis

What is Christophobia ?

Christophobia, or Christianophobia, refers to an irrational fear, hatred, discrimination, or prejudice against Christians, Christianity, or its practices. Here’s a deeper look based on various perspectives and historical contexts:

  • Definition and Usage: The term combines “Christo-” (referring to Christ or Christianity) with “-phobia” (from the Greek word for fear). While the suffix might suggest an irrational fear, in broader usage, it encompasses hatred, bias, and discrimination as well. This term has been used in discussions around the world, including in academic, religious, and political contexts, to describe various forms of anti-Christian sentiment.
  • Historical Context:
    • Ancient Persecution: Early Christians faced persecution in the Roman Empire, where refusal to worship Roman gods led to their marginalization and often violent suppression.
    • Modern Instances: Throughout history, from the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror to the Soviet Union’s state atheism, there have been notable periods where Christianity was actively suppressed or persecuted.
  • Contemporary Manifestations:
    • Western World: Here, Christophobia might manifest more subtly through cultural disdain, legal challenges to religious freedoms, or media portrayals that marginalize Christian beliefs. There’s an observed trend where Christian values or symbols are removed from public spaces or discourse, often under the guise of secularism or neutrality.
    • Other Regions: In some parts of the world, especially where other religious or ideological groups hold power, Christians might face overt persecution, including violence, forced conversions, or severe legal restrictions.
  • Public Discourse and Recognition:
    • International Bodies: Terms like “Christianophobia” have been recognized in some UN documents alongside other forms of religious discrimination like Islamophobia and anti-Semitism, indicating a global acknowledgment of the phenomenon.
    • Debate Over Terminology: There’s debate over using “-phobia” due to its implication of irrational fear rather than just hatred or discrimination. Critics argue this might oversimplify complex socio-political dynamics or be used to stifle criticism of Christianity.
  • Cultural and Social Implications:
    • In Media and Academia: There’s an observed trend where Christianity might be portrayed negatively or critically in media or academic settings, sometimes leading to a broader cultural disdain or dismissal of Christian beliefs.
    • Legal and Political: This can translate into policies or legal decisions that limit Christian expression or practice, often framed within discussions of secularism, human rights, or equality.
  • Christian Perspective: From a Christian viewpoint, as reflected in some theological discussions, Christophobia might be seen as part of a broader spiritual battle, where opposition to Christian values or practices is expected due to the inherent conflict between worldly values and Christian teachings.
  • Public Sentiment on X: On platforms like X, discussions around Christophobia often highlight personal experiences of discrimination, cultural shifts against Christian norms, or compare the treatment of Christianity with other religions in terms of public discourse and legal protections.

In summary, Christophobia describes a spectrum of negative attitudes and actions against Christians and Christianity, ranging from subtle cultural biases to overt persecution. The term, while debated for its accuracy or appropriateness, captures a recognised phenomenon of anti-Christian sentiment globally.

You may be interested in our article What is Islamophobia ?

What is a Christian ?

A Christian is an adherent of Christianity, which is a monotheistic religion based on the life, teachings, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, as described in the New Testament of the Bible. Here’s a more detailed breakdown:

Core Beliefs:

  • Jesus Christ: Christians believe that Jesus is the Messiah (or Christ) prophesied in the Old Testament, the Son of God, and part of the Holy Trinity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit). Jesus is central to Christian faith, seen as both fully divine and fully human.
  • Salvation: Many Christians believe in salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. This often involves the concept that Jesus died to atone for humanity’s sins, offering forgiveness and eternal life to those who believe in him.
  • The Bible: Christians generally accept the Bible as the authoritative word of God, comprising the Old Testament (shared with Judaism) and the New Testament, which includes the Gospels (accounts of Jesus’s life), Acts of the Apostles, epistles (letters from early Christian leaders), and the Book of Revelation.
  • Resurrection: The belief in Jesus’s resurrection from the dead is fundamental, symbolising victory over sin and death.

Practices:

  • Worship: This can include attending church services, prayer, reading the Bible, and participating in sacraments or ordinances like baptism and the Eucharist (or Communion).
  • Community: Christianity often emphasizes community life, fellowship, and acts of charity and service, reflecting Jesus’s teachings on love, forgiveness, and helping others.
  • Moral and Ethical Living: Christians are encouraged to live according to the moral and ethical teachings of Jesus, which include loving one’s neighbor as oneself, forgiveness, humility, and honesty.

Diversity in Christianity:

  • Denominations: Christianity has numerous denominations (e.g., Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox), each with variations in doctrine, practice, and governance. These differences can affect how the faith is practiced and interpreted.
  • Cultural Expressions: Christianity has adapted to various cultures worldwide, leading to a rich diversity in worship styles, theological emphases, and social practices.

Historical Context:

  • Origins: Christianity began in the 1st century in Judea, spreading rapidly throughout the Roman Empire and beyond, influenced by the missionary work of the Apostles and early followers.
  • Development: Over centuries, Christianity has evolved, split, and reformed, influenced by theological debates, cultural integration, and historical events like the Reformation in the 16th century.

Modern Christianity:

  • Global Presence: Christianity is one of the world’s largest religions, with followers on every continent. It plays significant roles in global politics, culture, and social issues.
  • Contemporary Issues: Modern Christians engage with various issues like human rights, environmental stewardship, social justice, and the relationship between church and state, often reflecting diverse interpretations of Christian teachings.

Identity:

  • Personal Faith: Being a Christian can be as much about personal faith, a relationship with God through Jesus, as it is about communal practice or doctrinal adherence.
  • Lifestyle: For many, Christian identity influences lifestyle choices, moral decisions, and worldview, aiming to emulate the life and teachings of Jesus.

In essence, a Christian is someone who follows Jesus Christ, embracing his teachings and often seeking to live by his example, though the specifics of belief and practice can vary widely across the global Christian community.

What is a Phobia ?

A phobia is an extreme or irrational fear of an object, place, situation, feeling, or animal. Here’s a more detailed look:

Definition:

  • Medical Definition: In clinical psychology, a phobia is classified as an anxiety disorder where the fear experienced is significantly disproportionate to the actual danger posed by the object or situation. This fear often leads to avoidance behaviors, which can interfere with daily life.

Characteristics:

  • Excessive Fear: The fear is out of proportion to the actual threat. For example, while it’s normal to feel cautious around heights, someone with acrophobia might experience debilitating fear even on a low ladder.
  • Avoidance: People with phobias often go to great lengths to avoid the source of their fear. This avoidance can limit their activities and restrict their lives.
  • Anxiety Response: Encountering or even thinking about the phobic stimulus can trigger an immediate anxiety response, which might include symptoms like sweating, rapid heartbeat, trembling, shortness of breath, or a full-blown panic attack.
  • Recognition of Irrationality: Typically, individuals with phobias acknowledge that their fear is excessive or unreasonable, yet they feel powerless to control it.

Types of Phobias:

  • Specific Phobias: These are fears centered around a particular object or situation, like arachnophobia (fear of spiders) or claustrophobia (fear of confined spaces).
  • Social Phobia (Social Anxiety Disorder): This involves an intense fear of social situations, particularly of being judged or scrutinized by others, leading to avoidance of social interactions.
  • Agoraphobia: Often misunderstood as a fear of open spaces, it’s more about fear of environments where escape or help might not be immediately available, like public transportation, open spaces, or being outside the home alone.

Treatment:

  • Exposure Therapy: Gradually and repeatedly exposing the person to their fear in a controlled way helps reduce the fear response over time.
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): This helps individuals change the way they think (cognitive patterns) and act (behavior) towards the feared object or situation.
  • Medication: While not a cure, medications like beta-blockers or antidepressants can help manage symptoms, particularly in conjunction with therapy.
  • Virtual Reality Therapy: Increasingly used for exposure therapy, especially for phobias like fear of flying or heights.

Cultural Context:

Phobias can also be culturally influenced. What might be considered a phobia in one culture might be a normal fear or even a revered trait in another. For example, in some cultures, a fear of spirits or the supernatural might be more widespread and accepted.

Understanding phobias involves recognising them not just as irrational fears but as complex psychological conditions that can significantly impact an individual’s quality of life. Treatment often focuses on helping individuals manage and eventually overcome these fears, allowing them to live more freely.

Racist and Religious Hate Crime

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) have published the Racist and Religious Hate Crime – Prosecution Guidance which assists their prosecutors when they are making decisions about cases. It is regularly updated to reflect changes in law and practice.

“Using threatening, abusive or insulting language to rile up racism online is unacceptable and is breaking the law……It is not an offence to have strong or differing political views, but it is an offence to incite racial hatred”

Frank Ferguson, Head of the Crown Prosecution Service’s Special Crime and Counter Terrorism Unit

Check out our related articles on Rule of Law, Open Justice, Innocent until Proven Guilty and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Categories
Legal Analysis

What is Islamophobia ?

Islamophobia refers to an irrational fear, hostility, or prejudice against Islam, Muslims or those perceived to be Muslim. Here’s a breakdown based on various perspectives and definitions:

  • General Definition: At its core, Islamophobia is described as an aversion, hostility, or fear of Islam or Muslims. This can manifest in various forms, including discrimination, negative stereotyping, and bias-motivated violence or harassment.
  • Historical Context: The term has roots tracing back to the early 20th century, but it gained significant traction in the late 1990s. Historically, tensions between Islamic empires and European Christian entities during the Middle Ages laid some groundwork for what evolved into modern Islamophobia. This was exacerbated by colonial narratives, the post-9/11 “War on Terror,” and media portrayals linking Islam with terrorism.
  • As Racism: Some scholars and activists argue that Islamophobia should be considered a form of racism, especially since it often targets cultural and ethnic markers associated with Muslim identity, not just religious beliefs. This perspective sees Islamophobia as a form of cultural racism, where discrimination is based on perceived cultural or religious differences.
  • Criticism and Controversy: There’s debate around the term itself. Critics argue that labelling criticism of Islamic practices or doctrines as “Islamophobia” can sometimes be used to stifle legitimate critique or discussion. Some view the term as a tool to engineer guilt or silence dissent, suggesting that not all fear or criticism of Islam is irrational or phobic, but might be based on specific actions or interpretations of Islamic teachings.
  • Impact: Islamophobia has real-world impacts, leading to policies of surveillance, discrimination in employment, housing, and education, hate crimes, and social exclusion. It’s not just about individual prejudice but also about systemic discrimination and institutional practices that marginalize Muslims.
  • Public Sentiment: From posts on X, there’s a spectrum of views. Some see Islamophobia as a justified response to perceived threats, while others view it as a form of racism or a tool for political manipulation. There’s also a narrative where understanding Islamophobia is equated with understanding its historical and political context, including how it’s been weaponized in discourse.
  • UN Perspective: The United Nations has recognized Islamophobia, designating March 15 as the International Day to Combat Islamophobia, aiming to promote tolerance and peace based on respect for human rights and religious diversity.
‘What about Hindu, Sikh phobia?’: India calls out U.N resolution on Islamophobia

You may be interested in our article What is Christophobia ?

What is a Phobia ?

A phobia is an extreme or irrational fear of an object, place, situation, feeling, or animal. Here’s a more detailed look:

Definition:

  • Medical Definition: In clinical psychology, a phobia is classified as an anxiety disorder where the fear experienced is significantly disproportionate to the actual danger posed by the object or situation. This fear often leads to avoidance behaviors, which can interfere with daily life.

Characteristics:

  • Excessive Fear: The fear is out of proportion to the actual threat. For example, while it’s normal to feel cautious around heights, someone with acrophobia might experience debilitating fear even on a low ladder.
  • Avoidance: People with phobias often go to great lengths to avoid the source of their fear. This avoidance can limit their activities and restrict their lives.
  • Anxiety Response: Encountering or even thinking about the phobic stimulus can trigger an immediate anxiety response, which might include symptoms like sweating, rapid heartbeat, trembling, shortness of breath, or a full-blown panic attack.
  • Recognition of Irrationality: Typically, individuals with phobias acknowledge that their fear is excessive or unreasonable, yet they feel powerless to control it.

Types of Phobias:

  • Specific Phobias: These are fears centered around a particular object or situation, like arachnophobia (fear of spiders) or claustrophobia (fear of confined spaces).
  • Social Phobia (Social Anxiety Disorder): This involves an intense fear of social situations, particularly of being judged or scrutinized by others, leading to avoidance of social interactions.
  • Agoraphobia: Often misunderstood as a fear of open spaces, it’s more about fear of environments where escape or help might not be immediately available, like public transportation, open spaces, or being outside the home alone.

Treatment:

  • Exposure Therapy: Gradually and repeatedly exposing the person to their fear in a controlled way helps reduce the fear response over time.
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): This helps individuals change the way they think (cognitive patterns) and act (behavior) towards the feared object or situation.
  • Medication: While not a cure, medications like beta-blockers or antidepressants can help manage symptoms, particularly in conjunction with therapy.
  • Virtual Reality Therapy: Increasingly used for exposure therapy, especially for phobias like fear of flying or heights.

Cultural Context:

Phobias can also be culturally influenced. What might be considered a phobia in one culture might be a normal fear or even a revered trait in another. For example, in some cultures, a fear of spirits or the supernatural might be more widespread and accepted.

Understanding phobias involves recognising them not just as irrational fears but as complex psychological conditions that can significantly impact an individual’s quality of life. Treatment often focuses on helping individuals manage and eventually overcome these fears, allowing them to live more freely.

Official UK Government Definition of Islamophobia September 2024

Deputy Prime Minister The Rt Hon Angela Rayner MP asked for the Government Definition of Islamophobia on the 2nd September 2024

What is the difference between Islam and a Muslim

The distinction between Islam and a Muslim is fundamental to understanding both the religion and its followers:

  • Definition: Islam is a monotheistic religion that originated in the 7th century in what is now Saudi Arabia. The word “Islam” itself means “submission” or “surrender” in Arabic, referring to submission to the will of God (Allah).
  • Core Beliefs:
    • Tawhid: The oneness of God. Muslims believe in one God, Allah, who is indivisible and incomparable.
    • Prophethood: Muslims believe that Muhammad is the last in a line of prophets that includes Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus, among others.
    • Revelation: The Quran is considered the verbatim word of God, revealed to Muhammad through the angel Gabriel.
    • Angels: Belief in angels as messengers of God.
    • Day of Judgment: Belief in the afterlife, where deeds in this life will be judged.
    • Divine Decree: Everything good or bad is believed to be according to the will of God.
  • Practices: Known as the Five Pillars of Islam:
    • Shahada: Declaration of faith.
    • Salah: Prayer five times a day.
    • Zakat: Almsgiving, or giving to charity.
    • Sawm: Fasting during Ramadan.
    • Hajj: Pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in a lifetime if financially and physically able.
  • Definition: A Muslim is an adherent of Islam. The term “Muslim” means “one who submits to God.”
  • Identity: Being a Muslim involves both belief in the tenets of Islam and the practice of its rituals. However, the practice can vary widely due to cultural differences, personal interpretations, and levels of observance.
  • Diversity: Muslims are incredibly diverse, spanning different ethnicities, cultures, languages, and interpretations of Islamic teachings. This diversity means that what it means to be a Muslim can differ significantly from one individual or community to another.
  • Community: Muslims form a global community known as the Ummah, which transcends national boundaries, emphasizing a shared identity through faith.

Key Differences:

  • Concept vs. Practitioner: Islam is the religion, the set of beliefs, practices, and laws. A Muslim is someone who follows this religion. This is akin to Christianity and a Christian, or Judaism and a Jew.
  • Static vs. Dynamic: Islam, as a religion, can be seen as static in its foundational texts (Quran and Hadith), though interpretations evolve. Muslims, however, are dynamic, living entities whose practices, interpretations, and experiences of Islam can vary widely.
  • Universal vs. Individual: Islam provides a universal framework for belief and practice. However, how Muslims engage with this framework can be deeply personal or communal, influenced by culture, education, personal experiences, and regional practices.
  • Adherence: Not all who are culturally or ethnically identified as Muslim might practice Islam in the same way or at all. Conversely, someone who converts to Islam becomes a Muslim, regardless of their previous cultural or ethnic background.

Understanding this distinction helps in appreciating the complexity of religious identity and practice, where Islam provides the theological and practical framework, while Muslims are the diverse followers who interpret and live out this framework in myriad ways.

Can you be racist against a religion ?

The concept of being “racist against a religion” often arises from a misunderstanding or conflation of terms, but it touches on several nuanced points:

  1. Cultural Racism: While religion itself isn’t a race, religious practices are often deeply intertwined with cultural identity. For instance, Islamophobia might not target race directly but can manifest in racialised forms where people of certain ethnic backgrounds associated with Islam (like Middle Eastern or South Asian) face discrimination, even if they’re not Muslim. This is where cultural racism comes into play, where cultural markers (including religious ones) are used as proxies for racial discrimination.
  2. Stereotyping and Prejudice: Prejudice against followers of a religion can sometimes be expressed in ways that resemble racial prejudice. For example, assuming all Muslims are terrorists or all Jews are greedy are stereotypes that, while not inherently racial, function similarly by generalizing characteristics to a group based on their religious identity.
  3. Intersectionality: Religion often intersects with ethnicity or nationality. Discriminating against someone for being, say, a “Muslim” in a Western context, might actually be discrimination against their perceived ethnicity or cultural background, which is where the line between religious and racial discrimination blurs.
  4. Islamophobia as a Case Study: Islamophobia is often cited in discussions about racism against religion. While Islam is a religion, not a race, the term “Islamophobia” has been used to describe a range of negative attitudes and actions towards Muslims, which can include racial elements due to the association of Islam with certain racial or ethnic groups. Critics argue that labeling criticism of religious practices or doctrines as “racism” can sometimes be a misnomer, but it highlights how religious discrimination can take on racial overtones.
  5. Legal and Social Perspectives: From a legal standpoint, like in the U.S., discrimination based on religion is distinct from racial discrimination but can be equally unlawful under civil rights laws. However, societal perceptions might not always make this distinction clear, leading to behaviors that might be labeled as racist even if they’re primarily motivated by religious bias.
  6. Public Discourse and Media: Media portrayal and public discourse often fail to differentiate between cultural, religious, and racial identities, leading to a conflation where criticism or discrimination against religious practices might be perceived or presented as racial prejudice.
  7. Theological vs. Racial Criticism: There’s a valid distinction between criticizing religious doctrines or practices (theological critique) and making derogatory generalizations about people based on their religion in a way that mirrors racial slurs or stereotypes (which could be seen as akin to racism due to its broad, unfair generalization).

In essence, while religion and race are different, the discrimination or prejudice against someone based on their religion can sometimes mimic racism in its effects, especially when religious identity is closely tied to cultural or ethnic identity. This doesn’t make religion a race, but it shows how discrimination can operate across these lines, leading to debates about what constitutes “racism” when religious groups are targeted. The term “racism” might be misapplied in these contexts, but it underscores the complexity of identity where religion, culture, and ethnicity intersect.

Racist and Religious Hate Crime

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) have published the Racist and Religious Hate Crime – Prosecution Guidance which assists their prosecutors when they are making decisions about cases. It is regularly updated to reflect changes in law and practice.

“Using threatening, abusive or insulting language to rile up racism online is unacceptable and is breaking the law……It is not an offence to have strong or differing political views, but it is an offence to incite racial hatred”

Frank Ferguson, Head of the Crown Prosecution Service’s Special Crime and Counter Terrorism Unit

Check out our related articles on Rule of Law, Open Justice, Innocent until Proven Guilty and the highly questionable Sussex Family Justice Board.

The Ministry of Injustice is not the Ministry of Justice nor is it affiliated in any way with the justice system, legal profession or any law enforcement agencies.


Most Popular

What is Policing by Consent ? What is Two Tier Policing ?

Latest Articles

All Articles can be found in the Legal Blog or Sitemap.


You should always seek formal legal advice from a qualified and reputable lawyer (solicitor or barrister).

‘Justice delayed is justice denied’

 William Ewart Gladstone

There are a number of links to Free and Paid For Legal Resources and Legal Organisations on the Free Legal Advice , Legal Aid and Pro Bono pages.

Equal Justice Under Law
Access To Justice Is A Right Not A Privilege
Rule of Law - Open Justice - Policing By Consent

Ministry of Injustice - Server Monitor