Dom Watts founded the Ministry of Injustice in July 2021. Dom is an IT Professional with 30+ years experience in Tier 1 Banking, Government, Defence, Healthcare and Global Blue Chips. Dom has no legal training and is not a lawyer but has previously consulted for a Magic Circle Law Firm. You can find Dom on X or Google.
Section 4a of The Limitation Act 1980 defines the time limit for actions for defamation or malicious falsehood as one year from the date on which the cause of action accrued.
The Computer Misuse Act 1990 (CMA) is a UK law that was introduced in 1990 to address the issue of computer-related crime. The law is designed to protect computer users and systems from unauthorised access, hacking, and other forms of cybercrime.
In this article, we will explore the Computer Misuse Act in more detail, including its key provisions, penalties for breaking the law, and notable cases where the act has been enforced.
Key Provisions of the Computer Misuse Act
The Computer Misuse Act contains three main sections that outline offenses related to unauthorised access, unauthorised modification of computer material, and unauthorised access with intent to commit or facilitate a crime.
Section 1: Unauthorized access to computer material
Section 1 of the CMA makes it an offense to gain unauthorised access to any computer material. This includes accessing data or systems without permission, as well as using any unauthorised method to gain access to a computer.
Section 2: Unauthorized access with intent to commit or facilitate a crime
Section 2 of the CMA makes it an offense to gain unauthorised access to a computer with the intention of committing or facilitating a crime. This could include stealing data, distributing viruses or malware, or using a computer to commit fraud.
Section 3: Unauthorized modification of computer material
Section 3 of the CMA makes it an offense to modify or destroy computer material without authorization. This could include deleting files, changing data, or introducing malware.
Penalties for Breaking the Law
The penalties for breaking the Computer Misuse Act vary depending on the severity of the offense. For less serious offenses, the maximum penalty is a fine or up to two years in prison.
For more serious offenses, such as those involving significant financial loss or damage, the maximum penalty is ten years in prison.
Notable Cases
Over the years, there have been several notable cases where the Computer Misuse Act has been enforced. In 2018, a teenager was sentenced to two years in prison for his role in the Mirai botnet attack. The attack, which used hundreds of thousands of compromised Internet of Things devices, caused significant disruption to websites and services around the world.
In 2015, a man was sentenced to two years in prison for hacking into the US Department of Defense’s computer system. The man, who was based in the UK, used a technique called “SQL injection” to gain unauthorised access to the system.
Summary
The Computer Misuse Act is an important law that helps to protect computer users and systems from cybercrime. The act contains several provisions that make it illegal to gain unauthorized access to computer systems or data, modify computer material without authorization, or use a computer to commit a crime.
Penalties for breaking the law range from fines to prison sentences, depending on the severity of the offense.
The Computer Misuse Act has been used in several high-profile cases over the years, highlighting the importance of strong laws to combat cybercrime.
The Ministry of Injustice was attacked on the 14th March 2023 from outside of the UK and the jurisdiction of the Computer Misuse Act 1990. Better luck next time.
Forensic science is a cornerstone of modern criminal justice, providing critical evidence that can make or break a case. However, the reliability and accuracy of… Read more: What is the Forensic Science Regulator ?
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands as a vital institution within the criminal justice system, dedicated to investigating potential miscarriages of justice. Established in… Read more: What is the Criminal Cases Review Commission ?
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) undertake regular surveys to assess the public’s perceptions of the police, as well as their confidence in the… Read more: Police Public Confidence and Engagement
“Fox and Sons Crawley has been established in the area for years. We love helping our customers to sell, let, buy and rent, We sell and let all types of properties in Crawley and the surrounding areas including Horley, Horsham, Copthorne, Rusper, Turners Hill and Pease Pottage.
Rebecca Collins is the Senior Branch Manager with many years of experience within estate agency and a proven track record for success. He has personally been responsible for finding buyers their dream home and finding our sellers the right quality buyer to help them get moved….”
Forensic science is a cornerstone of modern criminal justice, providing critical evidence that can make or break a case. However, the reliability and accuracy of… Read more: What is the Forensic Science Regulator ?
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands as a vital institution within the criminal justice system, dedicated to investigating potential miscarriages of justice. Established in… Read more: What is the Criminal Cases Review Commission ?
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) undertake regular surveys to assess the public’s perceptions of the police, as well as their confidence in the… Read more: Police Public Confidence and Engagement
Insolvency is a term that is commonly used in the UK to refer to a financial state where an individual or business is unable to pay its debts as they fall due. In such a scenario, the individual or company is said to be insolvent.
In the UK, the Insolvency Act 1986 is the primary legislation that governs the insolvency process. The Act sets out the legal framework for the administration of insolvent estates, the distribution of assets to creditors, and the discharge of debts.
Insolvency lawyers are legal professionals who specialise in advising individuals and businesses on matters related to insolvency. These lawyers work closely with their clients to help them navigate the complex legal and financial issues that arise during the insolvency process.
Insolvency lawyers are highly skilled in negotiating with creditors and other stakeholders to find a workable solution that maximizes the value of the insolvent estate and minimizes the impact on the debtor’s financial future.
The Insolvency Act of 1986
The Insolvency Act of 1986 is a comprehensive piece of legislation that provides a framework for the administration of insolvency proceedings in the UK. The Act applies to individuals, partnerships, and companies and sets out the rules for the management of insolvent estates, including the appointment of insolvency practitioners, the liquidation of assets, and the distribution of proceeds to creditors.
Under the Insolvency Act, there are several different types of insolvency proceedings that can be initiated, depending on the specific circumstances of the debtor. These include:
Bankruptcy – Bankruptcy is a legal process that applies to individuals who are unable to pay their debts. Bankruptcy proceedings are initiated by the debtor or by one of their creditors, and once the bankruptcy order is made, the debtor’s assets are liquidated to pay off their creditors.
Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) – A CVA is a formal agreement between a company and its creditors that allows the company to pay off its debts over a period of time. The terms of the agreement are negotiated between the company and its creditors, and once agreed, the CVA is overseen by a licensed insolvency practitioner.
Administration – Administration is a legal process that allows a company to be restructured and continue to trade while insolvent. An administrator is appointed to oversee the process and work with the company’s directors to find a viable solution to the company’s financial difficulties.
Liquidation – Liquidation is a process that involves the sale of a company’s assets to pay off its debts. Liquidation can be initiated voluntarily by the company’s directors or by a court order.
The Enterprise Act of 2002
The Enterprise Act 2002 introduced significant changes to the insolvency regime in the UK. The Act aimed to promote a culture of enterprise and entrepreneurship by making it easier for businesses to recover from financial difficulties and to encourage a more proactive approach to financial management.
One of the key changes introduced by the Enterprise Act was the introduction of the administration process. This process allows a company to be placed in administration and continue to trade while a solution is found to its financial difficulties. The Act also introduced new rules around the treatment of secured creditors, making it easier for them to recover their debts in certain circumstances.
The Insolvency Service
The Insolvency Service is a government agency that is responsible for overseeing the insolvency process in the UK. The Service is responsible for the administration of bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings, the registration of insolvency practitioners, and the investigation of fraudulent or wrongful trading by company directors.
The Service also provides information and guidance to individuals and businesses on matters related to insolvency, including the options available to them when they are facing financial difficulties. The Service is committed to promoting a culture of entrepreneurship and financial responsibility and works closely with other government agencies, industry bodies, and stakeholders to achieve this goal.
Insolvency Lawyers in the UK
Insolvency lawyers are legal professionals who specialise in advising individuals and businesses on matters related to insolvency. They have a deep understanding of the legal and financial issues that arise during the insolvency process and work closely with their clients to find a workable solution that meets their needs and objectives.
Insolvency lawyers in the UK are regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), which sets the standards for professional conduct and ethics. To practice as an insolvency lawyer in the UK, individuals must be qualified solicitors and have completed a specialist insolvency training program.
Insolvency lawyers provide a wide range of services to their clients, including:
Advising on the options available to individuals and businesses facing financial difficulties, including bankruptcy, CVA, administration, and liquidation.
Representing clients in negotiations with creditors and other stakeholders to find a workable solution to their financial difficulties.
Advising on the legal and financial implications of insolvency proceedings and helping clients to understand their rights and obligations.
Acting as insolvency practitioners, where appropriate, to oversee the administration of insolvent estates and ensure that the interests of creditors are protected.
Representing clients in court proceedings related to insolvency, including bankruptcy petitions, winding-up orders, and creditor disputes.
Conclusion
Insolvency is a complex area of law that requires specialist knowledge and expertise. The Insolvency Act of 1986 and the Enterprise Act of 2002 provide the legal framework for the administration of insolvency proceedings in the UK, and the Insolvency Service is responsible for overseeing the process.
Insolvency lawyers play a critical role in the insolvency process, advising individuals and businesses on their options when facing financial difficulties and working with them to find a workable solution that meets their needs and objectives. They are highly skilled in negotiating with creditors and other stakeholders and have a deep understanding of the legal and financial issues that arise during the insolvency process.
If you are facing financial difficulties and are unsure of your options, it is essential to seek the advice of an experienced insolvency lawyer. They can provide you with the guidance and support you need to navigate the complex insolvency process and protect your interests.
Forensic science is a cornerstone of modern criminal justice, providing critical evidence that can make or break a case. However, the reliability and accuracy of… Read more: What is the Forensic Science Regulator ?
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands as a vital institution within the criminal justice system, dedicated to investigating potential miscarriages of justice. Established in… Read more: What is the Criminal Cases Review Commission ?
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) undertake regular surveys to assess the public’s perceptions of the police, as well as their confidence in the… Read more: Police Public Confidence and Engagement
Legal issues can arise in many different areas of our lives, from employment disputes to family law matters, and it can be challenging to know where to turn for help. Fortunately, in the UK, there are many resources available to individuals seeking free legal advice and assistance.
One of the most well-known sources of free legal advice in the UK is Citizens Advice. Citizens Advice is a network of over 300 independent charities that provide free, confidential, and impartial advice to individuals on a range of issues, including debt, housing, employment, and benefits. Citizens Advice provides advice through face-to-face appointments, over the phone, and online.
Another resource for free legal advice in the UK is the Law Centres Network. Law Centres are independent, not-for-profit legal practices that provide free legal advice and representation to individuals and communities who would otherwise be unable to access legal services. There are currently over 40 Law Centres across the UK, and they provide services on a range of issues, including housing, employment, immigration, and welfare benefits.
For individuals seeking advice on a specific area of law, there are also a number of specialist legal advice organisations in the UK. For example, the Free Representation Unit (FRU) provides free representation in employment tribunals and social security appeals, while the Personal Support Unit provides support and assistance to individuals representing themselves in court.
It is worth noting, however, that while free legal advice can be incredibly helpful, it may not always be sufficient to resolve a legal issue. In some cases, professional legal advice and representation may be necessary. This is particularly true for complex legal matters or those that involve significant financial or personal stakes.
For those who require professional legal advice, there are a number of options available. One option is to seek the assistance of a solicitor or barrister.
Solicitors are legal professionals who provide advice and assistance on a wide range of legal issues, while barristers are specialist advocates who provide representation in court.
Both solicitors and barristers are regulated by professional bodies, and it is important to ensure that any legal professional you engage is appropriately qualified and regulated.
However, it is important to note that solicitors and barristers can be expensive, and not everyone can afford to pay for their services. In these cases, there are a number of options available for obtaining legal advice and representation on a pro bono or low-cost basis.
The LawWorks network, for example, provides free legal advice and assistance to individuals and community groups who cannot afford to pay for legal services. The network consists of over 200 law firms and barristers’ chambers who provide their services for free or at a reduced cost.
Another option for obtaining low-cost legal advice is to use a legal advice clinic. Legal advice clinics are run by law schools and universities, and provide free or low-cost legal advice and assistance to members of the public. These clinics are staffed by law students under the supervision of qualified lawyers, and can provide advice on a wide range of legal issues.
In addition to these options, there are also a number of charities and organisations that provide free legal advice and assistance on specific issues. For example, the National Centre for Domestic Violence provides free legal assistance to victims of domestic violence, while the Refugee Council provides legal advice and assistance to refugees and asylum seekers.
There are many resources available to individuals seeking free legal advice and assistance in the UK. While professional legal advice may be necessary in some cases, it is important to explore all available options before engaging the services of a solicitor or barrister. By taking advantage of the many free and low-cost resources available, individuals can ensure that they are able to access the legal advice and assistance they need to address their legal issues.
It is important to note that some of the resources mentioned above may have specific eligibility criteria, and it is important to check these before seeking assistance. For example, some Law Centres may only provide assistance to individuals who live in a particular area or who meet certain income criteria.
While it is important to seek professional legal advice in some cases, there are many resources available for individuals seeking free or low-cost legal advice and assistance in the UK. By taking advantage of these resources, individuals can ensure that they are able to access the legal advice and assistance they need to address their legal issues.
Legal aid is a government-funded program that provides financial assistance to individuals who cannot afford legal representation in court. In the United Kingdom, legal aid is administered by the Legal Aid Agency, which is an executive agency of the Ministry of Justice.
Forensic science is a cornerstone of modern criminal justice, providing critical evidence that can make or break a case. However, the reliability and accuracy of… Read more: What is the Forensic Science Regulator ?
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands as a vital institution within the criminal justice system, dedicated to investigating potential miscarriages of justice. Established in… Read more: What is the Criminal Cases Review Commission ?
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) undertake regular surveys to assess the public’s perceptions of the police, as well as their confidence in the… Read more: Police Public Confidence and Engagement
Debt Collectors and Bailiffs are both related to the process of collecting debts from individuals and businesses that owe money to creditors.
In the UK, a debt collector is a person or company who is hired by a creditor to recover money that is owed to them by a debtor. Debt collectors may work directly for the creditor or may be hired by a third-party debt collection agency.
Debt collectors use various methods to try to recover the money owed, such as making phone calls, sending letters, and visiting the debtor’s home or workplace. They may also use legal means, such as taking the debtor to court or applying for a County Court Judgment (CCJ) against them.
However, it’s important to note that debt collectors must follow strict rules and regulations set out by law when collecting debts. For example, they must not use aggressive or threatening behaviour, must not contact debtors at unreasonable times, and must not discuss the debt with anyone other than the debtor or their representative.
A debt collector doesn’t have any special legal powers to collect a debt, whereas a bailiff does.
Bailiffs are individuals who are authorized to enforce the collection of debts by seizing goods or assets owned by the debtor, while debt collection is a process by which creditors attempt to recover the money owed to them by the debtor.
Bailiffs, also known as enforcement agents, are appointed by the courts to enforce judgments and orders made against debtors. They are usually employed by debt collection agencies or private companies, and their primary role is to recover debts owed to creditors.
Bailiffs have the legal power to enter a debtor’s property and seize goods or assets in order to satisfy the debt owed. They can also take control of the debtor’s vehicle or other assets that are held on a public highway.
The use of bailiffs to collect debts is governed by various laws and regulations in the UK. The main legislation that covers the use of bailiffs is the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, which sets out the rules and procedures that bailiffs must follow when enforcing debts. Under this legislation, bailiffs are required to give a debtor at least seven days’ notice before attending their property to seize goods. They are also required to provide proof of their identity and authority, and they must provide a full inventory of any goods that are seized.
Another important aspect of debt collection in the UK is the use of Individual Voluntary Arrangements (IVAs). An IVA is a formal agreement between a debtor and their creditors that allows the debtor to repay their debts over a set period of time. IVAs are typically used by individuals who are unable to repay their debts in full and who want to avoid bankruptcy.
The process of setting up an IVA usually involves the services of a solicitor, who will work with the debtor and their creditors to negotiate a repayment plan that is affordable for the debtor.
Solicitors play a key role in the debt collection process in the UK, particularly when it comes to the use of IVAs. They are legal professionals who specialize in advising clients on matters related to debt collection and other legal issues.
Solicitors can help debtors to negotiate with their creditors, and they can also provide legal advice on the various debt relief options that are available.
In addition to the legislation that governs the use of bailiffs, there are also a number of other laws and regulations in the UK that are designed to protect debtors from unfair practices.
These include the Consumer Credit Act 1974, which sets out the rules that creditors must follow when lending money to consumers, and the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) rules on debt collection, which are designed to ensure that creditors and debt collection agencies treat debtors fairly and transparently.
One of the key rules set out by the FCA is that creditors and debt collection agencies must treat debtors with respect and dignity, and they must not use aggressive or threatening behavior to collect debts. They are also required to provide debtors with clear information about the debts they owe, including the amount owed, the interest rate, and any fees or charges that apply. Debtors have the right to challenge the amount of the debt if they believe it is incorrect, and they can also request a payment plan if they are unable to pay the debt in full.
In conclusion, bailiffs and debt collection are two important aspects of the process of collecting debts in the UK. Bailiffs are authorized to enforce the collection of debts by seizing goods or assets owned by the debtor, while debt collection is a process by which creditors attempt to recover the money owed to them by the debtor. The use of bailiffs to collect debts is governed by various laws and regulations, including the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, which sets out the rules and procedures that bailiffs must follow when enforcing debts. Solicitors and Individual Voluntary Arrangements (IVAs) also play a key role in debt collection, particularly when it comes to negotiating repayment plans with creditors.
There are also a number of laws and regulations in the UK that are designed to protect debtors from unfair practices during the debt collection process. These laws include the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) rules on debt collection.
Under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, creditors are required to provide debtors with clear information about the debts they owe, including the amount owed, the interest rate, and any fees or charges that apply. Debtors also have the right to challenge the amount of the debt if they believe it is incorrect.
The FCA’s rules on debt collection are designed to ensure that creditors and debt collection agencies treat debtors fairly and transparently. They must not use aggressive or threatening behaviour to collect debts and must provide debtors with clear information about their rights and options for repayment.
If a debtor is unable to repay their debts and is facing legal action, they may be able to seek help from a solicitor or debt advice service. These services can provide advice on the various debt relief options that are available, including IVAs, debt management plans, and bankruptcy.
Overall, while debt collection can be a stressful and difficult process for both debtors and creditors, there are laws and regulations in place in the UK to ensure that it is carried out fairly and transparently.
Bailiffs and solicitors play important roles in this process, and debtors have a range of options available to them if they are struggling to repay their debts.
By working together and following the rules and procedures set out by the law, debtors and creditors can hopefully reach a satisfactory resolution to the debt collection process.
Forensic science is a cornerstone of modern criminal justice, providing critical evidence that can make or break a case. However, the reliability and accuracy of… Read more: What is the Forensic Science Regulator ?
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands as a vital institution within the criminal justice system, dedicated to investigating potential miscarriages of justice. Established in… Read more: What is the Criminal Cases Review Commission ?
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) undertake regular surveys to assess the public’s perceptions of the police, as well as their confidence in the… Read more: Police Public Confidence and Engagement
A County Court Judgment (CCJ) is a legal order issued by a county court in England, Wales, or Northern Ireland against someone who owes money to a creditor.
It is a common way for creditors to take legal action against debtors who have not paid their debts. A CCJ can have serious consequences for the debtor, including damage to their credit score and ability to obtain credit in the future.
Apply for a CCJ using an N1 Claim form
A creditor can apply for a CCJ against a debtor if they have been unable to recover their debt through other means, such as sending reminders, issuing a default notice, or using a debt collection agency.
To apply for a CCJ, the creditor must fill out a N1 claim form (Make a claim against a person or organisation (Claim form CPR Part 7) and submit it to the court, along with the court fee.
The court will then send a copy of the claim form to the debtor, who will have the opportunity to respond within 14 days.
If the debtor does not respond within 14 days, the court will assume that they have admitted to the debt and will issue a CCJ. If the debtor does respond, the court will review the case and may schedule a hearing to determine whether a CCJ should be issued.
Once a CCJ is issued, it will be recorded in the Register of Judgments, Orders, and Fines, which is maintained by the Registry Trust. This means that the CCJ will appear on the debtor’s credit report for six years, even if they pay the debt in full. This can have a significant impact on the debtor’s ability to obtain credit in the future, as lenders are likely to view the CCJ as evidence that the debtor is a higher credit risk.
Money Claim Online
Money Claim Online (MCOL) is a service provided by His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) in England and Wales that allows individuals and businesses to make and respond to claims for money owed online. It is a fast and convenient way to resolve disputes and recover debts without the need to attend a court hearing.
MCOL allows individuals and businesses to initiate a claim for money owed by filling out an online form and paying a fee. The system will then generate a claim form and send it to the defendant, who will have 14 days to respond. If the defendant does not respond within 14 days, a judgment can be entered against them.
If the defendant disputes the claim, the case may proceed to a court hearing. However, in many cases, disputes can be resolved without the need for a hearing, through negotiation or mediation.
MCOL is designed to be easy to use and accessible to everyone, regardless of their level of legal knowledge or experience. It is also cost-effective, as it eliminates the need for individuals and businesses to pay legal fees and attend court hearings.
To use MCOL, individuals and businesses must register for an account on the HMCTS website and follow the instructions provided. It is important to ensure that all the details entered on the claim form are accurate and complete, as any errors could result in the claim being rejected or delayed.
Money Claim Online (MCOL) is a service provided by HMCTS that allows individuals and businesses to make and respond to claims for money owed online. It is a fast, convenient, and cost-effective way to resolve disputes and recover debts, without the need to attend a court hearing.
Consequences of a County Court Judgment
In addition to damaging the debtor’s credit score, a CCJ can also have other consequences. For example, the creditor may be able to use bailiffs to seize the debtor’s possessions in order to recover the debt. They may also be able to apply for an attachment of earnings order, which means that the debtor’s employer will be required to deduct money from their wages to pay off the debt.
If a CCJ is issued against a person, it is important that they take action to address the debt as soon as possible. One option is to pay the debt in full, which will result in the CCJ being marked as satisfied on the debtor’s credit report. However, if the debtor is unable to pay the debt in full, they may be able to negotiate a payment plan with the creditor or apply to the court to have the CCJ set aside.
Setting aside a CCJ
If a person believes that a CCJ has been issued against them unfairly, they may be able to apply to have the CCJ set aside. This means that the CCJ will be cancelled and the case will be reopened. To apply to have a CCJ set aside, the debtor must fill out an application form and submit it to the court, along with any supporting evidence.
There are several reasons why a CCJ may be set aside, including:
The debtor did not receive the original claim form.
The debtor has a valid defence to the claim.
The creditor did not follow the correct procedures when applying for the CCJ.
It is important to note that setting aside a CCJ can be a complex and time-consuming process, and it is recommended that the debtor seeks legal advice from a solicitor or other legal professional before taking this step.
Conclusion
A County Court Judgment (CCJ) is a legal order issued by a county court against someone who owes money to a creditor. CCJs can have serious consequences for the debtor, including damage to their credit score and ability to obtain credit in the future. If a CCJ is issued against a person, it is important that they take action to address the debt as soon as possible, including negotiating a payment plan with the creditor or applying to have the CCJ set aside. It is also important to understand the procedures for issuing a CCJ and the potential consequences of not paying debts on time.
If you have a CCJ against you, it is important to take steps to address the debt as soon as possible. This may involve negotiating a payment plan with the creditor or seeking legal advice to have the CCJ set aside. It is also important to be aware of the impact of a CCJ on your credit report and to take steps to rebuild your credit score over time.
CCJ Resources
There are a number of resources available to help individuals understand and address CCJ’s. These include:
The Money and Pension Service, which provides free advice and guidance on managing debt and dealing with CCJs.
The Registry Trust, which maintains the Register of Judgments, Orders, and Fines and provides information on how to access this register.
The Citizens Advice Bureau, which provides free legal advice and guidance on a range of issues, including CCJs and debt management.
Credit reference agencies, such as Experian and Equifax which provide information on credit reports and how to manage credit scores.
Clearscore – Your credit score and report. For free, forever.
Forensic science is a cornerstone of modern criminal justice, providing critical evidence that can make or break a case. However, the reliability and accuracy of… Read more: What is the Forensic Science Regulator ?
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands as a vital institution within the criminal justice system, dedicated to investigating potential miscarriages of justice. Established in… Read more: What is the Criminal Cases Review Commission ?
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) undertake regular surveys to assess the public’s perceptions of the police, as well as their confidence in the… Read more: Police Public Confidence and Engagement
The Family Court and Family Justice System in England and Wales is responsible for resolving a wide range of family disputes and providing solutions to the most complex and sensitive issues that can arise between family members. The system is designed to protect the welfare of children and provide a fair and just resolution for all parties involved.
What is the Family Court and Family Justice System?
The Family Court is a division of the court system in England and Wales that deals exclusively with family law matters. It has jurisdiction over a wide range of cases, including divorce, child custody, adoption, domestic violence, and child protection.
The Family Justice System is a broader term that refers to the entire network of agencies and professionals involved in resolving family disputes, including the Family Court, social services, mediation services, and the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS).
When and how was the Family Court founded?
The Family Court was created in 2014 as part of a major overhaul of the family justice system in England and Wales as a result of the Children and Families Act 2014.
The aim of the reform was to consolidate the existing family courts, which were previously known as the Family Proceedings Court, County Court, and High Court, into a single unified court. The new court would handle all family law cases and provide a simpler, more streamlined process for families in crisis.
The creation of the Family Court brought all family law cases under one roof, and provided a consistent and specialist approach to resolving family disputes. The court is led by a designated family judge, who has expertise in family law and is responsible for overseeing all family cases in the court.
By what authority do the Family Court exist ?
The Family Court is a statutory court, meaning it has been established by an Act of Parliament. The court is governed by the Family Procedure Rules, which set out the procedures and rules that must be followed in family law cases.
The Family Justice System operates under a range of legislation, including the Children Act 1989, the Children and Families Act 2014, the Family Law Act 1996, and the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.
What are Family Judges ?
“When disputes need to be decided by the Family Court, depending on the type of case, they are dealt with by either Family Panel Lay Magistrates or District Judge (Magistrates’ court) or by a District, Circuit or High Court Judge.
Family magistrates and Family judges are specially trained by the Judicial College to deal with issues affecting families, including training on domestic abuse and coercive and controlling behaviour. They receive regular updating training to ensure their expertise in family law remains up to date.”
The Family Court process can vary depending on the type of case being heard, but generally involves the following stages:
Pre-proceedings: This is where social services become involved in a family’s life due to concerns about the welfare of a child. At this stage, efforts are made to address the issues and prevent the need for court proceedings.
Mediation: Mediation is often recommended as a way to resolve family disputes without the need for court proceedings. This involves a neutral third party who helps the parties to reach an agreement.
Application: If mediation is unsuccessful or not appropriate, one or both parties may apply to the court for an order. This involves completing an application form and paying a fee.
First hearing: The first hearing is an opportunity for the court to consider the issues and decide what further steps are necessary. This may include the appointment of a CAFCASS officer, who will carry out an assessment of the child’s welfare.
Further hearings: Depending on the nature of the case, there may be further hearings to consider evidence and make decisions. This may involve the appointment of expert witnesses, such as psychologists or social workers.
Final hearing: The final hearing is where the court makes a final decision about the case. This may involve the making of a court order, which sets out what should happen next.
“The family justice system exists to help families resolve disputes arising in respect of family matters quickly and with the minimum of disruption to those involved.“
The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service CAFCASS is an independent organization that provides advice to the family court on matters relating to children and families. Its role is to ensure that the best interests of the child are taken into account when decisions are being made by the court. CAFCASS officers work with families to gather information about the child’s circumstances and make recommendations to the court on issues such as custody and access.
CAFCASS officers may also be asked to prepare a report for the court, known as a Section 7 report. This report provides the court with an assessment of the child’s needs and the factors that should be taken into account when making decisions about custody and access.
Family Law Legislation
There have been a number of key pieces of legislation that have shaped the family justice system in England and Wales. These include:
The Children Act 1989: This act sets out the legal framework for the protection and welfare of children in England and Wales. It established the principle that the best interests of the child should be the primary consideration in all decisions made by the court.
The Family Law Act 1996: This act introduced significant changes to the family justice system, including the establishment of the family court and the introduction of new measures to promote non-court-based dispute resolution such as mediation.
The Adoption and Children Act 2002: This act introduced significant changes to adoption law in England and Wales, including the creation of the Adoption and Children Act Register and new provisions for step-parent adoption.
The Children and Families Act 2014: This act introduced a range of reforms to the family justice system, including changes to the law on child arrangements, the introduction of a 26-week time limit for care proceedings, and the requirement for separating parents to attend mediation before making an application to the court.
Family Solicitors and Family Barristers
A family solicitor is a qualified legal practitioner in family law responsible for preparing legal documentation, representing and/or defending a client’s legal interests.
Family barristers are qualified legal professionals in family law who specialise in advocacy and litigation.
The family court and family justice system in England and Wales play a vital role in resolving disputes between family members and promoting the best interests of children.
While the process can be complex and stressful, the system is designed to be child-focused and to provide a fair and impartial process for all parties involved.
The key legislation that governs the family justice
Dodgy JudgesJustice SystemAuditing BritainSussex Police and the High SheriffThe Secret BarristerBar Standards Board Justice
Forensic science is a cornerstone of modern criminal justice, providing critical evidence that can make or break a case. However, the reliability and accuracy of… Read more: What is the Forensic Science Regulator ?
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands as a vital institution within the criminal justice system, dedicated to investigating potential miscarriages of justice. Established in… Read more: What is the Criminal Cases Review Commission ?
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) undertake regular surveys to assess the public’s perceptions of the police, as well as their confidence in the… Read more: Police Public Confidence and Engagement
A Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) is a legal document that allows an individual to appoint someone to make decisions on their behalf in case they lose mental capacity. The LPA is a powerful tool that provides peace of mind and ensures that the individual’s wishes are respected even when they are unable to express them.
In this article, we will explore the basics of LPA in the UK, including how to apply and relevant links and references.
What is an LPA?
An LPA is a legal document that allows an individual (known as the “donor”) to appoint one or more people (known as “attorneys”) to make decisions on their behalf in case they lose mental capacity. There are two types of LPA:
Property and Financial Affairs LPA: This type of LPA allows the appointed attorney(s) to manage the donor’s finances, such as paying bills, selling property, or making investments.
Health and Welfare LPA: This type of LPA allows the appointed attorney(s) to make decisions about the donor’s health and welfare, such as medical treatment, where they live, and their daily routine.
It is important to note that the LPA can only be used once it has been registered with the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG).
Who can make an LPA?
Any person aged 18 or over who has the mental capacity to understand the nature and scope of the LPA can make one. It is important to make an LPA as soon as possible as it cannot be made once an individual has lost mental capacity.
How to apply for an LPA?
The process of applying for an LPA involves several steps, which are:
Choosing an attorney: The donor must choose one or more individuals to act as their attorney(s). It is important to choose someone who is trustworthy and has the skills to manage the donor’s affairs.
Completing the LPA form: The LPA form is available online from the UK government’s website or can be obtained from a legal advisor. The form must be completed with the donor’s details and signed by both the donor and the attorney(s). The form must also be signed by a certificate provider, who confirms that the donor has the mental capacity to make an LPA.
Registering the LPA: The completed LPA form must be sent to the OPG for registration. The registration fee is £82 per LPA.
Using the LPA: Once the LPA is registered, it can be used by the attorney(s) if the donor loses mental capacity.
It is important to note that the process of applying for an LPA can take several weeks, so it is advisable to start the process as soon as possible.
Web links and references
The UK government’s website provides comprehensive information on LPAs, including the LPA forms and guidance on how to complete them. The website also provides information on how to choose an attorney, how to register an LPA, and how to use it. The website can be accessed at https://www.gov.uk/power-of-attorney.
The Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) is responsible for registering LPAs in the UK. The OPG’s website provides information on how to register an LPA, the fees involved, and how to contact them. The website can be accessed at https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/office-of-the-public-guardian.
In summary, an LPA is a powerful tool that allows an individual to appoint someone to make decisions on their behalf in case they lose mental capacity. The process of applying for an LPA involves several steps, including choosing an attorney, completing the LPA form, registering the LPA, and using the LPA. The UK government’s website and the Office of the Public Guardian’s website provide comprehensive information on LPAs and can be used as valuable resources when applying for an LPA.
It is important to note that an LPA can be amended or cancelled at any time by the donor, as long as they still have mental capacity. If the donor loses mental capacity and has not made an LPA, then decisions about their welfare and finances may be made by the court of protection or a deputy appointed by the court. This can be a lengthy and costly process, which is why it is important to make an LPA as soon as possible.
In addition to LPAs, there are also Advance Decisions, which allow an individual to make decisions about their future medical treatment in case they lose mental capacity. Advance Decisions can be used to refuse treatment or to request specific treatments. It is important to note that Advance Decisions are legally binding and can be used to refuse life-sustaining treatment. More information about Advance Decisions can be found on the UK government’s website.
In conclusion, an LPA is a crucial legal document that allows an individual to appoint someone to make decisions on their behalf in case they lose mental capacity. The process of applying for an LPA involves choosing an attorney, completing the LPA form, registering the LPA, and using the LPA. The UK government’s website and the Office of the Public Guardian’s website provide valuable resources and information about LPAs, which can be used as references when applying for an LPA.
Forensic science is a cornerstone of modern criminal justice, providing critical evidence that can make or break a case. However, the reliability and accuracy of… Read more: What is the Forensic Science Regulator ?
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands as a vital institution within the criminal justice system, dedicated to investigating potential miscarriages of justice. Established in… Read more: What is the Criminal Cases Review Commission ?
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) undertake regular surveys to assess the public’s perceptions of the police, as well as their confidence in the… Read more: Police Public Confidence and Engagement
Family law is an area of law that deals with legal issues arising from family relationships, such as divorce, child custody, child support, adoption, and other matters related to family dynamics.
In the UK, mediation is an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process that can be used in family law cases to resolve disputes outside of court. In this article, we will explore the benefits and disadvantages of mediating family law disputes in the UK and how ADR fits into the UK legal system.
Mediation is a form of dispute resolution where parties to a dispute work with a neutral third party, called a mediator, to reach a mutually acceptable agreement. The process is voluntary, confidential, and flexible. Parties can agree on any solution that works for them, and the mediator helps them to craft an agreement that meets their needs and interests.
Mediators are not all regulated and their activities are not controlled in any way. Anyone can call themselves a mediator although some mediators do have professional qualifications.
One of the benefits of mediation in family law disputes in the UK is that it can be less expensive than going to court. Litigation can be costly, with legal fees, court costs, and other expenses adding up quickly. Mediation can often be completed in a few sessions, which can save parties time and money.
Another benefit of mediation is that it can be less adversarial than going to court. Family law disputes can be emotionally charged, and litigation can exacerbate tensions between parties. Mediation provides a safe and structured environment for parties to express their concerns and work towards a resolution. The mediator can help to defuse conflicts and keep the conversation focused on problem-solving.
Mediation can also be less time-consuming than going to court in the UK. Litigation can take months or even years to resolve, depending on the complexity of the case and the court’s schedule. Mediation can often be completed in a few sessions, which can be scheduled at times that are convenient for the parties.
Mediation can be less formal than going to court. In court, parties must follow strict rules of procedure and evidence. Mediation allows parties to have more control over the process and to craft a solution that works for them. Parties can be creative in their solutions and are not bound by legal precedent or strict rules of evidence.
Mediation can also be a more private and confidential process than going to court. Court proceedings are open to the public, and court records can be accessed by anyone. Mediation is a confidential process, and the mediator cannot disclose what is said in the sessions without the parties’ consent.
Despite these benefits, there are also some disadvantages to mediating family law disputes in the UK.
One disadvantage is that the mediator cannot impose a decision on the parties. Unlike a judge, the mediator does not have the power to make a ruling that is legally binding. If parties cannot reach an agreement in mediation, they may still need to go to court to resolve their dispute.
Another disadvantage of mediation in the UK is that parties may not have access to legal advice during the process. While parties can consult with attorneys outside of the mediation sessions, they may not have their attorney present during the mediation itself. This can put parties at a disadvantage if they are not familiar with the law or the UK legal system.
Mediation also requires a certain level of cooperation between the parties. If one party is unwilling to participate in mediation or is uncooperative during the process, mediation may not be successful. In such cases, parties may need to resort to litigation to resolve their dispute.
In addition to traditional mediation, there are several other types of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) that can be used in UK law disputes. These include arbitration, collaborative law, and negotiation.
Arbitration is a process where parties to a dispute present their case to a neutral third party, called an arbitrator, who makes a legally binding decision. Like mediation, arbitration can be less expensive and less formal than going to court. However, the arbitrator’s decision is final and legally binding, which means parties may lose their right to appeal or challenge the decision.
Collaborative law is a process where parties work together with their lawyers and other professionals, such as financial advisors or mental health professionals, to reach a mutually acceptable agreement. This process is often used in divorce cases in the UK and can be less adversarial than going to court. However, like mediation, collaborative law requires a certain level of cooperation between the parties.
Negotiation is a process where parties to a dispute work together to reach an agreement without the involvement of a neutral third party. This can be done through informal discussions or formal negotiations. Negotiation can be less expensive and less formal than going to court, but it also requires a certain level of cooperation between the parties.
In the UK, ADR is encouraged by the courts and is often used as a first step in resolving disputes. The Family Procedure Rules 2010 and various amendments require parties to attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting (MIAM) before they can apply to the court for certain types of family law disputes.
The following Family Rules and Practice Directions apply :-
The purpose of the MIAM is to inform parties about the benefits of mediation and other forms of ADR and to assess whether mediation or another form of ADR is appropriate for the case.
If parties do not reach an agreement through mediation or other forms of ADR, they may still need to go to court to resolve their dispute. However, even if the case goes to court, parties may be required to attempt mediation or other forms of ADR before the court will hear their case. This is known as “compulsory ADR” and is intended to encourage parties to resolve their dispute without the need for court intervention.
Mediation and other forms of ADR are not just limited to family law disputes in the UK. They can also be used to resolve disputes in other areas of law, such as civil law.
Civil law disputes can include a wide range of issues, such as breach of contract, negligence, property disputes, and employment disputes. Mediation and other forms of ADR can be used to resolve these disputes, as well as family law disputes.
In civil law disputes, parties may choose to use mediation as a way to resolve their dispute before going to court. This can be a less expensive, less formal, and less time-consuming option than going to court. Mediation can also allow parties to maintain a more amicable relationship, which can be important in business or employment disputes where ongoing relationships may be necessary.
Other forms of ADR, such as arbitration and negotiation, can also be used in civil law disputes. Arbitration can be a more formal and legally binding alternative to mediation, but it can also be less expensive and less time-consuming than going to court. Negotiation, like in family law disputes, involves parties working together to reach a mutually acceptable agreement without the involvement of a neutral third party.
The UK legal system encourages the use of ADR in civil law disputes as well. The Civil Procedure Rules 1998 require parties to consider ADR before going to court. This means that parties must show that they have considered ADR, such as mediation or arbitration, before going to court.
If parties do not reach an agreement through ADR, they may still need to go to court to resolve their dispute. However, even if the case goes to court, parties may be required to attempt mediation or other forms of ADR before the court will hear their case. This is intended to encourage parties to resolve their dispute without the need for court intervention, which can be a more costly and time-consuming option.
However, mediation requires a certain level of cooperation between the parties, and the mediator cannot impose a legally binding decision on the parties. Other forms of ADR, such as arbitration, collaborative law, and negotiation, may also be used to resolve family law and civil law disputes.
The UK legal system rightly encourages the use of ADR and may require parties to attempt mediation or other forms of ADR before going to court.
In conclusion, mediation and other forms of ADR can be effective tools for resolving family law and civil law disputes in the UK. Mediation can be less expensive, less adversarial, less time-consuming, less formal, and more private than going to court.
Sussex Police and the High SheriffThe Secret BarristerDodgy JudgesAuditing BritainBar Standards Board JusticeJustice System
Forensic science is a cornerstone of modern criminal justice, providing critical evidence that can make or break a case. However, the reliability and accuracy of… Read more: What is the Forensic Science Regulator ?
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands as a vital institution within the criminal justice system, dedicated to investigating potential miscarriages of justice. Established in… Read more: What is the Criminal Cases Review Commission ?
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) undertake regular surveys to assess the public’s perceptions of the police, as well as their confidence in the… Read more: Police Public Confidence and Engagement
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been revolutionising numerous industries in recent years, from healthcare to finance. One area that has been gaining more attention is the legal system, where AI such as OpenAI has the potential to revolutionize the way courts function.
The idea of AI replacing judges entirely may seem far-fetched, but with recent advancements in natural language processing and machine learning, it’s worth exploring the potential benefits, disadvantages, and moral implications of such a scenario.
Benefits of AI Replacing Judges
Efficiency: AI can analyse and process vast amounts of data much faster than humans, leading to faster decision-making and a more efficient legal system. This can be especially beneficial for cases involving large volumes of evidence or complex legal issues. By automating the process of reviewing evidence, AI can reduce the time and effort required for judges to reach a verdict. This can help reduce the backlog of cases and improve the speed of justice.
Consistency: AI systems can be programmed to apply legal principles and law consistently, which can help to reduce discrepancies between different judges’ rulings. This could result in a more predictable legal system and help to eliminate bias in decision-making found in the family law courts. AI could help reduce the possibility of subjective interpretations of the law and make it easier for lawyers to predict the outcome of a case.
Cost-Effective: The use of AI could potentially reduce the costs associated with hiring judges, clerks, and support staff. It could also help to reduce the backlog of cases and shorten the time it takes to reach a verdict. In the long run, the implementation of AI systems could save taxpayers a lot of money by reducing the cost of legal proceedings and making the legal system more efficient.
Accessibility: AI could make legal proceedings more accessible to those who may not have the means to hire an attorney or access legal services. By providing an AI-powered platform for people to file legal claims, people can quickly get the help they need and gain access to legal services. This could help to reduce the number of unrepresented litigants in the legal system and make the legal system more accessible to everyone.
Improved Decision-Making: AI systems can analyse data in ways that humans cannot, which could lead to improved decision-making in the legal system. By considering a broader range of factors and information, AI systems could help judges make more informed decisions, leading to more just outcomes. The use of AI could also help judges to identify patterns and trends that may not be immediately apparent, leading to better-informed legal decisions.
Disadvantages of AI Replacing Judges
Lack of Human Insight: While AI systems can process vast amounts of data, they lack the human insight that judges bring to the legal system. Judges have the ability to interpret complex legal issues, evaluate evidence, and consider individual circumstances that may be difficult for AI to replicate. In some cases, the nuanced decisions that judges make may require a level of human intuition that AI cannot replicate.
Potential Bias: AI systems are only as unbiased as the data they are trained on. If the data used to train the AI system is biased, the system will also be biased. This could result in unjust decisions being made, which would erode public trust in the legal system. AI could exacerbate existing biases in the legal system, and without careful consideration and attention, AI systems could perpetuate existing injustices.
Lack of Accountability: Unlike human judges, AI systems cannot be held accountable for their decisions. This means that if an AI system makes a mistake, it may be difficult to determine who is responsible. The use of AI in the legal system could create a scenario where there is no clear line of accountability for legal decisions, leading to potential legal and ethical issues.
Complex Programming: Programming an AI system to make legal decisions is a complex task. It requires expertise in both computer science and law, and the development of a reliable and unbiased AI system could be challenging. There is a risk that AI systems may make errors, misunderstand legal principles, or be vulnerable to hacking or manipulation. It is crucial to develop robust, transparent, and accountable AI systems that can be rigorously tested and evaluated before they are deployed in the legal system.
Ethical Considerations: The use of AI in the legal system raises ethical concerns. One of the primary concerns is the impact of AI on the legal profession, including the potential loss of jobs for judges, attorneys, and legal professionals. The use of AI could also raise questions about the appropriate level of human involvement in legal decision-making, and whether it is appropriate to delegate decisions with potentially life-altering consequences to machines.
Moral Implications of AI Replacing Judges
The use of AI in the legal system raises significant moral implications, including questions about the value of human judgment, the role of technology in society, and the appropriate balance between efficiency and fairness in the legal system. Some of the key moral implications of AI replacing judges include:
The Value of Human Judgment: The legal system is built on the premise that human judgment is valuable and necessary. The idea of AI replacing judges raises questions about the role of human judgment in the legal system and whether it is appropriate to delegate decision-making to machines. Some argue that human judgment is essential to ensuring a fair and just legal system, and that the use of AI could erode public trust in the legal system.
The Role of Technology in Society: The use of AI in the legal system raises broader questions about the role of technology in society. The deployment of AI systems in the legal system could set a precedent for the use of AI in other areas of society, raising questions about the appropriate level of automation in human decision-making. It could also contribute to the normalization of technology-driven decision-making, which could have significant implications for the way society functions.
The Balance Between Efficiency and Fairness: The use of AI in the legal system raises questions about the appropriate balance between efficiency and fairness in the legal system. While AI systems could potentially improve the efficiency of the legal system, they may also compromise the fairness of legal decision-making. The deployment of AI systems in the legal system requires careful consideration of the potential trade-offs between efficiency and fairness and the appropriate level of human involvement in decision-making.
The idea of AI replacing judges entirely is a controversial one, and it is clear that the legal system will continue to rely on human judgment for the foreseeable future. However, the deployment of AI systems in the legal system has the potential to improve the efficiency, consistency, and accessibility of the legal system. At the same time, it raises significant ethical and moral questions about the value of human judgment, the role of technology in society, and the appropriate balance between efficiency and fairness in the legal system.
The use of AI in the legal system requires careful consideration of these questions and a commitment to developing transparent, accountable, and unbiased AI systems. While the deployment of AI systems in the legal system is likely to be a slow and cautious process, it is clear that AI has the potential to revolutionize the legal system in ways that could benefit society as a whole. The key to harnessing the power of AI in the legal system is to ensure that it is developed and deployed in a way that aligns with our core values and principles, including fairness, accountability, and justice.
What is intelligence and why is it different to artificial intelligence ?
Intelligence is a term used to describe the ability to acquire, understand, and apply knowledge and skills to solve problems, reason, and learn from experience. It encompasses a range of cognitive abilities, including memory, perception, attention, reasoning, and problem-solving.
Artificial intelligence (AI), on the other hand, is a branch of computer science that focuses on creating machines that can perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as learning, reasoning, and problem-solving. AI systems use algorithms and statistical models to analyse data, recognize patterns, and make decisions based on that data.
While both intelligence and AI involve the ability to solve problems and learn from experience, there are some key differences between the two. One of the most significant differences is that human intelligence is often characterized by flexibility and adaptability. Humans are able to learn from a wide range of experiences, apply that knowledge to new situations, and adjust their behavior accordingly. AI systems, on the other hand, are designed to perform specific tasks and are less adaptable to new situations.
Another difference between intelligence and AI is that human intelligence is often characterized by creativity and originality. Humans are capable of generating new ideas and thinking outside the box, which is something that AI systems have not yet been able to replicate.
Finally, human intelligence is also characterized by emotions and social skills. Humans are able to understand and navigate complex social situations, which is something that AI systems have not yet been able to replicate.
In summary, while both intelligence and AI involve the ability to solve problems and learn from experience, there are key differences between the two. Human intelligence is characterized by flexibility, creativity, and social skills, while AI is focused on performing specific tasks using algorithms and statistical models.
OpenAI GPT and ChatGPT
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research organization that was founded in 2015 by a group of influential tech leaders, including Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Greg Brockman. The company is dedicated to advancing artificial intelligence in a safe and beneficial way.
One of the most notable products of OpenAI is the language model known as GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer). GPT is a neural network-based language model that is capable of generating human-like text in response to prompts or questions. GPT has been trained on vast amounts of text data, allowing it to generate coherent and contextually appropriate responses to a wide range of queries.
ChatGPT is a specific implementation of the GPT architecture that has been optimized for conversational applications. It is trained specifically on a vast corpus of conversational data, enabling it to produce natural and engaging responses to a wide range of inputs. ChatGPT is used by a variety of applications and services to provide natural language processing capabilities, including chatbots, virtual assistants, and customer service systems.
Forensic science is a cornerstone of modern criminal justice, providing critical evidence that can make or break a case. However, the reliability and accuracy of… Read more: What is the Forensic Science Regulator ?
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands as a vital institution within the criminal justice system, dedicated to investigating potential miscarriages of justice. Established in… Read more: What is the Criminal Cases Review Commission ?
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) undertake regular surveys to assess the public’s perceptions of the police, as well as their confidence in the… Read more: Police Public Confidence and Engagement
Forensic science is a cornerstone of modern criminal justice, providing critical evidence that can make or break a case. However, the reliability and accuracy of… Read more: What is the Forensic Science Regulator ?
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands as a vital institution within the criminal justice system, dedicated to investigating potential miscarriages of justice. Established in… Read more: What is the Criminal Cases Review Commission ?
The performance by Bob Vylan at Glastonbury 2025, where frontman Bobby Vylan (reportedly Pascal Robinson-Foster) led chants of “death, death to the IDF” and “from… Read more: Did Bobby Vylan and the BBC break the law at Glastonbury 2025 ?
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) undertake regular surveys to assess the public’s perceptions of the police, as well as their confidence in the… Read more: Police Public Confidence and Engagement
